Machine learning-based clinical decision support tool for advanced ESCC in the immunotherapy era: a multi-center study.

IF 12.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Hui Bai, Xiaofeng Wang, Qifeng Wang, Jiacheng Li, Chengcheng Fan, Xiao Liu, Yujin Xu, Qin Xiao, Hao Zhang, Bingyi Wang, Qingsong Pang, Biqi Chen, Mian Xi, Zhiyong Yuan, Jianzhong Cao, Baoqing Chen, Wencheng Zhang
{"title":"Machine learning-based clinical decision support tool for advanced ESCC in the immunotherapy era: a multi-center study.","authors":"Hui Bai, Xiaofeng Wang, Qifeng Wang, Jiacheng Li, Chengcheng Fan, Xiao Liu, Yujin Xu, Qin Xiao, Hao Zhang, Bingyi Wang, Qingsong Pang, Biqi Chen, Mian Xi, Zhiyong Yuan, Jianzhong Cao, Baoqing Chen, Wencheng Zhang","doi":"10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to develop clinical decision support tools for patients with treatment-naïve advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received first-line immunochemotherapy with or without radiotherapy between 2018 and 2023 across 9 centers were included in the current study. Candidate predictors were routine clinical variables such as patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details. Feature selection was conducted using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), Boruta, and stepwise feature selection method. The models were fitted using 4 machine learning algorithms and a Cox proportional hazards model was set as a benchmark, comparing model predictive performance by computing the time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve (tAUC). Concordance index (C-index), Brier score, calibration plots, precision-recall (PR) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and held-out testing and external validation were utilized for evaluating model robustness, transportability, and clinical utility. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to rank feature importance and explain the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,048 patients were included, comprising the training/test (<i>n</i> = 828) and validation cohorts (<i>n</i> = 220). The random survival forest model that was constructed following feature selection using Boruta [Boruta-random survival forest (RSF)] showed the highest predictive performance. The tAUCs for 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS were 0.886, 0.775, and 0.772, respectively, in the training set, which significantly outperformed all other models (<i>P</i>-adjust < 0.05). This superiority persisted in the external validation cohort (all tAUCs > 0.750). The Boruta-RSF model exhibited excellent calibration and the highest clinical net benefit on DCA. A publicly accessible web calculator (https://escc.shinyapps.io/ESCC/) was implemented, enabling individualized overall survival prediction under varying treatment scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Boruta-RSF model, leveraging routinely available clinical variables with the corresponding web calculator, facilitates personalized prognostic assessment and optimization of treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9611,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to develop clinical decision support tools for patients with treatment-naïve advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods: Patients who received first-line immunochemotherapy with or without radiotherapy between 2018 and 2023 across 9 centers were included in the current study. Candidate predictors were routine clinical variables such as patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details. Feature selection was conducted using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), Boruta, and stepwise feature selection method. The models were fitted using 4 machine learning algorithms and a Cox proportional hazards model was set as a benchmark, comparing model predictive performance by computing the time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve (tAUC). Concordance index (C-index), Brier score, calibration plots, precision-recall (PR) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and held-out testing and external validation were utilized for evaluating model robustness, transportability, and clinical utility. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to rank feature importance and explain the models.

Results: A total of 1,048 patients were included, comprising the training/test (n = 828) and validation cohorts (n = 220). The random survival forest model that was constructed following feature selection using Boruta [Boruta-random survival forest (RSF)] showed the highest predictive performance. The tAUCs for 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS were 0.886, 0.775, and 0.772, respectively, in the training set, which significantly outperformed all other models (P-adjust < 0.05). This superiority persisted in the external validation cohort (all tAUCs > 0.750). The Boruta-RSF model exhibited excellent calibration and the highest clinical net benefit on DCA. A publicly accessible web calculator (https://escc.shinyapps.io/ESCC/) was implemented, enabling individualized overall survival prediction under varying treatment scenarios.

Conclusions: The Boruta-RSF model, leveraging routinely available clinical variables with the corresponding web calculator, facilitates personalized prognostic assessment and optimization of treatment strategies.

免疫治疗时代晚期ESCC基于机器学习的临床决策支持工具:一项多中心研究。
目的:我们旨在为treatment-naïve晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者开发临床决策支持工具。方法:本研究纳入了2018年至2023年间9个中心接受一线免疫化疗伴或不伴放疗的患者。候选预测因子是常规临床变量,如患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征和治疗细节。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)、Boruta和逐步特征选择方法进行特征选择。采用4种机器学习算法对模型进行拟合,并设置Cox比例风险模型作为基准,通过计算接受者操作符曲线下的时间相关面积(tAUC)来比较模型的预测性能。使用一致性指数(C-index)、Brier评分、校准图、精确召回率(PR)曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)、hold -out检验和外部验证来评估模型的稳健性、可移植性和临床实用性。使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析对特征重要性进行排序并解释模型。结果:共纳入1,048例患者,包括训练/测试组(n = 828)和验证组(n = 220)。采用Boruta [Boruta-random survival forest (RSF)]进行特征选择后构建的随机生存森林模型的预测性能最高。6个月、12个月和18个月OS的tAUCs分别为0.886、0.775和0.772,显著优于其他所有模型(P-adjust < 0.05)。这种优势在外部验证队列中持续存在(所有tauc均为0.750)。Boruta-RSF模型在DCA方面表现出良好的校准和最高的临床净效益。实施了一个可公开访问的网络计算器(https://escc.shinyapps.io/ESCC/),可以在不同的治疗方案下进行个性化的总体生存预测。结论:Boruta-RSF模型利用常规可用的临床变量和相应的网络计算器,有助于个性化预后评估和治疗策略的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Cancer Biology & Medicine Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1143
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Biology & Medicine (ISSN 2095-3941) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of Chinese Anti-cancer Association (CACA), which is the leading professional society of oncology in China. The journal quarterly provides innovative and significant information on biological basis of cancer, cancer microenvironment, translational cancer research, and all aspects of clinical cancer research. The journal also publishes significant perspectives on indigenous cancer types in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书