Development and validation of the Health Belief Scale for Sarcopenia Prevention and Management (HBSPM): a pilot study among older adults in Guangdong, China.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jiamin Fang, Hao Liang, Jintao Zhong, Zhixia Jiang, Shilong Lu, Zhuyun Liu, Rui Chen, Ruotong Liao, Tao Zou, Qingyuan Su, Lin Wei
{"title":"Development and validation of the Health Belief Scale for Sarcopenia Prevention and Management (HBSPM): a pilot study among older adults in Guangdong, China.","authors":"Jiamin Fang, Hao Liang, Jintao Zhong, Zhixia Jiang, Shilong Lu, Zhuyun Liu, Rui Chen, Ruotong Liao, Tao Zou, Qingyuan Su, Lin Wei","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02537-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of sarcopenia among older adults is rising annually, highlighting the importance of enhancing awareness and self-management in sarcopenia prevention as a critical public health priority. This study aimed to develop and validate the Health Belief Scale for Sarcopenia Prevention and Management (HBSPM) in older adults and to assess its reliability and validity. METHODS: This study was conducted in two phases. Guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM), the HBSPM was developed through a comprehensive literature review, expert consultation, and cognitive interviews. In May 2024, 701 older adults were recruited through stratified convenience sampling across from cities classified into three tiers according to their 2023 GDP levels in Guangdong Province. The validity of the HBSPM was assessed using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: The scale consists of 30 items across six dimensions: Susceptibility (5 items), Seriousness (6 items), Benefits (4 items), Barriers (5 items), Cues for Action (5 items), and Self-Efficacy (5 items). EFA revealed that these six factors accounted for 60.42% of the total variance. Factor loadings for the 30 items ranged from 0.615 to 0.759. The scale demonstrated good validity (χ²/df = 1.466, RMSEA = 0.045, TLI = 0.965, IFI = 0.961, NFI = 0.897, CFI = 0.965, GFI = 0.852, I-CVI > 0.86, S-CVI = 0.989) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.935). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the HBSPM is an effective tool for measuring health belief regarding sarcopenia prevention and management among older adults and provides a robust foundation for targeted health education and behavioral interventions. </p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13188640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02537-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of sarcopenia among older adults is rising annually, highlighting the importance of enhancing awareness and self-management in sarcopenia prevention as a critical public health priority. This study aimed to develop and validate the Health Belief Scale for Sarcopenia Prevention and Management (HBSPM) in older adults and to assess its reliability and validity. METHODS: This study was conducted in two phases. Guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM), the HBSPM was developed through a comprehensive literature review, expert consultation, and cognitive interviews. In May 2024, 701 older adults were recruited through stratified convenience sampling across from cities classified into three tiers according to their 2023 GDP levels in Guangdong Province. The validity of the HBSPM was assessed using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: The scale consists of 30 items across six dimensions: Susceptibility (5 items), Seriousness (6 items), Benefits (4 items), Barriers (5 items), Cues for Action (5 items), and Self-Efficacy (5 items). EFA revealed that these six factors accounted for 60.42% of the total variance. Factor loadings for the 30 items ranged from 0.615 to 0.759. The scale demonstrated good validity (χ²/df = 1.466, RMSEA = 0.045, TLI = 0.965, IFI = 0.961, NFI = 0.897, CFI = 0.965, GFI = 0.852, I-CVI > 0.86, S-CVI = 0.989) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.935). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the HBSPM is an effective tool for measuring health belief regarding sarcopenia prevention and management among older adults and provides a robust foundation for targeted health education and behavioral interventions.

肌少症预防与管理健康信念量表(HBSPM)的开发与验证:中国广东省老年人的试点研究
背景和目的:老年人肌肉减少症的患病率每年都在上升,这突出了提高预防肌肉减少症的意识和自我管理的重要性,这是一个关键的公共卫生优先事项。本研究旨在编制并验证老年人肌肉减少症预防与管理健康信念量表(HBSPM),并评估其信度和效度。方法:本研究分为两期进行。在健康信念模型(HBM)的指导下,通过全面的文献综述、专家咨询和认知访谈开发了健康信念模型。2024年5月,通过分层方便抽样,从广东省按2023年GDP水平分为三线的城市中招募了701名老年人。采用项目分析、探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)对HBSPM的效度进行评估。结果:量表包括敏感性(5项)、严重度(6项)、益处(4项)、障碍(5项)、行动提示(5项)和自我效能感(5项)6个维度共30个项目。EFA显示,这6个因素占总方差的60.42%。这30个项目的因子负荷范围从0.615到0.759。量表具有良好的效度(χ²/df = 1.466, RMSEA = 0.045, TLI = 0.965, IFI = 0.961, NFI = 0.897, CFI = 0.965, GFI = 0.852, I-CVI > 0.86, S-CVI = 0.989)和信度(Cronbach 's alpha = 0.935)。结论:HBSPM是衡量老年人预防和管理肌肉减少症健康信念的有效工具,为有针对性的健康教育和行为干预提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书