PRESERFLO MicroShunt Implantation as a Repeat Surgery after Failed Ab Interno XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation: A Case-Matched Study.

IF 0.9 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_256_25
David Kiessling, Jan Niklas Lüke, Alexandra Lappas, Thomas S Dietlein, Gernot F Roessler, Randolf A Widder
{"title":"PRESERFLO MicroShunt Implantation as a Repeat Surgery after Failed Ab Interno XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation: A Case-Matched Study.","authors":"David Kiessling, Jan Niklas Lüke, Alexandra Lappas, Thomas S Dietlein, Gernot F Roessler, Randolf A Widder","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_256_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate through a case-matched analysis whether failed ab interno XEN45 Gel Stent implantation exerts an influence on the outcome after subsequent implantation of a Preserflo MicroShunt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 70 eyes from 70 participants who underwent Preserflo MicroShunt implantation were included. Thirty-five eyes each underwent primary stent implantation (control group) or had previously undergone failed XEN45 Gel Stent implantation (post-XEN group). The two groups were matched at a 1:1 ratio based on the following criteria: preoperative and maximum intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative medication score, cup/disc-ratio, follow-up time, and age. Surgery was defined as either \"success\" or \"failure\" based on the following three scores: an IOP reduction of >20% and IOP at the longest follow-up <21 mmHg (Score A) or <18 mmHg (Score B) or IOP ≤15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥40% (Score C). In all scores, revision surgery was considered a failure. Furthermore, we compared postoperative IOP and medication score, side effects, and revision rate between both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean IOP decreased from 28.9 to 12.2 mmHg in the post-XEN group and from 27.7 to 12.9 mmHg in the control group, while the mean medication score decreased from 2.1 in the post-XEN group and from 2.6 in the control group to 0.3, respectively. Comparative analyses between the two groups did not reveal a significant difference in postoperative IOP, medication score, side effects, revision, or success rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preserflo MicroShunt implantation can be considered a viable option for repeat surgery in patients with bleb failure after prior XEN45 Gel Stent implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"37 3","pages":"304-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13075934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_256_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate through a case-matched analysis whether failed ab interno XEN45 Gel Stent implantation exerts an influence on the outcome after subsequent implantation of a Preserflo MicroShunt.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 70 eyes from 70 participants who underwent Preserflo MicroShunt implantation were included. Thirty-five eyes each underwent primary stent implantation (control group) or had previously undergone failed XEN45 Gel Stent implantation (post-XEN group). The two groups were matched at a 1:1 ratio based on the following criteria: preoperative and maximum intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative medication score, cup/disc-ratio, follow-up time, and age. Surgery was defined as either "success" or "failure" based on the following three scores: an IOP reduction of >20% and IOP at the longest follow-up <21 mmHg (Score A) or <18 mmHg (Score B) or IOP ≤15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥40% (Score C). In all scores, revision surgery was considered a failure. Furthermore, we compared postoperative IOP and medication score, side effects, and revision rate between both groups.

Results: Mean IOP decreased from 28.9 to 12.2 mmHg in the post-XEN group and from 27.7 to 12.9 mmHg in the control group, while the mean medication score decreased from 2.1 in the post-XEN group and from 2.6 in the control group to 0.3, respectively. Comparative analyses between the two groups did not reveal a significant difference in postoperative IOP, medication score, side effects, revision, or success rate.

Conclusion: Preserflo MicroShunt implantation can be considered a viable option for repeat surgery in patients with bleb failure after prior XEN45 Gel Stent implantation.

Ab Interno XEN45凝胶支架植入失败后,PRESERFLO微分流植入作为重复手术:一项病例匹配研究。
目的:通过病例匹配分析,探讨XEN45凝胶支架植入术失败对Preserflo MicroShunt后续植入术的影响。方法:回顾性分析70例接受Preserflo MicroShunt植入术的患者70只眼。35只眼睛分别接受了初次支架植入术(对照组)或之前接受过失败的XEN45凝胶支架植入术(xen后组)。根据术前和最大眼压(IOP)、术前用药评分、杯/盘比、随访时间、年龄按1:1比例进行配对。根据以下三个评分来定义手术的“成功”或“失败”:IOP降低bbbb20 %和最长随访时的IOP结果:xen后组平均IOP从28.9下降到12.2 mmHg,对照组从27.7下降到12.9 mmHg, xen后组和对照组的平均用药评分分别从2.1和2.6下降到0.3。两组间的比较分析未发现术后IOP、药物评分、副作用、翻修或成功率有显著差异。结论:Preserflo MicroShunt植入可以被认为是先前XEN45凝胶支架植入后水泡衰竭患者重复手术的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书