Three years treatment with HDM allergen immunotherapy, omalizumab, or combination therapy in allergic asthma: clinical outcomes and biomarkers.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-25 DOI:10.1080/02770903.2026.2660096
Andrzej Bozek, Martyna Miodonska, Dominika Sadowska, Jolanta Zalejska Fiolka, Janne Winterstein, Giorgio Walter Canonica
{"title":"Three years treatment with HDM allergen immunotherapy, omalizumab, or combination therapy in allergic asthma: clinical outcomes and biomarkers.","authors":"Andrzej Bozek, Martyna Miodonska, Dominika Sadowska, Jolanta Zalejska Fiolka, Janne Winterstein, Giorgio Walter Canonica","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2026.2660096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and biologics such as omalizumab are established treatments for allergic asthma, but long-term data on their combined use are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare long-term clinical and immunological outcomes of omalizumab, subcutaneous AIT for house dust mite (SCIT-HDM), and their combination in mild-to-moderate allergic asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, 79 patients with HDM-driven allergic asthma were assigned to omalizumab (A), omalizumab plus SCIT-HDM (B), SCIT-HDM (C), or standard therapy (D). Patients were followed for 36 months. Primary outcomes were changes in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and annual exacerbations. Secondary outcomes included symptom and medication scores, Asthma Control Test (ACT), asthma quality of life (AQLQ), lung function, remission rates, and biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed significant reductions in ICS use, with greater reductions in groups A and B than in C and D (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Combination therapy (B) resulted in lower exacerbation rates and reduced oral corticosteroid use compared to other groups. Improvements in ACT, FEV<sub>1</sub>, and AQLQ were observed across all groups, with more consistent benefits in A and B. Clinical remission occurred most often in group B (47%), followed by A (31%), C (29%), and D (14%). Biomarker changes indicated reduced type 2 inflammation and immunological responses to therapy. No serious adverse events or systemic hypersensitivity reactions were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Omalizumab, SCIT-HDM, and their combination improved outcomes over 36 months. Combination therapy showed the most consistent benefits, but results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample size. Further studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1254-1266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2026.2660096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and biologics such as omalizumab are established treatments for allergic asthma, but long-term data on their combined use are limited.

Objective: To compare long-term clinical and immunological outcomes of omalizumab, subcutaneous AIT for house dust mite (SCIT-HDM), and their combination in mild-to-moderate allergic asthma.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, 79 patients with HDM-driven allergic asthma were assigned to omalizumab (A), omalizumab plus SCIT-HDM (B), SCIT-HDM (C), or standard therapy (D). Patients were followed for 36 months. Primary outcomes were changes in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and annual exacerbations. Secondary outcomes included symptom and medication scores, Asthma Control Test (ACT), asthma quality of life (AQLQ), lung function, remission rates, and biomarkers.

Results: All groups showed significant reductions in ICS use, with greater reductions in groups A and B than in C and D (p < 0.05). Combination therapy (B) resulted in lower exacerbation rates and reduced oral corticosteroid use compared to other groups. Improvements in ACT, FEV1, and AQLQ were observed across all groups, with more consistent benefits in A and B. Clinical remission occurred most often in group B (47%), followed by A (31%), C (29%), and D (14%). Biomarker changes indicated reduced type 2 inflammation and immunological responses to therapy. No serious adverse events or systemic hypersensitivity reactions were observed.

Conclusions: Omalizumab, SCIT-HDM, and their combination improved outcomes over 36 months. Combination therapy showed the most consistent benefits, but results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample size. Further studies are needed.

过敏性哮喘患者接受HDM过敏原免疫治疗、omalizumab或联合治疗3年:临床结果和生物标志物
背景:过敏原免疫疗法(AIT)和生物制剂(如omalizumab)是过敏性哮喘的既定治疗方法,但它们联合使用的长期数据有限。目的:比较奥玛珠单抗、屋尘螨皮下AIT (SCIT-HDM)及其联合治疗轻中度过敏性哮喘的长期临床和免疫学结果。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、对照研究中,79例hdm驱动的过敏性哮喘患者被分配到omalizumab (A)、omalizumab联合SCIT-HDM (B)、SCIT-HDM (C)或标准治疗(D)。随访36个月。主要结局是吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)剂量的变化和年加重。次要结局包括症状和药物评分、哮喘控制测试(ACT)、哮喘生活质量(AQLQ)、肺功能、缓解率和生物标志物。结果:所有组均显示ICS使用显著减少,A组和B组比C组和D组减少更大(p < 1),所有组均观察到AQLQ, A组和B组的获益更一致。临床缓解最常发生在B组(47%),其次是A组(31%),C组(29%)和D组(14%)。生物标志物变化表明治疗后2型炎症和免疫反应减少。未见严重不良事件或全身过敏反应。结论:Omalizumab, SCIT-HDM及其联合使用改善了36个月的预后。联合治疗显示出最一致的益处,但由于样本量小,结果应谨慎解释。需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书