Effects of exercise regimens on balance ability in older patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xiangyue Liu, Mengjing Chang, Huiyun Yuan, Xuemei Zheng, Wenling Tian, Dongwen Li, Dongfa Liao, Lin Cui
{"title":"Effects of exercise regimens on balance ability in older patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Xiangyue Liu, Mengjing Chang, Huiyun Yuan, Xuemei Zheng, Wenling Tian, Dongwen Li, Dongfa Liao, Lin Cui","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2026.1793389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the optimal exercise regimen for improving balance and preventing severe falls in older patients with osteoporosis (OP). Four databases were searched until September 1, 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane ROB2. Outcomes included Berg Balance Scale (BBS, primary), timed up and go test (TUG), bone mineral density (BMD), one-leg stand test (OLS), and number of falls. A Bayesian network meta-analysis in R4.4.1/GeMTC synthesized effects, presented as MD (95% CrI) and ranked by SUCRA. Analysis of 22 RCTs (n=1538) versus usual care showed virtual reality (VR) most effective for BBS (MD 9.2, 95% CrI 7.2, 11; SUCRA 99.66%) and TUG (MD -4.6, 95% CrI -5.8, -3.3; SUCRA 98.51%); balance training+resistance training+aerobics (BT + RT + aerobics) best improved BMD (MD 0.016, 95% CrI 0.012, 0.020; SUCRA 72.38%); trampoline best improved OLS (MD 8.8, 95% CrI 1.7, 5.5; SUCRA 72.38%); RT most significantly reduced falls (MD 0.29, 95% CrI 0.100, 0.68; SUCRA 84.86%). For older OP patients, VR is most effective in improving overall balance and mobility, with reliable evidence. Combination training, trampoline, and RT exhibit potential benefits for BMD, OLS, and fall prevention, respectively. Due to the limited amount of evidence and network strength, however, these interventions cannot yet be considered definitive clinical recommendations. More high-quality direct comparisons are required for further validation in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1793389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2026.1793389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To determine the optimal exercise regimen for improving balance and preventing severe falls in older patients with osteoporosis (OP). Four databases were searched until September 1, 2025. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane ROB2. Outcomes included Berg Balance Scale (BBS, primary), timed up and go test (TUG), bone mineral density (BMD), one-leg stand test (OLS), and number of falls. A Bayesian network meta-analysis in R4.4.1/GeMTC synthesized effects, presented as MD (95% CrI) and ranked by SUCRA. Analysis of 22 RCTs (n=1538) versus usual care showed virtual reality (VR) most effective for BBS (MD 9.2, 95% CrI 7.2, 11; SUCRA 99.66%) and TUG (MD -4.6, 95% CrI -5.8, -3.3; SUCRA 98.51%); balance training+resistance training+aerobics (BT + RT + aerobics) best improved BMD (MD 0.016, 95% CrI 0.012, 0.020; SUCRA 72.38%); trampoline best improved OLS (MD 8.8, 95% CrI 1.7, 5.5; SUCRA 72.38%); RT most significantly reduced falls (MD 0.29, 95% CrI 0.100, 0.68; SUCRA 84.86%). For older OP patients, VR is most effective in improving overall balance and mobility, with reliable evidence. Combination training, trampoline, and RT exhibit potential benefits for BMD, OLS, and fall prevention, respectively. Due to the limited amount of evidence and network strength, however, these interventions cannot yet be considered definitive clinical recommendations. More high-quality direct comparisons are required for further validation in the future.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.