AI-based development of a portfolio of indicators for assessing environmental, social and economic impacts and technological functionality of chemicals and materials

IF 6.6
Lisa Pizzol, Gloria Fortin, Arianna Livieri, Fabio Rosada, Sarah Devecchi, Elena Semenzin and Danail Hristozov
{"title":"AI-based development of a portfolio of indicators for assessing environmental, social and economic impacts and technological functionality of chemicals and materials","authors":"Lisa Pizzol, Gloria Fortin, Arianna Livieri, Fabio Rosada, Sarah Devecchi, Elena Semenzin and Danail Hristozov","doi":"10.1039/D5SU00883B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Center (JRC) Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) framework (JRC-SSbD framework) has highlighted the importance of assessing safety and sustainability as early as possible in the innovation process and in a pragmatic way. This has created the need to operationalise the framework with cost-effective methods and tools for simplified sustainability assessment. The development of such approaches is not a straightforward task: it requires integration of diverse technical indicators for life cycle assessment of environmental, social and economic impacts. Despite intensive ongoing work in EU research and innovation projects, a comprehensive inventory of such indicators is not yet available. To address this gap, our study employed an AI (Artificial Intelligence)-driven knowledge extraction process to compile an extensive portfolio of 986 environmental, social, economic and functionality indicators grouped in 103 categories relevant for both chemicals and materials. The AI output required substantial human expert intervention, as the categorisation process proved inaccurate across several indicators. In addition, an approach for statistical data analysis was developed and applied to prioritise which indicators should be considered first in simplified sustainability assessments. We expect that this work will have important contribution towards the operationalisation of the JRC-SSbD framework and can help companies to anticipate which information they need to collect to assess the sustainability and functionality of their products, already in the early stages of product development. This can reduce the overall Research and Development and Innovation (R&amp;D&amp;I) costs of the European industries and increase their competitiveness in the transition to a greener economy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74745,"journal":{"name":"RSC sustainability","volume":" 4","pages":" 1717-1730"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/su/d5su00883b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/su/d5su00883b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Center (JRC) Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) framework (JRC-SSbD framework) has highlighted the importance of assessing safety and sustainability as early as possible in the innovation process and in a pragmatic way. This has created the need to operationalise the framework with cost-effective methods and tools for simplified sustainability assessment. The development of such approaches is not a straightforward task: it requires integration of diverse technical indicators for life cycle assessment of environmental, social and economic impacts. Despite intensive ongoing work in EU research and innovation projects, a comprehensive inventory of such indicators is not yet available. To address this gap, our study employed an AI (Artificial Intelligence)-driven knowledge extraction process to compile an extensive portfolio of 986 environmental, social, economic and functionality indicators grouped in 103 categories relevant for both chemicals and materials. The AI output required substantial human expert intervention, as the categorisation process proved inaccurate across several indicators. In addition, an approach for statistical data analysis was developed and applied to prioritise which indicators should be considered first in simplified sustainability assessments. We expect that this work will have important contribution towards the operationalisation of the JRC-SSbD framework and can help companies to anticipate which information they need to collect to assess the sustainability and functionality of their products, already in the early stages of product development. This can reduce the overall Research and Development and Innovation (R&D&I) costs of the European industries and increase their competitiveness in the transition to a greener economy.

Abstract Image

为评估化学品和材料的环境、社会和经济影响以及技术功能制定一套基于人工智能的指标组合
欧盟委员会(EC)联合研究中心(JRC)的安全与可持续设计(SSbD)框架(JRC-SSbD框架)强调了在创新过程中尽早以务实的方式评估安全性和可持续性的重要性。这就需要采用成本效益高的方法和工具来实施框架,以简化可持续性评估。制订这种办法不是一项直截了当的任务:它需要综合各种技术指标,以便对环境、社会和经济影响进行生命周期评价。尽管欧盟的研究和创新项目正在进行密集的工作,但目前还没有这些指标的全面清单。为了解决这一差距,我们的研究采用了人工智能(AI)驱动的知识提取过程,编制了986个环境、社会、经济和功能指标的广泛组合,这些指标分为103个类别,与化学品和材料相关。人工智能的输出需要大量的人类专家干预,因为在几个指标上的分类过程被证明是不准确的。此外,还制订了一种统计数据分析方法,并加以应用,以确定在简化的可持续性评价中应优先考虑哪些指标。我们期望这项工作将对JRC-SSbD框架的运作做出重要贡献,并可以帮助公司在产品开发的早期阶段预测他们需要收集哪些信息来评估其产品的可持续性和功能。这可以降低欧洲工业的整体研发和创新(R&D&;I)成本,并提高它们在向绿色经济转型中的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书