Seyeon Chang, Jihwan Lee, Seungwon Jung, Dongcheol Song, Sehyun Park, Kyeongho Jeon, Hyuck Kim, Jinho Cho
{"title":"Effects of illite or bentonite on cytotoxicity, antibacterial and adsorption capacity in porcine intestinal epithelial cells.","authors":"Seyeon Chang, Jihwan Lee, Seungwon Jung, Dongcheol Song, Sehyun Park, Kyeongho Jeon, Hyuck Kim, Jinho Cho","doi":"10.5187/jast.2024.e107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the cytotoxicity of illite and bentonite using porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) as a primary screening verification method for the effect of supplementing illite and bentonite. Also, it evaluated the antibacterial activity and adsorption capacity of illite and bentonite by infecting IPEC-J2 cells with pathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i>. The addition levels of illite and bentonite in IPEC-J2 cells medium were set as follows; CON, 0%; I1, illite 1%, I1.5, illite 1.5%; I2, illite 2%; B1, bentonite 1%; B1.5, bentonite 1.5%; B2, bentonite 2%. The treatment time of illite and bentonite on IPEC-J2 cells was set to 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours. Cytotoxicity and wound healing assays were analyzed without <i>E. coli</i> challenge. Cell viability and <i>E. coli</i> adhesion ability were assessed through illite or bentonite treatment with <i>E. coli</i> challenge. All experiments were performed with three independent replicates, with six technical replicates per experiment. The B1.5 and B2 treatment groups showed higher (TRT, <i>p</i> < 0.05) cytotoxicity than the CON and illite groups. There was no significant difference in cytotoxicity according to the illite and bentonite treatment time. For wound closure rate, when illite and bentonite were treated for 6 hours, a significantly higher (Time, <i>p</i> < 0.05) healing rate was shown than that of the 2 and 4-hour treatments. The B1 with <i>E. coli</i> challenge group showed a significantly higher (TRT, <i>p</i> < 0.05) live cell count than the non-supplementation with <i>E. coli</i> challenge and B2 with <i>E. coli</i> challenge groups. In conclusion, except for 1.5% and 2% addition levels of bentonite, the illite and bentonites did not induce cytotoxicity in IPEC-J2 cells regardless of the treatment time. They were thought to be effective in wound healing ability in IPEC-J2 cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":14923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","volume":"68 2","pages":"487-498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2024.e107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the cytotoxicity of illite and bentonite using porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) as a primary screening verification method for the effect of supplementing illite and bentonite. Also, it evaluated the antibacterial activity and adsorption capacity of illite and bentonite by infecting IPEC-J2 cells with pathogenic Escherichia coli. The addition levels of illite and bentonite in IPEC-J2 cells medium were set as follows; CON, 0%; I1, illite 1%, I1.5, illite 1.5%; I2, illite 2%; B1, bentonite 1%; B1.5, bentonite 1.5%; B2, bentonite 2%. The treatment time of illite and bentonite on IPEC-J2 cells was set to 2 hours, 4 hours, and 6 hours. Cytotoxicity and wound healing assays were analyzed without E. coli challenge. Cell viability and E. coli adhesion ability were assessed through illite or bentonite treatment with E. coli challenge. All experiments were performed with three independent replicates, with six technical replicates per experiment. The B1.5 and B2 treatment groups showed higher (TRT, p < 0.05) cytotoxicity than the CON and illite groups. There was no significant difference in cytotoxicity according to the illite and bentonite treatment time. For wound closure rate, when illite and bentonite were treated for 6 hours, a significantly higher (Time, p < 0.05) healing rate was shown than that of the 2 and 4-hour treatments. The B1 with E. coli challenge group showed a significantly higher (TRT, p < 0.05) live cell count than the non-supplementation with E. coli challenge and B2 with E. coli challenge groups. In conclusion, except for 1.5% and 2% addition levels of bentonite, the illite and bentonites did not induce cytotoxicity in IPEC-J2 cells regardless of the treatment time. They were thought to be effective in wound healing ability in IPEC-J2 cells.
本研究以猪肠上皮细胞(IPEC-J2)为研究对象,对伊利石和膨润土的细胞毒性进行了初步筛选,验证了添加伊利石和膨润土的效果。并通过致病性大肠杆菌感染IPEC-J2细胞,评价了伊利石和膨润土的抑菌活性和吸附能力。IPEC-J2细胞培养基中伊利石和膨润土的添加量设为:反对,0%;I1,伊利石1%,I1.5,伊利石1.5%;I2,伊利石2%;B1,膨润土1%;B1.5、膨润土1.5%;B2,膨润土2%。伊利石和膨润土对IPEC-J2细胞的作用时间分别为2小时、4小时和6小时。在没有大肠杆菌攻击的情况下进行细胞毒性和伤口愈合试验。通过伊利石或膨润土处理大肠杆菌攻毒,评价细胞活力和大肠杆菌粘附能力。所有实验设3个独立重复,每个实验设6个技术重复。B1.5和B2处理组细胞毒性显著高于CON和illite组(TRT, p < 0.05)。伊利石和膨润土处理时间对细胞毒性无显著影响。在伤口愈合率方面,伊利石和膨润土处理6小时的愈合率显著高于处理2和4小时(p < 0.05)。B1攻毒组活细胞计数显著高于未攻毒组和B2攻毒组(TRT, p < 0.05)。综上所述,除了添加1.5%和2%的膨润土外,无论处理时间如何,伊利石和膨润土均未对IPEC-J2细胞产生细胞毒性。它们被认为对IPEC-J2细胞的伤口愈合能力有效。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Sci. Technol. or JAST) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, review articles and notes in all fields of animal science.
Topics covered by the journal include: genetics and breeding, physiology, nutrition of monogastric animals, nutrition of ruminants, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, grasslands and roughages, livestock environment, animal biotechnology, animal behavior and welfare.
Articles generally report research involving beef cattle, dairy cattle, pigs, companion animals, goats, horses, and sheep. However, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will also be considered for publication.
The Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Technol. or JAST) has been the official journal of The Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) since 2000, formerly known as The Korean Journal of Animal Sciences (launched in 1956).