What’s in a name? Nomenclature inconsistencies in the corticotropin-releasing factor/hormone system across time and taxa

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
General and comparative endocrinology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ygcen.2026.114931
Brett M. Culbert , Nicholas J. Bernier
{"title":"What’s in a name? Nomenclature inconsistencies in the corticotropin-releasing factor/hormone system across time and taxa","authors":"Brett M. Culbert ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Bernier","doi":"10.1016/j.ygcen.2026.114931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of clear, consistent, and specific terminology is important for maximizing the accessibility of scientific knowledge across all academic disciplines, including endocrinology. Yet, the nomenclature used to describe the primary hypophysiotropic neuropeptide responsible for centrally regulating rates of corticosteroid synthesis in vertebrates is inconsistent. Researchers use the terms “corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)” and “corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)” at almost equal frequency. While this may seem relatively minor, it highlights broader nomenclature issues that exist within this important neuropeptide family. Indeed, most neuropeptides in this family have had multiple names since their initial discovery and/or are described using different names in different taxa. This creates considerable confusion among students and researchers unfamiliar with this literature. In this review, we provide a historical perspective addressing how and why the nomenclature for these neuropeptides has changed. We also provide context for why some inconsistencies (e.g., CRF vs CRH) will likely continue to persist. Overall, our goal is to increase accessibility and remove barriers which may discourage research on this important neuropeptide family.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12582,"journal":{"name":"General and comparative endocrinology","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 114931"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General and comparative endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016648026000584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of clear, consistent, and specific terminology is important for maximizing the accessibility of scientific knowledge across all academic disciplines, including endocrinology. Yet, the nomenclature used to describe the primary hypophysiotropic neuropeptide responsible for centrally regulating rates of corticosteroid synthesis in vertebrates is inconsistent. Researchers use the terms “corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)” and “corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)” at almost equal frequency. While this may seem relatively minor, it highlights broader nomenclature issues that exist within this important neuropeptide family. Indeed, most neuropeptides in this family have had multiple names since their initial discovery and/or are described using different names in different taxa. This creates considerable confusion among students and researchers unfamiliar with this literature. In this review, we provide a historical perspective addressing how and why the nomenclature for these neuropeptides has changed. We also provide context for why some inconsistencies (e.g., CRF vs CRH) will likely continue to persist. Overall, our goal is to increase accessibility and remove barriers which may discourage research on this important neuropeptide family.
名字里有什么?促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子/激素系统在不同时间和分类群中的命名不一致性。
使用清晰、一致和具体的术语对于最大限度地获取包括内分泌学在内的所有学科的科学知识非常重要。然而,用于描述在脊椎动物中负责中枢调节皮质类固醇合成速率的初级垂体神经肽的命名法是不一致的。研究人员使用“促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)”和“促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(CRH)”这两个术语的频率几乎相同。虽然这可能看起来相对较小,但它突出了这个重要神经肽家族中存在的更广泛的命名问题。事实上,这个家族中的大多数神经肽自最初发现以来都有多个名称,或者在不同的分类群中使用不同的名称来描述。这在不熟悉这一文献的学生和研究人员中造成了相当大的困惑。在这篇综述中,我们提供了一个历史的角度来解决如何以及为什么这些神经肽的命名法发生了变化。我们还提供了为什么一些不一致(例如,CRF与CRH)可能会继续存在的背景。总的来说,我们的目标是增加可及性并消除可能阻碍这一重要神经肽家族研究的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General and comparative endocrinology
General and comparative endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: General and Comparative Endocrinology publishes articles concerned with the many complexities of vertebrate and invertebrate endocrine systems at the sub-molecular, molecular, cellular and organismal levels of analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书