Decoding Cone Morphology in Keratoconus: A Retrospective Study on Contact Lens Selection in Turkish Patients.

IF 0.9 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_82_25
Gül Varan, Serkan Güler, Seda Duran Güler, Burcu Nurözler Tabakçi, Yusuf Yildirim
{"title":"Decoding Cone Morphology in Keratoconus: A Retrospective Study on Contact Lens Selection in Turkish Patients.","authors":"Gül Varan, Serkan Güler, Seda Duran Güler, Burcu Nurözler Tabakçi, Yusuf Yildirim","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_82_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the relationship between cone morphology and the selection of appropriate contact lens types for patients with keratoconus. Specifically, this study aimed to evaluate how keratometry values, cone morphology, and disease severity influence contact lens fitting and visual outcomes. The goal was to optimize contact lens fitting and improve visual rehabilitation for these patients by understanding the correlation between these parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed data from 108 eyes of 73 patients with keratoconus who had undergone corneal cross-linking and had not undergone any prior refractive surgeries. Patient demographics, keratometry values, corneal topography, and keratoconus morphology were recorded, along with the contact lens types prescribed. Keratoconus was classified morphologically (central/nipple, oval, and globus) and graded according to the Amsler-Krumeich system. Statistical analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between disease characteristics and contact lens selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 108 eyes from 73 patients (mean age: 28.19 ± 8.1 years) were included. Cone morphology was classified as central cone (61.1%), oval cone (32.4%), and globus cone (6.4%). Scleral lenses were the most commonly prescribed (50%), particularly in eyes with advanced keratoconus, such as globus keratoconus and Grade 4 disease. Hybrid and rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses were commonly prescribed for moderate keratoconus, while toric lenses were most often used for mild cases. Visual acuity improved significantly after lens fitting, with best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) improving from 0.85 ± 0.38 to 0.07 ± 0.12 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). This improvement highlights the effectiveness of individualized lens fitting in enhancing visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personalized contact lens selection based on keratometry, cone morphology, and disease severity is crucial for optimizing visual rehabilitation in patients with keratoconus. Scleral lenses are the preferred option for advanced keratoconus, while hybrid and RGP lenses are effective for moderate cases. These findings provide valuable insights for tailoring treatment strategies and improving outcomes in keratoconus management. The study highlights the importance of individualizing lens fitting to achieve better visual outcomes and to guide clinical decisions in the management of keratoconus.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"37 3","pages":"315-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13075918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_82_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the relationship between cone morphology and the selection of appropriate contact lens types for patients with keratoconus. Specifically, this study aimed to evaluate how keratometry values, cone morphology, and disease severity influence contact lens fitting and visual outcomes. The goal was to optimize contact lens fitting and improve visual rehabilitation for these patients by understanding the correlation between these parameters.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed data from 108 eyes of 73 patients with keratoconus who had undergone corneal cross-linking and had not undergone any prior refractive surgeries. Patient demographics, keratometry values, corneal topography, and keratoconus morphology were recorded, along with the contact lens types prescribed. Keratoconus was classified morphologically (central/nipple, oval, and globus) and graded according to the Amsler-Krumeich system. Statistical analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between disease characteristics and contact lens selection.

Results: A total of 108 eyes from 73 patients (mean age: 28.19 ± 8.1 years) were included. Cone morphology was classified as central cone (61.1%), oval cone (32.4%), and globus cone (6.4%). Scleral lenses were the most commonly prescribed (50%), particularly in eyes with advanced keratoconus, such as globus keratoconus and Grade 4 disease. Hybrid and rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses were commonly prescribed for moderate keratoconus, while toric lenses were most often used for mild cases. Visual acuity improved significantly after lens fitting, with best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) improving from 0.85 ± 0.38 to 0.07 ± 0.12 (P < 0.0001). This improvement highlights the effectiveness of individualized lens fitting in enhancing visual outcomes.

Conclusions: Personalized contact lens selection based on keratometry, cone morphology, and disease severity is crucial for optimizing visual rehabilitation in patients with keratoconus. Scleral lenses are the preferred option for advanced keratoconus, while hybrid and RGP lenses are effective for moderate cases. These findings provide valuable insights for tailoring treatment strategies and improving outcomes in keratoconus management. The study highlights the importance of individualizing lens fitting to achieve better visual outcomes and to guide clinical decisions in the management of keratoconus.

解读圆锥角膜的锥体形态:土耳其患者选择隐形眼镜的回顾性研究。
目的:探讨圆锥角膜患者角膜锥体形态与选择合适的隐形眼镜类型的关系。具体而言,本研究旨在评估角膜测量值、锥体形态和疾病严重程度如何影响隐形眼镜配戴和视力结果。目的是通过了解这些参数之间的相关性来优化隐形眼镜配戴并改善这些患者的视力康复。方法:本回顾性研究回顾了73例圆锥角膜患者108只眼的资料,这些患者之前没有做过屈光手术。记录患者的人口统计学、角膜测量值、角膜地形图和圆锥角膜形态,以及规定的隐形眼镜类型。圆锥角膜在形态学上进行分类(中心/乳头,卵圆形和球形),并根据Amsler-Krumeich系统分级。统计分析疾病特征与隐形眼镜选择的关系。结果:共纳入73例患者108只眼,平均年龄28.19±8.1岁。锥体形态分为中心锥体(61.1%)、椭圆形锥体(32.4%)和球状锥体(6.4%)。巩膜晶状体是最常见的处方(50%),特别是对于晚期圆锥角膜,如圆锥球形角膜和4级疾病的眼睛。混合型和刚性透气性(RGP)晶状体常用于中度圆锥角膜,而环面晶状体常用于轻度圆锥角膜。配戴晶状体后,视力明显改善,最佳矫正视力(logMAR)由0.85±0.38改善至0.07±0.12 (P < 0.0001)。这一改进突出了个性化晶状体安装在提高视力结果方面的有效性。结论:基于角膜测量、锥体形态和疾病严重程度的个性化隐形眼镜选择对于优化圆锥角膜患者的视力康复至关重要。巩膜晶状体是晚期圆锥角膜的首选,而混合晶状体和RGP晶状体对中度病例有效。这些发现提供了有价值的见解定制治疗策略和改善圆锥角膜管理的结果。该研究强调了个性化晶状体配合术的重要性,以获得更好的视力结果,并指导圆锥角膜治疗的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书