AI triage of duodenal biopsies improves workflow.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Frederick George Mayall, Charles Mayall, Ian Bodger, Henry Mayall
{"title":"AI triage of duodenal biopsies improves workflow.","authors":"Frederick George Mayall, Charles Mayall, Ian Bodger, Henry Mayall","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2026-210658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop, deploy and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) for triaging duodenal biopsies within a National Health Service (NHS) histopathology laboratory, with the aim of improving reporting turnaround times for clinically significant diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pathway was developed in the UK in an NHS laboratory. Rule-based automation software was used to find all newly scanned duodenal biopsy slides. Those with case numbers ending in an odd number were exported for AI triage and if they had significant AI predicted abnormalities they were prioritised for reporting. The cases with even numbers followed the routine reporting pathway.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>313 cases (517 duodenal slides) were processed by the routine pathway, and 329 cases (533 duodenal slides) were processed by the AI triage pathway. AI processing took about 70 s per slide. The AI classifier had a sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) as follows: normal small bowel: 99.6%, 95.7%; coeliac disease: 86.7%, 100%; gastric heterotopia: 84.6%, 95.7%; adenoma: 88.9%, 88.9%; adenocarcinoma: 50.0%, 100%. In the AI triage workstream coeliac disease, and non-neoplastic abnormalities as a group, were reported quicker than in the standard workstream (6 days vs 10 days and 7 days vs 10 days, respectively, both p<0.005), but neoplastic lesions were not reported quicker. The cost of deployment and operation was reasonable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An NHS histopathology laboratory successfully developed and implemented an AI-based triage system for duodenal biopsies, achieving high diagnostic accuracy and significantly improving turnaround times for coeliac disease and non-neoplastic abnormalities as a group. This study demonstrates the feasibility and clinical value of locally developed AI tools within routine diagnostic practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2026-210658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To develop, deploy and evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) for triaging duodenal biopsies within a National Health Service (NHS) histopathology laboratory, with the aim of improving reporting turnaround times for clinically significant diagnoses.

Methods: The pathway was developed in the UK in an NHS laboratory. Rule-based automation software was used to find all newly scanned duodenal biopsy slides. Those with case numbers ending in an odd number were exported for AI triage and if they had significant AI predicted abnormalities they were prioritised for reporting. The cases with even numbers followed the routine reporting pathway.

Results: 313 cases (517 duodenal slides) were processed by the routine pathway, and 329 cases (533 duodenal slides) were processed by the AI triage pathway. AI processing took about 70 s per slide. The AI classifier had a sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) as follows: normal small bowel: 99.6%, 95.7%; coeliac disease: 86.7%, 100%; gastric heterotopia: 84.6%, 95.7%; adenoma: 88.9%, 88.9%; adenocarcinoma: 50.0%, 100%. In the AI triage workstream coeliac disease, and non-neoplastic abnormalities as a group, were reported quicker than in the standard workstream (6 days vs 10 days and 7 days vs 10 days, respectively, both p<0.005), but neoplastic lesions were not reported quicker. The cost of deployment and operation was reasonable.

Conclusions: An NHS histopathology laboratory successfully developed and implemented an AI-based triage system for duodenal biopsies, achieving high diagnostic accuracy and significantly improving turnaround times for coeliac disease and non-neoplastic abnormalities as a group. This study demonstrates the feasibility and clinical value of locally developed AI tools within routine diagnostic practice.

十二指肠活检的人工智能分诊改善了工作流程。
目的:在国家卫生服务(NHS)组织病理学实验室中开发、部署和评估用于十二指肠活检分诊的人工智能(AI),目的是改善临床重要诊断的报告周期。方法:该途径是在英国NHS实验室开发的。使用基于规则的自动化软件查找所有新扫描的十二指肠活检切片。那些病例编号以奇数结尾的病例将被导出供人工智能分类,如果它们有明显的人工智能预测异常,它们将被优先报告。偶数病例遵循常规报告途径。结果:常规路径处理313例(517例),人工智能分诊路径处理329例(533例)。每张幻灯片的人工智能处理时间约为70秒。人工智能分类器的敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为:正常小肠:99.6%,95.7%;乳糜泻:86.7%,100%;胃异位:84.6%,95.7%;腺瘤:88.9%,88.9%;腺癌:50.0%,100%。在人工智能分类工作流程中,乳糜泻和非肿瘤性异常作为一个组的报告速度比标准工作流程快(分别为6天对10天,7天对10天)。结论:NHS组织病理学实验室成功开发并实施了基于人工智能的十二指肠活检分类系统,实现了高诊断准确性,并显著改善了乳糜泻和非肿瘤性异常作为一个组的转诊时间。本研究证明了本地开发的人工智能工具在常规诊断实践中的可行性和临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书