Influence of multiple use of titanium and PEEK scan bodies on scan precision after sterilization and thermal disinfection: An in vitro study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Elisabeth Völler, Jan-Frederik Güth, Sebastian Heuser, Oliver Schubert, Josef Schweiger, Tobias Graf
{"title":"Influence of multiple use of titanium and PEEK scan bodies on scan precision after sterilization and thermal disinfection: An in vitro study.","authors":"Elisabeth Völler, Jan-Frederik Güth, Sebastian Heuser, Oliver Schubert, Josef Schweiger, Tobias Graf","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the influence of multiple uses of scan bodies after reprocessing cycles-steam sterilization and thermal disinfection-on the precision of implant position transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six mandibular models with two implants in regions 34 and 36 were fabricated. The implants were scanned with an intraoral scanner using pairs of titanium (SB_T_Pr) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) (SB_P_Pr) scan bodies according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The scan body group underwent up to 15 standardized reprocessing cycles. The unreprocessed titanium group (SB_T_NPr) served as a control. Three-dimensional deviations (R) between the implant positions were calculated from the scanned STL datasets and statistically analyzed (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A preliminary investigation demonstrated that 15 cycles of screwing in and out of the titanium or PEEK scan bodies did not influence subsequent measurements (P = 0.129, P = 0.215). The mean ΔR values were 38.9 ± 18.7 µm for SB_T_NPr and 42.6 ± 19.5 µm for SB_T_Pr. No significant differences in precision were found between the unprocessed and reprocessed titanium scan bodies within 15 cycles (P = 0.174). The mean ΔR value for SB_P_Pr was 27.1 ± 12.5 µm. In contrast, the PEEK scan bodies consistently showed significantly lower deviations than the titanium scan bodies (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEEK scan bodies demonstrate higher precision but may be limited by lower mechanical stability and their single-use concept. Titanium scan bodies, although slightly less precise, have proven to be mechanically robust and suitable for multiple reuses after the conducted reprocessing. Further clinical studies with extended re-processing cycles are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the influence of multiple uses of scan bodies after reprocessing cycles-steam sterilization and thermal disinfection-on the precision of implant position transfer.

Methods: Six mandibular models with two implants in regions 34 and 36 were fabricated. The implants were scanned with an intraoral scanner using pairs of titanium (SB_T_Pr) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) (SB_P_Pr) scan bodies according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The scan body group underwent up to 15 standardized reprocessing cycles. The unreprocessed titanium group (SB_T_NPr) served as a control. Three-dimensional deviations (R) between the implant positions were calculated from the scanned STL datasets and statistically analyzed (P < 0.05).

Results: A preliminary investigation demonstrated that 15 cycles of screwing in and out of the titanium or PEEK scan bodies did not influence subsequent measurements (P = 0.129, P = 0.215). The mean ΔR values were 38.9 ± 18.7 µm for SB_T_NPr and 42.6 ± 19.5 µm for SB_T_Pr. No significant differences in precision were found between the unprocessed and reprocessed titanium scan bodies within 15 cycles (P = 0.174). The mean ΔR value for SB_P_Pr was 27.1 ± 12.5 µm. In contrast, the PEEK scan bodies consistently showed significantly lower deviations than the titanium scan bodies (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: PEEK scan bodies demonstrate higher precision but may be limited by lower mechanical stability and their single-use concept. Titanium scan bodies, although slightly less precise, have proven to be mechanically robust and suitable for multiple reuses after the conducted reprocessing. Further clinical studies with extended re-processing cycles are required to confirm these findings.

钛和PEEK扫描体多次使用对灭菌和热消毒后扫描精度的影响:体外研究
目的:评价扫描体在再处理循环(蒸汽灭菌和热消毒)后多次使用对种植体定位精度的影响。方法:制作6个下颌骨模型,34区和36区各2个种植体。根据制造商的建议,使用一对钛(SB_T_Pr)和聚醚醚酮(PEEK) (SB_P_Pr)扫描体,用口腔内扫描仪扫描种植体。扫描体组进行了多达15个标准化的再处理循环。未加工钛组(SB_T_NPr)作为对照。根据扫描的STL数据集计算种植体位置之间的三维偏差(R),并进行统计学分析(P < 0.05)。结果:初步调查表明,15次旋入和旋出钛或PEEK扫描体对后续测量没有影响(P = 0.129, P = 0.215)。SB_T_NPr和SB_T_Pr的平均ΔR值分别为38.9±18.7µm和42.6±19.5µm。在15个周期内,未加工和再加工钛扫描体的精度无显著差异(P = 0.174)。SB_P_Pr的平均ΔR值为27.1±12.5µm。相比之下,PEEK扫描体始终显示明显低于钛扫描体的偏差(P < 0.001)。结论:PEEK扫描体具有较高的精度,但可能受到机械稳定性较低和一次性使用概念的限制。钛扫描体虽然精度稍低,但已被证明具有机械坚固性,适合进行后处理后的多次重复使用。进一步的临床研究需要延长再处理周期来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of prosthodontic research
Journal of prosthodontic research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication. Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function. The most-targeted topics: 1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics 2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics 3) Oral Implantology 4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology) 5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism) 6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) 7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry 8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation 9) Digital Dentistry Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions. Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书