Comparison of the effectiveness of psycho-behavioral-relaxation and occlusal splint therapy in the treatment of myalgia.

IF 4.3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anna Sójka-Makowska, Magdalena Łukaszewska-Kuska, Rafał Brożek, Magdalena Sobieska, Barbara Dorocka-Bobkowska
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of psycho-behavioral-relaxation and occlusal splint therapy in the treatment of myalgia.","authors":"Anna Sójka-Makowska, Magdalena Łukaszewska-Kuska, Rafał Brożek, Magdalena Sobieska, Barbara Dorocka-Bobkowska","doi":"10.17219/dmp/202962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current treatment for patients with myalgia comprises splint therapy (ST), cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT), psychological treatment, and education.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of relax-psycho-breathing therapy (RPB) and ST in women with myalgia, and to evaluate the efficacy of occlusal splint and/or behavioral therapy in the management of muscle pain.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study, designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT), involved 105 women aged 25-55 years with pain in the masticatory muscles during the 30 days prior to examination. Myalgia was diagnosed according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I. The clinical examination assessed muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain intensity, TMJ sounds, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and deviation in mouth opening and mandibular movement. After an initial assessment, at the 2nd visit (V2), the 25 patients from the 1st group were introduced to RPB: relaxation techniques; breathing patterns; psychological-behavioral instruction; muscle exercise therapy; puffing therapy; and self-massage. The 2nd group of patients received a custom-made, thermoplastic, flatplane relaxation splint placed on the mandible. The efficacy of treatment in all subjects was evaluated at 2 follow-up visits (V3 and V4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cases of muscle pain, pain during function, TMJ and muscle tenderness, and headache attributed to TMD, a statistically significant difference between the RPB and ST groups was observed only at the final follow-up visit. No significant differences between the 2 groups were found for MMO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reduction in myalgia following treatment suggests that both RPB exercises and ST are equally effective. However, considering the cost and duration of myalgia therapy, comprehensive care incorporating relaxation techniques may be a preferable first-line approach rather than ST alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"63 2","pages":"311-322"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/202962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current treatment for patients with myalgia comprises splint therapy (ST), cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT), psychological treatment, and education.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of relax-psycho-breathing therapy (RPB) and ST in women with myalgia, and to evaluate the efficacy of occlusal splint and/or behavioral therapy in the management of muscle pain.

Material and methods: The study, designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT), involved 105 women aged 25-55 years with pain in the masticatory muscles during the 30 days prior to examination. Myalgia was diagnosed according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I. The clinical examination assessed muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain intensity, TMJ sounds, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and deviation in mouth opening and mandibular movement. After an initial assessment, at the 2nd visit (V2), the 25 patients from the 1st group were introduced to RPB: relaxation techniques; breathing patterns; psychological-behavioral instruction; muscle exercise therapy; puffing therapy; and self-massage. The 2nd group of patients received a custom-made, thermoplastic, flatplane relaxation splint placed on the mandible. The efficacy of treatment in all subjects was evaluated at 2 follow-up visits (V3 and V4).

Results: In cases of muscle pain, pain during function, TMJ and muscle tenderness, and headache attributed to TMD, a statistically significant difference between the RPB and ST groups was observed only at the final follow-up visit. No significant differences between the 2 groups were found for MMO.

Conclusions: The reduction in myalgia following treatment suggests that both RPB exercises and ST are equally effective. However, considering the cost and duration of myalgia therapy, comprehensive care incorporating relaxation techniques may be a preferable first-line approach rather than ST alone.

心理-行为-放松疗法与咬合夹板疗法治疗肌痛的疗效比较。
背景:目前肌痛患者的治疗包括夹板治疗(ST)、认知行为治疗(CBT)、心理治疗和教育。目的:本研究的目的是比较放松-心理-呼吸疗法(RPB)和ST治疗女性肌痛的疗效,并评估咬合夹板和/或行为疗法治疗肌肉疼痛的疗效。材料和方法:该研究设计为随机对照试验(RCT),纳入105名年龄在25-55岁之间,在检查前30天出现咀嚼肌疼痛的女性。根据颞下颌关节疾病诊断标准(DC/TMD)轴1诊断肌痛,临床检查评估肌肉和颞下颌关节(TMJ)疼痛强度、TMJ声音、最大张嘴(MMO)、张嘴偏差和下颌运动。经过初步评估后,在第二次访问(V2)时,第一组的25名患者被引入RPB:放松技术;呼吸模式;psychological-behavioral指令;肌肉运动疗法;膨化疗法;和自我按摩。第二组患者接受定制的热塑性平面松弛夹板放置在下颌骨。2次随访(V3和V4)评估所有受试者的治疗效果。结果:在TMD引起的肌肉疼痛、功能疼痛、TMJ和肌肉压痛以及头痛的病例中,RPB组与ST组仅在最后随访时才观察到统计学差异。两组间MMO无显著差异。结论:治疗后肌痛的减少表明RPB锻炼和ST同样有效。然而,考虑到肌痛治疗的成本和持续时间,结合放松技术的综合护理可能是一个更好的一线方法,而不是单独的ST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书