A Comparative Study of Decision Tree, RNNs and CNNs for Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Cyber-Physical Power Systems

IF 0.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Zeeshan Haider, Dilshad Sabir, Laiq Khan, Zahid Ullah
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Decision Tree, RNNs and CNNs for Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Cyber-Physical Power Systems","authors":"Zeeshan Haider,&nbsp;Dilshad Sabir,&nbsp;Laiq Khan,&nbsp;Zahid Ullah","doi":"10.1049/cps2.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>External connectivity for smart grid involving internet, data equipment, relays and breakers is essential to provide reliable and secure power supply. However, their interconnectivity also makes the grid susceptible to external threats with potential to damage equipment and cause power supply disruptions and safety hazards like false data injection attacks (FDIAs). In this paper, intrusion detection for FDIAs is proposed using three approaches. (1) A stack-based model containing an expansion decision tree and neural network, (2) recurrent neural metworks (RNNs) and (3) convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The experiment evaluation is performed using a publicly available dataset of Mississippi State University and Oak Ridge Nation Laboratory. On the provided dataset, the top performance is achieved on image-based classification using ResNet-18 with accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 97%, 97%, 95% and 96%, respectively. The DNN-GRU framework achieved accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 88%, 78%, 72% and 75%, respectively. Similarly, a version of the stack model of expansion decision tree and neural network combination achieved accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 95%, 95%, 95% and 95%, respectively. Each of these proposed methods has different preprocessing steps with different results. ResNet 18 has outperformed the hybrid model and recurrent neural network in precision, recall, F1 score and accuracy, which results in correct predictions, better identifying true positives (recall), avoiding false positives (precision) and achieving a robust balance between them (F1 score).</p>","PeriodicalId":36881,"journal":{"name":"IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory and Applications","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cps2.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cps2.70047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

External connectivity for smart grid involving internet, data equipment, relays and breakers is essential to provide reliable and secure power supply. However, their interconnectivity also makes the grid susceptible to external threats with potential to damage equipment and cause power supply disruptions and safety hazards like false data injection attacks (FDIAs). In this paper, intrusion detection for FDIAs is proposed using three approaches. (1) A stack-based model containing an expansion decision tree and neural network, (2) recurrent neural metworks (RNNs) and (3) convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The experiment evaluation is performed using a publicly available dataset of Mississippi State University and Oak Ridge Nation Laboratory. On the provided dataset, the top performance is achieved on image-based classification using ResNet-18 with accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 97%, 97%, 95% and 96%, respectively. The DNN-GRU framework achieved accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 88%, 78%, 72% and 75%, respectively. Similarly, a version of the stack model of expansion decision tree and neural network combination achieved accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score of 95%, 95%, 95% and 95%, respectively. Each of these proposed methods has different preprocessing steps with different results. ResNet 18 has outperformed the hybrid model and recurrent neural network in precision, recall, F1 score and accuracy, which results in correct predictions, better identifying true positives (recall), avoiding false positives (precision) and achieving a robust balance between them (F1 score).

Abstract Image

决策树、rnn和cnn检测网络物理电力系统虚假数据注入攻击的比较研究
智能电网的外部连接涉及互联网、数据设备、继电器和断路器,对于提供可靠和安全的电力供应至关重要。然而,它们的互联性也使电网容易受到外部威胁的影响,这些威胁可能会损坏设备,并导致电力供应中断和虚假数据注入攻击(FDIAs)等安全隐患。本文采用三种方法对fdi进行入侵检测。(1)包含扩展决策树和神经网络的基于堆栈的模型,(2)循环神经网络(RNNs)和(3)卷积神经网络(cnn)。实验评估是使用密西西比州立大学和橡树岭国家实验室的公开数据集进行的。在提供的数据集上,使用ResNet-18进行基于图像的分类,准确率、精密度、召回率和F1分数分别达到97%、97%、95%和96%。DNN-GRU框架的准确率、精密度、召回率和F1得分分别为88%、78%、72%和75%。同样,一种扩展决策树与神经网络相结合的堆栈模型,准确率、精密度、召回率和F1分数分别达到95%、95%、95%和95%。每种提出的方法都有不同的预处理步骤和不同的结果。ResNet 18在精度、召回率、F1分数和准确性方面优于混合模型和递归神经网络,从而实现正确的预测,更好地识别真阳性(召回率),避免假阳性(精度),并实现两者之间的稳健平衡(F1分数)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory and Applications
IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory and Applications Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书