Optimal Switching Antiplatelet Regimen in Patients with Ticagrelor to a Thienopyridine in Korean Patients (SWAPT-K Study).

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hyoun-Woo Noh, Sung-Hyo Seo, Yong-Lee Kim, Chang-Ok Seo, Moojun Kim, Jeong Rang Park, KyeHwan Kim, Hye Ree Kim, Jin-Yong Hwang, Seok-Jae Hwang, Min Gyu Kang, Hangyul Kim, Yongwhi Park, Jin-Sin Koh
{"title":"Optimal Switching Antiplatelet Regimen in Patients with Ticagrelor to a Thienopyridine in Korean Patients (SWAPT-K Study).","authors":"Hyoun-Woo Noh, Sung-Hyo Seo, Yong-Lee Kim, Chang-Ok Seo, Moojun Kim, Jeong Rang Park, KyeHwan Kim, Hye Ree Kim, Jin-Yong Hwang, Seok-Jae Hwang, Min Gyu Kang, Hangyul Kim, Yongwhi Park, Jin-Sin Koh","doi":"10.1177/10742484261440340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and potent P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitors such as ticagrelor effectively reduces ischemic events but increases bleeding risk. In patients requiring long-term DAPT, switching from ticagrelor to a thienopyridine is often considered to reduce bleeding risk or address other clinical concerns. However, such switching may cause a transient reduction in platelet inhibition, raising concerns about thrombotic complications. In particular, evidence is limited regarding the optimal loading dose strategy for East Asian patients undergoing this transition.MethodsIn this randomized, open-label trial, 43 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who had received ticagrelor-based DAPT for > 6 months after stent implantation were randomized to clopidogrel 600 mg loading/75 mg maintenance, clopidogrel 300 mg loading/75 mg maintenance, or prasugrel 30 mg loading/5 mg maintenance. Platelet reactivity and inflammatory markers (MMP-2, MMP-9, TNF-α) were assessed at baseline, 48 h, and 5 days after switching. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving optimal platelet reactivity (OPR).ResultsThe proportion of patients achieving OPR was similar among groups at baseline (p = 0.483), 48 h (p = 0.699), and 5 days (p = 0.729). No significant intergroup differences were observed in inflammatory marker levels at any time point. No major adverse cardiovascular events occurred during follow-up.ConclusionsIn stable ACS patients on long-term DAPT, switching from ticagrelor to either clopidogrel or prasugrel maintained consistent platelet inhibition and inflammatory profiles, indicating that these switching strategies produce comparable pharmacodynamic profiles in East Asian populations during the early post-switch period.Trial RegistrationThis investigator-initiated pharmacodynamic study was not prospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":15281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"31 ","pages":"10742484261440340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484261440340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and potent P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor effectively reduces ischemic events but increases bleeding risk. In patients requiring long-term DAPT, switching from ticagrelor to a thienopyridine is often considered to reduce bleeding risk or address other clinical concerns. However, such switching may cause a transient reduction in platelet inhibition, raising concerns about thrombotic complications. In particular, evidence is limited regarding the optimal loading dose strategy for East Asian patients undergoing this transition.MethodsIn this randomized, open-label trial, 43 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who had received ticagrelor-based DAPT for > 6 months after stent implantation were randomized to clopidogrel 600 mg loading/75 mg maintenance, clopidogrel 300 mg loading/75 mg maintenance, or prasugrel 30 mg loading/5 mg maintenance. Platelet reactivity and inflammatory markers (MMP-2, MMP-9, TNF-α) were assessed at baseline, 48 h, and 5 days after switching. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving optimal platelet reactivity (OPR).ResultsThe proportion of patients achieving OPR was similar among groups at baseline (p = 0.483), 48 h (p = 0.699), and 5 days (p = 0.729). No significant intergroup differences were observed in inflammatory marker levels at any time point. No major adverse cardiovascular events occurred during follow-up.ConclusionsIn stable ACS patients on long-term DAPT, switching from ticagrelor to either clopidogrel or prasugrel maintained consistent platelet inhibition and inflammatory profiles, indicating that these switching strategies produce comparable pharmacodynamic profiles in East Asian populations during the early post-switch period.Trial RegistrationThis investigator-initiated pharmacodynamic study was not prospectively registered.

韩国患者从替格瑞洛转为噻吩吡啶的最佳抗血小板转换方案(swap - k研究)。
背景:阿司匹林联合强效P2Y12抑制剂(如替格瑞洛)的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)可有效减少缺血事件,但增加出血风险。在需要长期DAPT的患者中,从替格瑞洛转为噻吩吡啶通常被认为可以降低出血风险或解决其他临床问题。然而,这种转换可能导致血小板抑制的短暂性降低,引起对血栓并发症的关注。特别是,关于东亚患者的最佳负荷剂量策略的证据有限。方法在这项随机、开放标签的试验中,43例急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者在支架植入术后6个月接受替卡格雷DAPT治疗,随机分为氯吡格雷600mg负荷/ 75mg维持组、氯吡格雷300mg负荷/ 75mg维持组和普拉格雷30mg负荷/ 5mg维持组。在基线、48小时和切换后5天评估血小板反应性和炎症标志物(MMP-2、MMP-9、TNF-α)。主要终点是达到最佳血小板反应性(OPR)的患者比例。结果两组患者在基线(p = 0.483)、48 h (p = 0.699)和5 d (p = 0.729)时达到OPR的比例相似。各组间各时间点炎症标志物水平均无显著差异。随访期间未发生重大心血管不良事件。结论:在长期DAPT治疗的稳定ACS患者中,从替格瑞洛切换到氯吡格雷或普拉格雷保持了一致的血小板抑制和炎症特征,表明这些转换策略在转换后早期在东亚人群中产生了相似的药效学特征。试验注册:这项研究者发起的药效学研究没有前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JCPT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical application to cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. Experimental studies focus on translational research. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书