Effects of exercise regimens on balance ability in older patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2026.1793389
Xiangyue Liu, Mengjing Chang, Huiyun Yuan, Xuemei Zheng, Wenling Tian, Dongwen Li, Dongfa Liao, Lin Cui
{"title":"Effects of exercise regimens on balance ability in older patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Xiangyue Liu, Mengjing Chang, Huiyun Yuan, Xuemei Zheng, Wenling Tian, Dongwen Li, Dongfa Liao, Lin Cui","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2026.1793389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the optimal exercise regimen for improving balance and preventing severe falls in older patients with osteoporosis (OP). Four databases were searched until September 1, 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane ROB2. Outcomes included Berg Balance Scale (BBS, primary), timed up and go test (TUG), bone mineral density (BMD), one-leg stand test (OLS), and number of falls. A Bayesian network meta-analysis in R4.4.1/GeMTC synthesized effects, presented as MD (95% CrI) and ranked by SUCRA. Analysis of 22 RCTs (n=1538) versus usual care showed virtual reality (VR) most effective for BBS (MD 9.2, 95% CrI 7.2, 11; SUCRA 99.66%) and TUG (MD -4.6, 95% CrI -5.8, -3.3; SUCRA 98.51%); balance training+resistance training+aerobics (BT + RT + aerobics) best improved BMD (MD 0.016, 95% CrI 0.012, 0.020; SUCRA 72.38%); trampoline best improved OLS (MD 8.8, 95% CrI 1.7, 5.5; SUCRA 72.38%); RT most significantly reduced falls (MD 0.29, 95% CrI 0.100, 0.68; SUCRA 84.86%). For older OP patients, VR is most effective in improving overall balance and mobility, with reliable evidence. Combination training, trampoline, and RT exhibit potential benefits for BMD, OLS, and fall prevention, respectively. Due to the limited amount of evidence and network strength, however, these interventions cannot yet be considered definitive clinical recommendations. More high-quality direct comparisons are required for further validation in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1793389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2026.1793389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the optimal exercise regimen for improving balance and preventing severe falls in older patients with osteoporosis (OP). Four databases were searched until September 1, 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane ROB2. Outcomes included Berg Balance Scale (BBS, primary), timed up and go test (TUG), bone mineral density (BMD), one-leg stand test (OLS), and number of falls. A Bayesian network meta-analysis in R4.4.1/GeMTC synthesized effects, presented as MD (95% CrI) and ranked by SUCRA. Analysis of 22 RCTs (n=1538) versus usual care showed virtual reality (VR) most effective for BBS (MD 9.2, 95% CrI 7.2, 11; SUCRA 99.66%) and TUG (MD -4.6, 95% CrI -5.8, -3.3; SUCRA 98.51%); balance training+resistance training+aerobics (BT + RT + aerobics) best improved BMD (MD 0.016, 95% CrI 0.012, 0.020; SUCRA 72.38%); trampoline best improved OLS (MD 8.8, 95% CrI 1.7, 5.5; SUCRA 72.38%); RT most significantly reduced falls (MD 0.29, 95% CrI 0.100, 0.68; SUCRA 84.86%). For older OP patients, VR is most effective in improving overall balance and mobility, with reliable evidence. Combination training, trampoline, and RT exhibit potential benefits for BMD, OLS, and fall prevention, respectively. Due to the limited amount of evidence and network strength, however, these interventions cannot yet be considered definitive clinical recommendations. More high-quality direct comparisons are required for further validation in the future.

运动方案对老年骨质疏松患者平衡能力的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
确定老年骨质疏松症(OP)患者改善平衡和预防严重跌倒的最佳运动方案。搜索了四个数据库,直到2025年9月1日。采用Cochrane ROB2评估偏倚风险。结果包括Berg平衡量表(BBS,初级)、计时起跑测试(TUG)、骨密度(BMD)、单腿站立测试(OLS)和跌倒次数。R4.4.1/GeMTC的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析综合了效应,表示为MD (95% CrI),并按SUCRA排名。与常规治疗相比,22项rct (n=1538)分析显示,虚拟现实(VR)治疗BBS (MD 9.2, 95% CrI 7.2, 11; SUCRA 99.66%)和TUG (MD -4.6, 95% CrI -5.8, -3.3; SUCRA 98.51%)最有效;平衡训练+阻力训练+健美操(BT + RT +健美操)最能提高骨密度(MD 0.016, 95% CrI 0.012, 0.020;蹦床最能改善OLS (MD 8.8, 95% CrI 1.7, 5.5; SUCRA 72.38%);RT最显著地减少了跌倒(MD 0.29, 95% CrI 0.100, 0.68; SUCRA 84.86%)。有可靠证据表明,对于老年OP患者,VR在改善整体平衡和活动能力方面最有效。联合训练、蹦床和RT分别显示出对BMD、OLS和预防跌倒的潜在益处。然而,由于证据和网络力量有限,这些干预措施还不能被认为是明确的临床建议。需要更多高质量的直接比较来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书