GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Semaglutide and SGLT2 Inhibitors after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Diabetes: Real-World Comparative Outcomes from an Observational Registry.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-04-14 DOI:10.1159/000551964
Ivana Jurin, Karlo Gjuras, Dijana Bešić, Hrvoje Jurin, Jelena Kursar, Tea-Terezija Cvetko, Fran Rode, Tomislav Šipić, Petar Lišnjić, Šime Manola, Kristina Marić Bešić, Jasmina Ćatić
{"title":"GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Semaglutide and SGLT2 Inhibitors after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Diabetes: Real-World Comparative Outcomes from an Observational Registry.","authors":"Ivana Jurin, Karlo Gjuras, Dijana Bešić, Hrvoje Jurin, Jelena Kursar, Tea-Terezija Cvetko, Fran Rode, Tomislav Šipić, Petar Lišnjić, Šime Manola, Kristina Marić Bešić, Jasmina Ćatić","doi":"10.1159/000551964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remain at high cardiovascular risk after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly after myocardial infarction (MI). Evidence on the early post-ACS use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), particularly semaglutide, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 870 patients in the registry-based T2D cohort discharged after ACS from the single-center Cardiology Research Dubrava (CaRD) registry (2017-2025). Patients were grouped according to discharge therapy: no GLP-1RA/SGLT2i, GLP-1RA only (semaglutide), SGLT2i only, or combined therapy. Descriptive outcomes included all-cause mortality and a broad registry composite of clinical events. To better address baseline imbalances and unequal group sizes, adjusted Cox models focused on conventional 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACEs: cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) and included age, sex, ACS type, estimated glomerular filtration rate, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 68 years, and 67.5% of participants were male. Discharge therapy included no GLP-1RA/SGLT2i (n = 484), GLP-1RA (n = 35), SGLT2i (n = 277), and combined GLP-1RA+SGLT2i (n = 74), indicating substantial imbalance in subgroup size. During a median follow-up of 37 months, all-cause mortality was highest in the control group (30.2%) and lowest with combined therapy (2.7%), in which no cardiovascular deaths were recorded. However, important baseline differences in BMI, HbA1c, LVEF, age, and socioeconomic characteristics were present across groups. In adjusted 3P-MACE models, adherence to GLP-1RA and/or SGLT2i was associated with lower risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.82, p = 0.003). When entered separately, SGLT2i remained significant (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.042), whereas GLP-1RA showed a similar direction of association but did not retain statistical significance (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.28-1.28, p = 0.189).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-center observational ACS registry, semaglutide and SGLT2i use were associated with more favorable cardiometabolic profiles and lower event rates after discharge. The apparent benefit of combined therapy should be interpreted cautiously because of small subgroup sizes. These results are hypothesis-generating and support further prospective evaluation of combined cardiometabolic therapy after ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9391,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remain at high cardiovascular risk after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly after myocardial infarction (MI). Evidence on the early post-ACS use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), particularly semaglutide, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) is limited.

Methods: We analyzed 870 patients in the registry-based T2D cohort discharged after ACS from the single-center Cardiology Research Dubrava (CaRD) registry (2017-2025). Patients were grouped according to discharge therapy: no GLP-1RA/SGLT2i, GLP-1RA only (semaglutide), SGLT2i only, or combined therapy. Descriptive outcomes included all-cause mortality and a broad registry composite of clinical events. To better address baseline imbalances and unequal group sizes, adjusted Cox models focused on conventional 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACEs: cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) and included age, sex, ACS type, estimated glomerular filtration rate, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Results: The median age was 68 years, and 67.5% of participants were male. Discharge therapy included no GLP-1RA/SGLT2i (n = 484), GLP-1RA (n = 35), SGLT2i (n = 277), and combined GLP-1RA+SGLT2i (n = 74), indicating substantial imbalance in subgroup size. During a median follow-up of 37 months, all-cause mortality was highest in the control group (30.2%) and lowest with combined therapy (2.7%), in which no cardiovascular deaths were recorded. However, important baseline differences in BMI, HbA1c, LVEF, age, and socioeconomic characteristics were present across groups. In adjusted 3P-MACE models, adherence to GLP-1RA and/or SGLT2i was associated with lower risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.82, p = 0.003). When entered separately, SGLT2i remained significant (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.042), whereas GLP-1RA showed a similar direction of association but did not retain statistical significance (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.28-1.28, p = 0.189).

Conclusion: In this single-center observational ACS registry, semaglutide and SGLT2i use were associated with more favorable cardiometabolic profiles and lower event rates after discharge. The apparent benefit of combined therapy should be interpreted cautiously because of small subgroup sizes. These results are hypothesis-generating and support further prospective evaluation of combined cardiometabolic therapy after ACS.

糖尿病患者急性冠脉综合征后GLP-1受体激动剂Semaglutide和SGLT2抑制剂:来自观察登记的真实世界比较结果
2型糖尿病(T2D)患者在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后,特别是在心肌梗死(MI)后,仍处于高心血管风险。acs后早期使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA),特别是semaglutide和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的证据有限。方法:我们分析了870例基于登记的T2D队列患者,这些患者来自单中心CaRD登记(2017-2025)。患者根据出院治疗进行分组:无GLP-1RA/SGLT2i、仅GLP-1RA (semaglutide)、仅SGLT2i或联合治疗。描述性结果包括全因死亡率和临床事件的广泛登记组合。为了更好地解决基线不平衡和不平等的组大小,调整后的Cox模型侧重于传统的3点主要心血管不良事件(p - mace:心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或非致死性卒中),包括年龄、性别、ACS类型、eGFR、BMI、LVEF、HbA1c和LDL-C。结果:中位年龄为68岁,67.5%的参与者为男性。出院治疗包括无GLP-1RA/SGLT2i (n = 484)、GLP-1RA (n = 35)、SGLT2i (n = 277)和GLP-1RA+SGLT2i联合治疗(n = 74),表明亚组大小存在明显的不平衡。在中位37个月的随访期间,对照组的全因死亡率最高(30.2%),联合治疗组的全因死亡率最低(2.7%),其中无心血管死亡记录。然而,各组之间在BMI、HbA1c、LVEF、年龄和社会经济特征方面存在重要的基线差异。在调整后的3P-MACE模型中,坚持GLP-1RA和/或SGLT2i与较低的风险相关(HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.82, p = 0.003)。当单独输入时,SGLT2i仍然显著(HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.042),而GLP-1RA显示类似的相关性方向,但不保持统计学意义(HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.28-1.28, p = 0.189)。结论:在这个单中心观察性ACS注册中,使用semaglutide和SGLT2i与出院后更有利的心脏代谢特征和更低的事件发生率相关。由于亚组规模小,联合治疗的明显益处应谨慎解释。这些结果产生了假设,并支持ACS后联合心脏代谢治疗的进一步前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology
Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ''Cardiology'' features first reports on original clinical, preclinical and fundamental research as well as ''Novel Insights from Clinical Experience'' and topical comprehensive reviews in selected areas of cardiovascular disease. ''Editorial Comments'' provide a critical but positive evaluation of a recent article. Papers not only describe but offer critical appraisals of new developments in non-invasive and invasive diagnostic methods and in pharmacologic, nutritional and mechanical/surgical therapies. Readers are thus kept informed of current strategies in the prevention, recognition and treatment of heart disease. Special sections in a variety of subspecialty areas reinforce the journal''s value as a complete record of recent progress for all cardiologists, internists, cardiac surgeons, clinical physiologists, pharmacologists and professionals in other areas of medicine interested in current activity in cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书