The effects of shoulder extension angle on elbow flexor hypertrophy in the cable curl exercise.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2026-03-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2026.1750722
Stian Larsen, Benjamin Sandvik Kristiansen, Nordis Østerås Sandberg, Andrea Bao Fredriksen, Roland van den Tillaar, Milo Wolf, Paul Alan Swinton, Hallvard Nygaard Falch
{"title":"The effects of shoulder extension angle on elbow flexor hypertrophy in the cable curl exercise.","authors":"Stian Larsen, Benjamin Sandvik Kristiansen, Nordis Østerås Sandberg, Andrea Bao Fredriksen, Roland van den Tillaar, Milo Wolf, Paul Alan Swinton, Hallvard Nygaard Falch","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2026.1750722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This within-participant randomized study compared elbow flexor hypertrophy following cable curls performed in a neutral <i>versus</i> maximally extended shoulder position, with resistance profiles and elbow extension range of motion (ROM) matched between conditions. Thirty untrained men participated, with one arm assigned to train at the individualized peak shoulder extension angle and the contralateral arm at a neutral position. Twenty-four participants completed the intervention, which consisted of six to eight weekly sets of unilateral cable curls to momentary failure over 10 weeks under supervised conditions. Elbow flexor muscle thickness was assessed with ultrasonography at 50% and 70% of humerus length before and after the intervention. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) and quantify the strength of evidence with Bayes factors (BF). Both conditions produced increases in muscle thickness of approximately 7%-9%. Posterior distributions of the ATE were centered close to zero (Proximal/ATE<sub>Neutral:Peak</sub> = -0.40 [95% CrI: -1.06 to 0.26 mm]; Distal/ATE<sub>Neutral:Peak</sub> = 0.21 [95% CrI: -0.25-0.65 mm]), with BFs indicating anecdotal to moderate evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. These findings suggest that when resistance profiles, elbow ROM, and effort are matched, altering shoulder extension angle in isolation does not appear to produce meaningful differences in elbow flexor hypertrophy in untrained men over 10 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1750722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2026.1750722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This within-participant randomized study compared elbow flexor hypertrophy following cable curls performed in a neutral versus maximally extended shoulder position, with resistance profiles and elbow extension range of motion (ROM) matched between conditions. Thirty untrained men participated, with one arm assigned to train at the individualized peak shoulder extension angle and the contralateral arm at a neutral position. Twenty-four participants completed the intervention, which consisted of six to eight weekly sets of unilateral cable curls to momentary failure over 10 weeks under supervised conditions. Elbow flexor muscle thickness was assessed with ultrasonography at 50% and 70% of humerus length before and after the intervention. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) and quantify the strength of evidence with Bayes factors (BF). Both conditions produced increases in muscle thickness of approximately 7%-9%. Posterior distributions of the ATE were centered close to zero (Proximal/ATENeutral:Peak = -0.40 [95% CrI: -1.06 to 0.26 mm]; Distal/ATENeutral:Peak = 0.21 [95% CrI: -0.25-0.65 mm]), with BFs indicating anecdotal to moderate evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. These findings suggest that when resistance profiles, elbow ROM, and effort are matched, altering shoulder extension angle in isolation does not appear to produce meaningful differences in elbow flexor hypertrophy in untrained men over 10 weeks.

屈索运动中肩部伸展角度对肘关节屈肌肥大的影响。
这项参与者内随机研究比较了在中性和最大伸展肩部位置进行电缆卷曲后肘关节屈肌肥大,阻力曲线和肘关节伸展运动范围(ROM)在不同条件下匹配。30名未受过训练的男性参加了这项研究,其中一只手臂被分配在个性化的肩部伸展角峰值进行训练,而对侧手臂处于中立位置。24名参与者完成了干预,其中包括6至8周的单侧电缆卷曲,在监督条件下持续10周的瞬间失效。干预前后分别在肱骨长度的50%和70%处用超声检查评估肘关节屈肌厚度。采用贝叶斯框架估计平均治疗效果(ATE),并用贝叶斯因子(BF)量化证据强度。两种情况下肌肉厚度都增加了大约7%-9%。ATE的后向分布以接近零为中心(近端/ atenneutral:峰值= -0.40 [95% CrI: -1.06至0.26 mm];远端/ atenneutral:峰值= 0.21 [95% CrI: -0.25-0.65 mm]), BFs表明支持零假设的轶事到中等证据。这些研究结果表明,当阻力曲线、肘关节活动度和力度相匹配时,单独改变肩部伸展角度似乎不会对未经训练的男性肘关节屈肌肥大产生有意义的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书