Chemical recycling: a new toolbox for materials recycling in industry and the application of the mass balance chain-of-custody approach

IF 6.6
Christian Krueger, Ivana Krkljuš and Jenny Reuber
{"title":"Chemical recycling: a new toolbox for materials recycling in industry and the application of the mass balance chain-of-custody approach","authors":"Christian Krueger, Ivana Krkljuš and Jenny Reuber","doi":"10.1039/D5SU00505A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The chemical sector continues to rely predominantly on fossil-based carbon sources, resulting in substantial waste generation throughout its value chains and contributing notably to greenhouse gas emissions. Increasing circularity in chemical value chains is therefore critical to meet climate and sustainability objectives (SDG 12, SDG 13), but progress is constrained by heterogeneous waste streams, limited recycling infrastructure, and unclear accounting rules for recycled feedstocks. This paper assesses the technical potential, economic implications and governance requirements of chemical recycling and mass balance chain-of-custody (CoC) models to scale the use of waste-derived feedstocks in integrated petrochemical systems. Using a literature review we characterise technology trade-offs and introduce a Cost Multiplier Index (CMI) to quantify how proportional <em>versus</em> non-proportional mass balance attribution affects off-taker costs. We also evaluate policy and Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) implications considering current EU regulatory developments (<em>e.g.</em>, SUPD) and certification schemes (ISCC PLUS, REDcert<small><sup>2</sup></small>). Key findings are: (1) no single recycling technology fits all waste types—mechanical recycling is most effective for clean single streams, while chemical and thermochemical routes are required for mixed or contaminated wastes; (2) mass balance CoC enables rapid scale-up of recycled feedstock use without expensive physical segregation, but attribution rules and credit losses materially affect downstream costs and commercial viability; (3) the CMI demonstrates strong economic sensitivity – strict proportional attribution can substantially increase off-taker costs compared with targeted non-proportional approaches; and (4) robust MRV, third-party verification and clearly specified regulatory rules (including treatment of fuel use) are essential to avoid double counting, limit leakage and mobilise investment. Well-designed mass balance frameworks, combined with technology-open policy and harmonised MRV, can unlock significant volumes of recycled feedstock and accelerate the chemical industry's transition to a more circular, low-carbon future. These outcomes support SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production) and SDG 13 (climate action).</p>","PeriodicalId":74745,"journal":{"name":"RSC sustainability","volume":" 4","pages":" 1778-1791"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/su/d5su00505a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/su/d5su00505a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chemical sector continues to rely predominantly on fossil-based carbon sources, resulting in substantial waste generation throughout its value chains and contributing notably to greenhouse gas emissions. Increasing circularity in chemical value chains is therefore critical to meet climate and sustainability objectives (SDG 12, SDG 13), but progress is constrained by heterogeneous waste streams, limited recycling infrastructure, and unclear accounting rules for recycled feedstocks. This paper assesses the technical potential, economic implications and governance requirements of chemical recycling and mass balance chain-of-custody (CoC) models to scale the use of waste-derived feedstocks in integrated petrochemical systems. Using a literature review we characterise technology trade-offs and introduce a Cost Multiplier Index (CMI) to quantify how proportional versus non-proportional mass balance attribution affects off-taker costs. We also evaluate policy and Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) implications considering current EU regulatory developments (e.g., SUPD) and certification schemes (ISCC PLUS, REDcert2). Key findings are: (1) no single recycling technology fits all waste types—mechanical recycling is most effective for clean single streams, while chemical and thermochemical routes are required for mixed or contaminated wastes; (2) mass balance CoC enables rapid scale-up of recycled feedstock use without expensive physical segregation, but attribution rules and credit losses materially affect downstream costs and commercial viability; (3) the CMI demonstrates strong economic sensitivity – strict proportional attribution can substantially increase off-taker costs compared with targeted non-proportional approaches; and (4) robust MRV, third-party verification and clearly specified regulatory rules (including treatment of fuel use) are essential to avoid double counting, limit leakage and mobilise investment. Well-designed mass balance frameworks, combined with technology-open policy and harmonised MRV, can unlock significant volumes of recycled feedstock and accelerate the chemical industry's transition to a more circular, low-carbon future. These outcomes support SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production) and SDG 13 (climate action).

Abstract Image

化学回收:工业材料回收的新工具箱和质量平衡监管链方法的应用
化工行业继续主要依赖化石碳源,导致其整个价值链产生大量废物,并显著增加温室气体排放。因此,提高化学品价值链的循环性对于实现气候和可持续发展目标(可持续发展目标12和13)至关重要,但进展受到异质性废物流、有限的回收基础设施和不明确的回收原料会计规则的限制。本文评估了化学回收和质量平衡监管链(CoC)模型的技术潜力、经济影响和治理要求,以扩大综合石化系统中废物来源原料的使用。通过文献综述,我们描述了技术权衡的特征,并引入了成本乘数指数(CMI)来量化比例与非比例质量平衡归因对承购方成本的影响。考虑到当前欧盟法规发展(例如,SUPD)和认证计划(ISCC PLUS, REDcert2),我们还评估了政策和监测、报告和验证(MRV)的影响。主要发现是:(1)没有一种单一回收技术适用于所有废物类型——机械回收对清洁的单一废物最有效,而化学和热化学回收途径则需要混合或污染废物;(2)质量平衡CoC能够快速扩大再生原料的使用规模,而无需昂贵的物理隔离,但归属规则和信用损失严重影响下游成本和商业可行性;(3) CMI具有较强的经济敏感性,严格的比例归因比有针对性的非比例归因能显著增加承购方的成本;(4)健全的MRV、第三方核查和明确规定的监管规则(包括燃料使用处理)对于避免重复计算、限制泄漏和调动投资至关重要。精心设计的质量平衡框架,结合技术开放政策和统一的MRV,可以释放大量的回收原料,加速化工行业向更循环、更低碳的未来过渡。这些成果支持可持续发展目标12(负责任的消费和生产)和可持续发展目标13(气候行动)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书