求助PDF
{"title":"A Strong Structural Stability of \n \n \n \n \n C\n \n 2\n k\n +\n 1\n \n \n \n \n -Free Graphs","authors":"Zilong Yan, Yuejian Peng","doi":"10.1002/jgt.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Füredi and Gunderson showed that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mi>x</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is achieved only on <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌊</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌋</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>⌈</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌉</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. It is natural to study how far a <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free graph is from being bipartite. If a graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and a graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> have at most one vertex in common and there is no edge connecting <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∩</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∩</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, then we call graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> a suspension to graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∩</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> suspension point. Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> be obtained by adding a suspension <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> with 1 suspension point to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌊</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌋</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>⌈</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌉</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>min</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>{</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mo>:</mo>\n \n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>⊆</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>T</mi>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mstyle>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mtext>is bipartite</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n </mstyle>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>}</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>γ</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>min</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>{</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mo>:</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n \n <mo>⊆</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mstyle>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mtext>is bipartite</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n </mstyle>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>}</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Ren, Wang, Wang, and Yang showed that if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is an <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-vertex <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free graph with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, then <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>γ</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌈</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌉</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌊</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌋</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, and equalities hold if and only if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>3</mn>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mn>318</mn>\n \n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. In this paper, we show that for integers <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>3</mn>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mn>20</mn>\n \n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is a <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-vertex graph with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, then <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is obtained by adding suspensions to a ‘nearly balanced complete’ bipartite graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> one by one and the number of vertices not in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is no more than <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Furthermore, the total number of vertices not in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> equals <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> if and only if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Roughly speaking, we give a strong structural information for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> rather than the distance from being bipartite when <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mi>x</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>O</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>O</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mn>1</mn>\n \n <mn>3</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </msup>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. In the proof, we introduce a new concept strong-<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-core which is the key that we can give a stronger structural stability result but a simpler proof.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Graph Theory","volume":"112 2","pages":"151-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Graph Theory","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgt.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Füredi and Gunderson showed that
e
x
(
n
,
C
2
k
+
1
)
is achieved only on
K
⌊
n
2
⌋
,
⌈
n
2
⌉
if
n
≥
4
k
−
2
. It is natural to study how far a
C
2
k
+
1
-free graph is from being bipartite. If a graph
G
and a graph
H
have at most one vertex in common and there is no edge connecting
V
(
G
)
−
V
(
G
)
∩
V
(
H
)
and
V
(
H
)
−
V
(
G
)
∩
V
(
H
)
, then we call graph
H
a suspension to graph
G
with
∣
V
(
G
)
∩
V
(
H
)
∣
suspension point. Let
T
*
(
r
,
n
)
be obtained by adding a suspension
K
r
with 1 suspension point to
K
⌊
n
−
r
+
1
2
⌋
,
⌈
n
−
r
+
1
2
⌉
. Let
d
2
(
G
)
=
min
{
∣
T
∣
:
T
⊆
V
(
G
)
,
G
−
T
is bipartite
}
and
γ
2
(
G
)
=
min
{
∣
E
∣
:
E
⊆
E
(
G
)
,
G
−
E
is bipartite
}
. Ren, Wang, Wang, and Yang showed that if
G
is an
n
-vertex
C
2
k
+
1
-free graph with
e
(
G
)
≥
(
n
−
r
+
1
)
2
4
+
r
2
, then
d
2
(
G
)
≤
r
−
2
and
γ
2
(
G
)
≤
⌈
r
2
⌉
2
+
⌊
r
2
⌋
2
, and equalities hold if and only if
G
=
T
*
(
r
,
n
)
for
3
≤
r
≤
2
k
and
n
≥
318
(
r
−
2
)
2
k
. In this paper, we show that for integers
r
,
k
with
3
≤
r
≤
2
k
−
4
and
n
≥
20
(
r
+
2
)
2
k
, if
G
is a
C
2
k
+
1
-free
n
-vertex graph with
e
(
G
)
≥
e
(
T
*
(
r
,
n
)
)
, then
G
is obtained by adding suspensions to a ‘nearly balanced complete’ bipartite graph
G
[
V
1
,
V
2
]
one by one and the number of vertices not in
G
[
V
1
,
V
2
]
is no more than
r
−
1
. Furthermore, the total number of vertices not in
G
[
V
1
,
V
2
]
equals
r
−
1
if and only if
G
=
T
*
(
r
,
n
)
. Roughly speaking, we give a strong structural information for
C
2
k
+
1
-free graph
G
rather than the distance from being bipartite when
e
x
(
n
,
C
2
k
+
1
)
−
e
(
G
)
=
O
(
n
k
)
if
k
=
O
(
n
1
3
)
. In the proof, we introduce a new concept strong-
2
k
-core which is the key that we can give a stronger structural stability result but a simpler proof.
c2k + 1自由图的强结构稳定性
fredi和Gunderson证明了ex (n)c2k + 1)只在K⌊n2上实现⌋ ,(n²N≥4 k−2。研究一个c2k + 1自由图离由两部分构成的。如果一个图G和一个图H有最多一个共同的顶点并且没有连接V的边(g)−v (g)∩v(H)和V (H)−v (g)∩v (h)),则称之为图 fredi和Gunderson证明了ex (n)c2k + 1)只在K⌊n2上实现⌋ ,(n²N≥4 k−2。研究一个c2k + 1自由图离由两部分构成的。 如果一个图G和一个图H有最多一个共同的顶点并且没有连接V的边(g)−v (g)∩v(H)和V (H)−v (g)∩v (h)) ,那么我们称图H为图G(∣V)的悬架(G)∩V (H)∣悬浮点。 设T * (r)n)加一个悬浮K r,悬浮点为1,得到K⌊n−r+ 1 2⌋,(n−r +1 . 2; 设d2 (G) = min{∣t∣:T⊥(g);G−T是二部的}γ 2 (G) =min{∣E∣:E≤(g);G−E是二部的}。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。