Clinical Remission in Severe T2-High Asthma in Real Life After Anti-IgE, Anti-IL-5 and Anti-IL5R: A Potential Role for CRP as a Biomarker.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Jeanne Vervier, Marie Sabbe, France Louis, Catherine Moermans, Françoise Guissard, Carole Sanchez, Virginie Paulus, Monique Henket, Genevieve Philippe, Casper W H Beijnink, Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux, Florence Schleich, Renaud Louis
{"title":"Clinical Remission in Severe T2-High Asthma in Real Life After Anti-IgE, Anti-IL-5 and Anti-IL5R: A Potential Role for CRP as a Biomarker.","authors":"Jeanne Vervier, Marie Sabbe, France Louis, Catherine Moermans, Françoise Guissard, Carole Sanchez, Virginie Paulus, Monique Henket, Genevieve Philippe, Casper W H Beijnink, Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux, Florence Schleich, Renaud Louis","doi":"10.1002/clt2.70164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biotherapies have transformed the management of severe asthma (SA), shifting treatment goals from disease control toward achieving clinical remission. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of biotherapies in inducing remission in severe asthma and to identify baseline patient characteristics that could predict remission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, retrospective, monocentric study including severe T2-high asthmatic patients who had initiated their first biological therapy (omalizumab, mepolizumab or benralizumab) between 2006 and 2023. Clinical remission at 12 months was defined by the absence of exacerbations, no chronic oral corticosteroid use, and good symptom control (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 score < 1.5).</p><p><strong>Material: </strong>Data were extracted from the registry of our asthma clinic. We included 206 patients-97 treated with omalizumab, 71 with mepolizumab, and 38 with benralizumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 206 patients, 62 (30%) achieved remission at 12 months. The mean age was 52 years, and 39% were male. Remission rates were 29% for omalizumab, 28% for mepolizumab, and 37% for benralizumab. Patients achieving remission had better baseline lung function (pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1% predicted and FVC % predicted, p = 0.01), lower CRP levels (p = 0.01), earlier disease onset (p < 0.05), and were less likely to have a history of smoking (p < 0.01) and denied SABA and LAMA use compared to patients who did not achieve remission. Only CRP remained significant predictor after multiple logistic regression (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biological treatments with omalizumab, mepolizumab or benralizumab are capable of inducing clinical remission at 12 months in around one third of severe T2-high asthmatics. A low baseline CRP might be predictive of achieving remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"16 4","pages":"e70164"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13084146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.70164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biotherapies have transformed the management of severe asthma (SA), shifting treatment goals from disease control toward achieving clinical remission. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of biotherapies in inducing remission in severe asthma and to identify baseline patient characteristics that could predict remission.

Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, monocentric study including severe T2-high asthmatic patients who had initiated their first biological therapy (omalizumab, mepolizumab or benralizumab) between 2006 and 2023. Clinical remission at 12 months was defined by the absence of exacerbations, no chronic oral corticosteroid use, and good symptom control (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 score < 1.5).

Material: Data were extracted from the registry of our asthma clinic. We included 206 patients-97 treated with omalizumab, 71 with mepolizumab, and 38 with benralizumab.

Results: Of the 206 patients, 62 (30%) achieved remission at 12 months. The mean age was 52 years, and 39% were male. Remission rates were 29% for omalizumab, 28% for mepolizumab, and 37% for benralizumab. Patients achieving remission had better baseline lung function (pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1% predicted and FVC % predicted, p = 0.01), lower CRP levels (p = 0.01), earlier disease onset (p < 0.05), and were less likely to have a history of smoking (p < 0.01) and denied SABA and LAMA use compared to patients who did not achieve remission. Only CRP remained significant predictor after multiple logistic regression (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Biological treatments with omalizumab, mepolizumab or benralizumab are capable of inducing clinical remission at 12 months in around one third of severe T2-high asthmatics. A low baseline CRP might be predictive of achieving remission.

抗ige、抗il -5和抗il - 5r后现实生活中严重t2 -高哮喘的临床缓解:CRP作为生物标志物的潜在作用
背景:生物疗法已经改变了严重哮喘(SA)的管理,将治疗目标从疾病控制转向实现临床缓解。本研究旨在评估生物疗法在诱导严重哮喘缓解方面的有效性,并确定可以预测缓解的基线患者特征。方法:我们进行了一项观察性、回顾性、单中心研究,纳入了2006年至2023年间首次接受生物治疗(omalizumab、mepolizumab或benralizumab)的严重t2 -高哮喘患者。12个月的临床缓解定义为无加重,无慢性口服皮质类固醇使用,症状控制良好(哮喘控制测试评分≥20分和哮喘控制问卷-6评分)。资料:数据来自我们哮喘诊所的登记。我们纳入了206例患者,其中97例使用omalizumab, 71例使用mepolizumab, 38例使用benralizumab。结果:206例患者中,62例(30%)在12个月时达到缓解。平均年龄52岁,男性占39%。omalizumab的缓解率为29%,mepolizumab为28%,benralizumab为37%。获得缓解的患者有更好的基线肺功能(支气管扩张前和后FEV1%预测和FVC %预测,p = 0.01),更低的CRP水平(p = 0.01),更早的疾病发作(p)。结论:在大约三分之一的严重t2 -高哮喘患者中,使用omalizumab、mepolizumab或benralizumab进行生物治疗能够在12个月时诱导临床缓解。低基线CRP可能预示着病情的缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Clinical and Translational Allergy Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience. Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书