Alexandra Kroll, Annette Aldrich, Sandrine Andres, Carmen Casado-Martinez, Sabine Duquesne, Peter C von der Ohe, Marion Junghans
{"title":"One Substance, Multiple Assessments: How the Various European Environmental Risk Frameworks Affect the Outcome of Chemical Risk Assessments.","authors":"Alexandra Kroll, Annette Aldrich, Sandrine Andres, Carmen Casado-Martinez, Sabine Duquesne, Peter C von der Ohe, Marion Junghans","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Union (EU) regulates chemicals to protect the environment, but different regulations apply depending on the intended use of the substances in question. Advances in chemical monitoring have revealed inconsistencies in environmental risk assessments, prompting the European Commission to advocate for a \"one substance, one assessment\" (OS-OA) approach. As part of the EU Partnership for the Assessment of the Risk from Chemicals (PARC), this study examines the implementation and outcome of environmental risk assessments carried out within different regulatory frameworks, focusing on the aquatic environment. Using case studies on imidacloprid and deltamethrin, we highlight methodological differences and their implications for OS-OA. Our analysis reveals little consistency in the data used by assessments in different regulatory processes. This is partially due to the historical development of risk assessments. In addition, we show that new scientific data are not consistently incorporated into risk assessments, leading to delays and prolonged environmental risks. Finally, we demonstrate that low analytical sensitivities contribute to low detection rates in monitoring programs and hinder comparisons between prospective and retrospective risk assessments. Differences in data accessibility and validity assessments and lack of collaboration and varying involvement of Member States contribute to these inconsistencies and underscore the need for standardized methods. As a result of different data requirements, models, and protection goals, isolated risk assessments of the same substance lead to divergent outcomes. In cases where data gaps exist and safe uses cannot be demonstrated, we strongly recommend read-across of hazard assessments between regulations to support more efficient regulatory conclusions. In summary, our findings highlight the need for coherent regulation and risk assessment to improve environmental protection in the EU.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1608-1622"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The European Union (EU) regulates chemicals to protect the environment, but different regulations apply depending on the intended use of the substances in question. Advances in chemical monitoring have revealed inconsistencies in environmental risk assessments, prompting the European Commission to advocate for a "one substance, one assessment" (OS-OA) approach. As part of the EU Partnership for the Assessment of the Risk from Chemicals (PARC), this study examines the implementation and outcome of environmental risk assessments carried out within different regulatory frameworks, focusing on the aquatic environment. Using case studies on imidacloprid and deltamethrin, we highlight methodological differences and their implications for OS-OA. Our analysis reveals little consistency in the data used by assessments in different regulatory processes. This is partially due to the historical development of risk assessments. In addition, we show that new scientific data are not consistently incorporated into risk assessments, leading to delays and prolonged environmental risks. Finally, we demonstrate that low analytical sensitivities contribute to low detection rates in monitoring programs and hinder comparisons between prospective and retrospective risk assessments. Differences in data accessibility and validity assessments and lack of collaboration and varying involvement of Member States contribute to these inconsistencies and underscore the need for standardized methods. As a result of different data requirements, models, and protection goals, isolated risk assessments of the same substance lead to divergent outcomes. In cases where data gaps exist and safe uses cannot be demonstrated, we strongly recommend read-across of hazard assessments between regulations to support more efficient regulatory conclusions. In summary, our findings highlight the need for coherent regulation and risk assessment to improve environmental protection in the EU.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.