Lower Positive Body Pressure Walking Significantly Improves Pain and Function In Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.
Prakash Jayabalan, Yelyzaveta Merenzon, Audrey Lazar, Sanchita Sen, Vikram Darbhe, Elizabeth Gray, Thomas Schnitzer, Leah Welty
{"title":"Lower Positive Body Pressure Walking Significantly Improves Pain and Function In Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Prakash Jayabalan, Yelyzaveta Merenzon, Audrey Lazar, Sanchita Sen, Vikram Darbhe, Elizabeth Gray, Thomas Schnitzer, Leah Welty","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000003007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Body weight-supported (BWS) walking therapies, lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmills, or aquatic pool walking could provide a treatment to reduce pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Our objective was to examine the potential benefits of BWS for individuals with knee OA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Parallel group randomized clinical trial. Forty-nine (n=49) participants, aged above 50 with knee OA, were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) control (n=16), (2) aquatic (n=17), and (3) LBPP (n=16). Interventional groups had two 30-minute walking sessions for 8 weeks. The control group received no active treatment. The primary outcome was the change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-Pain from baseline to 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included other KOOS subscales, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), joint kinematics, and serum cytokine concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one participants completed the trial. Changes in KOOS-Pain from baseline to 8 weeks were statistically significant and clinically relevant in the LBPP group (15.3, 95% CI: 5.0, 25.6). Changes in the other groups were not statistically significant [aquatic 0.9 (95% CI: -7.8, 9.6); and control -3.3 (95% CI: -12.3, 5.7). Post hoc analyses indicated improvements were significantly larger with LBPP. This group improved in 6-MWT (58.9 m, 95% CI: 26.1, 91.7) and most KOOS subscales. Improvements in KOOS-Pain at 8 weeks in the LBPP group were associated with increased knee flexion ( P =0.02). Only the control group had significant increases in IL-1β ( P =0.04) and IL-1RA ( P =0.02) concentration at 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first randomized controlled trial of BWS for knee OA and showed the benefits of LBPP treadmill walking. Future, larger studies should assess the effect size, sustained benefits, and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1030-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000003007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Body weight-supported (BWS) walking therapies, lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) treadmills, or aquatic pool walking could provide a treatment to reduce pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Our objective was to examine the potential benefits of BWS for individuals with knee OA.
Design: Parallel group randomized clinical trial. Forty-nine (n=49) participants, aged above 50 with knee OA, were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) control (n=16), (2) aquatic (n=17), and (3) LBPP (n=16). Interventional groups had two 30-minute walking sessions for 8 weeks. The control group received no active treatment. The primary outcome was the change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-Pain from baseline to 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included other KOOS subscales, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), joint kinematics, and serum cytokine concentration.
Results: Forty-one participants completed the trial. Changes in KOOS-Pain from baseline to 8 weeks were statistically significant and clinically relevant in the LBPP group (15.3, 95% CI: 5.0, 25.6). Changes in the other groups were not statistically significant [aquatic 0.9 (95% CI: -7.8, 9.6); and control -3.3 (95% CI: -12.3, 5.7). Post hoc analyses indicated improvements were significantly larger with LBPP. This group improved in 6-MWT (58.9 m, 95% CI: 26.1, 91.7) and most KOOS subscales. Improvements in KOOS-Pain at 8 weeks in the LBPP group were associated with increased knee flexion ( P =0.02). Only the control group had significant increases in IL-1β ( P =0.04) and IL-1RA ( P =0.02) concentration at 8 weeks.
Conclusions: This is the first randomized controlled trial of BWS for knee OA and showed the benefits of LBPP treadmill walking. Future, larger studies should assess the effect size, sustained benefits, and cost-effectiveness.
目的:体重支撑(BWS)步行疗法,下体正压(LBPP)跑步机或水池步行可以提供一种治疗方法来减轻膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的疼痛。我们的目的是研究BWS对膝关节OA患者的潜在益处。设计:平行组随机临床试验。49名(n=49)年龄在bb0 - 50岁之间的膝关节OA患者,随机分为三组:(1)Control (n=16), (2)Aquatic (n=17)和(3)LBPP (n=16)。干预组进行两次30分钟的步行,持续8周。对照组不给予积极治疗。主要结局是膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)-疼痛从基线到8周的变化。次要结果包括其他oos量表、6分钟步行测试(6-MWT)、关节运动学和血清细胞因子浓度。结果:41名受试者完成了试验。LBPP组KOOS-Pain从基线到8周的变化具有统计学意义和临床相关性(15.3,95% CI 5.0,25.6)。其他组的变化无统计学意义(Aquatic为0.9(95% CI -7.8,9.6);对照组-3.3(95% CI -12.3,5.7)。事后分析表明,LBPP的改善明显更大。该组6-MWT(58.9m, 95% CI 26.1,91.7)和大多数kos量表均有改善。LBPP组8周时KOOS-Pain的改善与膝关节屈曲度增加相关(P=0.02)。只有对照组在8周时IL-1β(P=0.04)和IL-1RA(P=0.02)浓度显著升高。结论:这是首个BWS治疗膝关节OA的随机对照试验,显示了LBPP跑步机行走的益处。未来更大规模的研究应评估效应大小、持续效益和成本效益。
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).