The status of extracellular vesicles as drug carriers and therapeutics

IF 42.7
Ameya P. Chaudhari, Omar M. Budayr, Emily E. Bonacquisti, Caden C. Kussatz, Mark S. Bannon, Karissa J. Law, Yusha Liu, Matthew L. Bolton, Patrick M. Glassman, Leaf Huang, Juliane Nguyen
{"title":"The status of extracellular vesicles as drug carriers and therapeutics","authors":"Ameya P. Chaudhari, Omar M. Budayr, Emily E. Bonacquisti, Caden C. Kussatz, Mark S. Bannon, Karissa J. Law, Yusha Liu, Matthew L. Bolton, Patrick M. Glassman, Leaf Huang, Juliane Nguyen","doi":"10.1038/s44222-026-00405-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owing to their natural origin and biocompatibility, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are being recognized as next-generation vehicles for targeted drug delivery. Despite their potential as therapeutic carriers, EVs suffer from heterogeneity, low yields, limited cargo loading efficiency and rapid clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system. Since the first EV-based clinical trial in 2005, more than 100 clinical trials have investigated the use of EVs as therapeutics and drug carriers. Despite this, no EV-based therapies have received regulatory approval to date. This gap between preclinical research activity and clinical translation underscores persistent scientific challenges and regulatory hurdles that continue to impede the advancement of EV-based therapeutics. In this Review, we examine the research articles published in the field between 2012 and 2024 (38,177 articles), highlighting key developments, persistent challenges and evolving assumptions. We review the current EV landscape and clinical trials, focusing on their organotropism and use as carriers for therapeutics. We compare their advantages and limitations in relation to other nanoparticles, such as lipid nanoparticles and liposomes, and examine how labelling strategies and cell sources influence EV biodistribution. Finally, we outline translational considerations for EV-based therapeutics and propose additional reporting standards, complementing the MISEV 2023 guidelines. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as biocompatible carriers for targeted drug delivery, yet challenges in yield, cargo loading and biodistribution persist. In this Review, key trends from over a decade of research are analysed, comparing EVs with lipid-based systems and outlining strategies for improving therapeutic translation and reporting standards.","PeriodicalId":74248,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews bioengineering","volume":"4 4","pages":"301-318"},"PeriodicalIF":42.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44222-026-00405-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Owing to their natural origin and biocompatibility, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are being recognized as next-generation vehicles for targeted drug delivery. Despite their potential as therapeutic carriers, EVs suffer from heterogeneity, low yields, limited cargo loading efficiency and rapid clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system. Since the first EV-based clinical trial in 2005, more than 100 clinical trials have investigated the use of EVs as therapeutics and drug carriers. Despite this, no EV-based therapies have received regulatory approval to date. This gap between preclinical research activity and clinical translation underscores persistent scientific challenges and regulatory hurdles that continue to impede the advancement of EV-based therapeutics. In this Review, we examine the research articles published in the field between 2012 and 2024 (38,177 articles), highlighting key developments, persistent challenges and evolving assumptions. We review the current EV landscape and clinical trials, focusing on their organotropism and use as carriers for therapeutics. We compare their advantages and limitations in relation to other nanoparticles, such as lipid nanoparticles and liposomes, and examine how labelling strategies and cell sources influence EV biodistribution. Finally, we outline translational considerations for EV-based therapeutics and propose additional reporting standards, complementing the MISEV 2023 guidelines. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as biocompatible carriers for targeted drug delivery, yet challenges in yield, cargo loading and biodistribution persist. In this Review, key trends from over a decade of research are analysed, comparing EVs with lipid-based systems and outlining strategies for improving therapeutic translation and reporting standards.

Abstract Image

细胞外囊泡作为药物载体和治疗手段的地位
由于其天然来源和生物相容性,细胞外囊泡(ev)正被认为是靶向药物递送的下一代载体。尽管它们具有作为治疗载体的潜力,但电动汽车存在异质性、产量低、载货效率有限以及被单核吞噬细胞系统快速清除的问题。自2005年首次开展基于ev的临床试验以来,已有100多项临床试验调查了ev作为治疗手段和药物载体的使用。尽管如此,迄今为止还没有任何基于ev的疗法获得监管部门的批准。临床前研究活动和临床转化之间的差距凸显了持续存在的科学挑战和监管障碍,这些挑战和障碍继续阻碍着基于ev的治疗方法的发展。在本综述中,我们研究了2012年至2024年间在该领域发表的研究文章(38,177篇),突出了关键的发展、持续的挑战和不断发展的假设。我们回顾了目前EV的现状和临床试验,重点关注它们的器官亲和性和作为治疗载体的应用。我们比较了它们与其他纳米颗粒(如脂质纳米颗粒和脂质体)的优势和局限性,并研究了标记策略和细胞来源如何影响EV的生物分布。最后,我们概述了基于ev的治疗方法的翻译考虑因素,并提出了额外的报告标准,以补充MISEV 2023指南。细胞外囊泡(EVs)正在成为靶向药物递送的生物相容性载体,但在产量、货物装载和生物分布方面仍然存在挑战。在这篇综述中,分析了十多年来研究的主要趋势,将ev与基于脂质的系统进行了比较,并概述了改善治疗转化和报告标准的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书