Lauren T L Brown, Megan E Cull, Delaine Pereira, Perri M Grant, Louise M Winn
{"title":"Mind the Litter: The Critical Role of Intralitter Variables in Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology Research.","authors":"Lauren T L Brown, Megan E Cull, Delaine Pereira, Perri M Grant, Louise M Winn","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Animal models remain essential for understanding developmental toxicology, providing insights into how in utero exposures affect fetal and placental outcomes. Litter-bearing species are widely used due to their efficiency and reproducibility, but conventional approaches often summarize outcomes at the litter level, masking meaningful within-litter variability.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This review highlights three primary sources of intralitter variability: litter size, uterine implantation location, and fetal sex, and their influence on fetal and placental growth, mortality, and malformations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Larger litters restrict fetal growth through intrauterine competition, while toxicant-induced changes in litter size can obscure or exaggerate effects. Implantation location within uterine horns influences perfusion, nutrient delivery, and local exposure to hormones or toxicants, introducing spatially dependent vulnerability. Fetal sex further modifies responses, as male and female fetuses and placentas differ in growth trajectories, gene expression, and adaptive capacity, leading to sex-specific susceptibility to toxicants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ignoring these sources of variability risks overlooking subtle effects and vulnerable subpopulations, misinterpreting outcomes, and reducing the translational value of animal studies. We argue that incorporating intralitter variables into experimental design and statistical analyses enhances the accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of developmental toxicology research. By refining the use of animal models in line with the 3Rs framework, researchers can maximize the information gained per pregnancy and improve risk assessment for human maternal-fetal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"118 4","pages":"e70044"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13083546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Animal models remain essential for understanding developmental toxicology, providing insights into how in utero exposures affect fetal and placental outcomes. Litter-bearing species are widely used due to their efficiency and reproducibility, but conventional approaches often summarize outcomes at the litter level, masking meaningful within-litter variability.
Aim: This review highlights three primary sources of intralitter variability: litter size, uterine implantation location, and fetal sex, and their influence on fetal and placental growth, mortality, and malformations.
Discussion: Larger litters restrict fetal growth through intrauterine competition, while toxicant-induced changes in litter size can obscure or exaggerate effects. Implantation location within uterine horns influences perfusion, nutrient delivery, and local exposure to hormones or toxicants, introducing spatially dependent vulnerability. Fetal sex further modifies responses, as male and female fetuses and placentas differ in growth trajectories, gene expression, and adaptive capacity, leading to sex-specific susceptibility to toxicants.
Conclusion: Ignoring these sources of variability risks overlooking subtle effects and vulnerable subpopulations, misinterpreting outcomes, and reducing the translational value of animal studies. We argue that incorporating intralitter variables into experimental design and statistical analyses enhances the accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretability of developmental toxicology research. By refining the use of animal models in line with the 3Rs framework, researchers can maximize the information gained per pregnancy and improve risk assessment for human maternal-fetal health.
期刊介绍:
The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks.
Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.