Industrial operationalisation of safe-and-sustainable-by-design from business case to launch

IF 6.6
Ayse Ay, Roberto Chinchilla, Tobias Moss, Joséphine Munsch, Catherine Colin, Carla Caldeira, Pierre-Emmanuel Dufils, Timo Melchin, Eva Hahn and Wendel Wohlleben
{"title":"Industrial operationalisation of safe-and-sustainable-by-design from business case to launch","authors":"Ayse Ay, Roberto Chinchilla, Tobias Moss, Joséphine Munsch, Catherine Colin, Carla Caldeira, Pierre-Emmanuel Dufils, Timo Melchin, Eva Hahn and Wendel Wohlleben","doi":"10.1039/D5SU00666J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The chemical industry stands at a pivotal crossroads in the global transition towards sustainability. While chemical industry creates essential innovations, it has high environmental impact, and must reimagine its operations, products, and value chains to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving regulatory and societal landscape. The safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) framework, especially in its latest revision, nudges chemical industry towards the embedding of sustainability and safety in innovation processes and facilitate having bridges between safety and sustainability experts. The SSbD approach supports the deployment of EU policies such as the Competitive Compass, The Green Deal and the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. While JRC has coined the term “SSbD framework”, the underlying principles are not new—the framework adds more rigor to practices that industry has long implemented through PSA and other risk-based methodologies. Yet, translating these principles into consistent practice across the sector remains a challenge. The practical implementation of SSbD principles remains uneven, with significant variation in how companies cover and operationalise SSbD principles. Here, we compare industrial practices across the chemical sector, including specialty chemicals, consumer products, and materials manufacturing, focusing on their internal guidelines and reporting structures to assess how SSbD approach is integrated, aligned with, or differs from these practices. These industrial practices offer valuable lessons in integrating sustainability into business strategy, managing trade-offs, and aligning current or future market and regulatory expectations. At the same time, we identify key gaps in existing SSbD approach, including the inconclusive integration of social dimensions, and a lack of practical tools for early-stage decision-making. We argue that a highly iterative, industry-informed SSbD guidance—grounded in real-world constraints and opportunities—is essential to accelerate adoption and impact of the revised SSbD framework. By bridging policy ambition and industrial reality, this article contributes to the ongoing developments in SSbD implementation in research and development processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74745,"journal":{"name":"RSC sustainability","volume":" 4","pages":" 1792-1807"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/su/d5su00666j?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/su/d5su00666j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chemical industry stands at a pivotal crossroads in the global transition towards sustainability. While chemical industry creates essential innovations, it has high environmental impact, and must reimagine its operations, products, and value chains to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving regulatory and societal landscape. The safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) framework, especially in its latest revision, nudges chemical industry towards the embedding of sustainability and safety in innovation processes and facilitate having bridges between safety and sustainability experts. The SSbD approach supports the deployment of EU policies such as the Competitive Compass, The Green Deal and the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. While JRC has coined the term “SSbD framework”, the underlying principles are not new—the framework adds more rigor to practices that industry has long implemented through PSA and other risk-based methodologies. Yet, translating these principles into consistent practice across the sector remains a challenge. The practical implementation of SSbD principles remains uneven, with significant variation in how companies cover and operationalise SSbD principles. Here, we compare industrial practices across the chemical sector, including specialty chemicals, consumer products, and materials manufacturing, focusing on their internal guidelines and reporting structures to assess how SSbD approach is integrated, aligned with, or differs from these practices. These industrial practices offer valuable lessons in integrating sustainability into business strategy, managing trade-offs, and aligning current or future market and regulatory expectations. At the same time, we identify key gaps in existing SSbD approach, including the inconclusive integration of social dimensions, and a lack of practical tools for early-stage decision-making. We argue that a highly iterative, industry-informed SSbD guidance—grounded in real-world constraints and opportunities—is essential to accelerate adoption and impact of the revised SSbD framework. By bridging policy ambition and industrial reality, this article contributes to the ongoing developments in SSbD implementation in research and development processes.

Abstract Image

安全及可持续设计的工业运作,从商业案例到推出
在全球向可持续发展过渡的过程中,化学工业正处于关键的十字路口。虽然化工行业创造了重要的创新,但它对环境的影响很大,必须重新构想其运营、产品和价值链,以满足快速发展的监管和社会环境的需求。安全与可持续设计(SSbD)框架,特别是其最新版本,推动了化工行业在创新过程中嵌入可持续性和安全性,并促进了安全和可持续性专家之间的桥梁。SSbD方法支持欧盟政策的部署,如竞争指南、绿色协议和可持续发展化学品战略。虽然JRC创造了“SSbD框架”这一术语,但其基本原则并不新鲜——该框架为行业长期以来通过PSA和其他基于风险的方法实施的实践增加了更多的严密性。然而,将这些原则转化为整个行业的一致实践仍然是一项挑战。SSbD原则的实际实施仍然参差不齐,公司在如何覆盖和实施SSbD原则方面存在显著差异。在这里,我们比较了化学行业的工业实践,包括特种化学品、消费品和材料制造,重点关注其内部指导方针和报告结构,以评估SSbD方法如何与这些实践相结合、一致或不同。这些行业实践为将可持续性整合到业务战略、管理权衡以及调整当前或未来的市场和监管预期提供了宝贵的经验。与此同时,我们发现了现有SSbD方法的主要差距,包括社会层面的不确定性整合,以及缺乏早期决策的实用工具。我们认为,一个高度迭代的、了解行业的SSbD指南——以现实世界的限制和机会为基础——对于加速采用和影响修订后的SSbD框架至关重要。通过弥合政策抱负和工业现实,本文有助于在研究和开发过程中实施SSbD的持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书