A Strong Structural Stability of C 2 k + 1 -Free Graphs

IF 1 3区 数学 Q2 MATHEMATICS
Journal of Graph Theory Pub Date : 2026-04-13 Epub Date: 2026-03-19 DOI:10.1002/jgt.70022
Zilong Yan, Yuejian Peng
{"title":"A Strong Structural Stability of \n \n \n \n \n C\n \n 2\n k\n +\n 1\n \n \n \n \n -Free Graphs","authors":"Zilong Yan,&nbsp;Yuejian Peng","doi":"10.1002/jgt.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Füredi and Gunderson showed that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mi>x</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is achieved only on <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌊</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌋</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>⌈</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌉</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. It is natural to study how far a <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free graph is from being bipartite. If a graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and a graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> have at most one vertex in common and there is no edge connecting <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∩</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∩</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, then we call graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> a suspension to graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∩</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>H</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> suspension point. Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> be obtained by adding a suspension <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> with 1 suspension point to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌊</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌋</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>⌈</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌉</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>min</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>{</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mo>:</mo>\n \n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>⊆</mo>\n \n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>T</mi>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mstyle>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mtext>is bipartite</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n </mstyle>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>}</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>γ</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>min</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>{</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n \n <mo>∣</mo>\n \n <mo>:</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n \n <mo>⊆</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>E</mi>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mstyle>\n <mspace></mspace>\n \n <mtext>is bipartite</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n </mstyle>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>}</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Ren, Wang, Wang, and Yang showed that if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is an <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-vertex <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free graph with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, then <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>γ</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌈</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌉</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mfenced>\n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mo>⌊</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n \n <mo>⌋</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, and equalities hold if and only if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>3</mn>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mn>318</mn>\n \n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. In this paper, we show that for integers <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>3</mn>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>≤</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mn>20</mn>\n \n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is a <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-vertex graph with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>≥</mo>\n \n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, then <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is obtained by adding suspensions to a ‘nearly balanced complete’ bipartite graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> one by one and the number of vertices not in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is no more than <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Furthermore, the total number of vertices not in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>[</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>V</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>]</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> equals <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> if and only if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>T</mi>\n \n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>r</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. Roughly speaking, we give a strong structural information for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-free graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> rather than the distance from being bipartite when <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mi>x</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mi>e</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>O</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> if <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>=</mo>\n \n <mi>O</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <msup>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mn>1</mn>\n \n <mn>3</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </msup>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. In the proof, we introduce a new concept strong-<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-core which is the key that we can give a stronger structural stability result but a simpler proof.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Graph Theory","volume":"112 2","pages":"151-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Graph Theory","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgt.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Füredi and Gunderson showed that e x ( n , C 2 k + 1 ) is achieved only on K ⌊ n 2 ⌋ , ⌈ n 2 ⌉ if n ≥ 4 k − 2 . It is natural to study how far a C 2 k + 1 -free graph is from being bipartite. If a graph G and a graph H have at most one vertex in common and there is no edge connecting V ( G ) − V ( G ) ∩ V ( H ) and V ( H ) − V ( G ) ∩ V ( H ) , then we call graph H a suspension to graph G with ∣ V ( G ) ∩ V ( H ) ∣ suspension point. Let T * ( r , n ) be obtained by adding a suspension K r with 1 suspension point to K ⌊ n − r + 1 2 ⌋ , ⌈ n − r + 1 2 ⌉ . Let d 2 ( G ) = min { ∣ T ∣ : T ⊆ V ( G ) , G − T is bipartite } and γ 2 ( G ) = min { ∣ E ∣ : E ⊆ E ( G ) , G − E is bipartite } . Ren, Wang, Wang, and Yang showed that if G is an n -vertex C 2 k + 1 -free graph with e ( G ) ≥ ( n − r + 1 ) 2 4 + r 2 , then d 2 ( G ) ≤ r − 2 and γ 2 ( G ) ≤ ⌈ r 2 ⌉ 2 + ⌊ r 2 ⌋ 2 , and equalities hold if and only if G = T * ( r , n ) for 3 ≤ r ≤ 2 k and n ≥ 318 ( r − 2 ) 2 k . In this paper, we show that for integers r , k with 3 ≤ r ≤ 2 k − 4 and n ≥ 20 ( r + 2 ) 2 k , if G is a C 2 k + 1 -free n -vertex graph with e ( G ) ≥ e ( T * ( r , n ) ) , then G is obtained by adding suspensions to a ‘nearly balanced complete’ bipartite graph G [ V 1 , V 2 ] one by one and the number of vertices not in G [ V 1 , V 2 ] is no more than r − 1 . Furthermore, the total number of vertices not in G [ V 1 , V 2 ] equals r − 1 if and only if G = T * ( r , n ) . Roughly speaking, we give a strong structural information for C 2 k + 1 -free graph G rather than the distance from being bipartite when e x ( n , C 2 k + 1 ) − e ( G ) = O ( n k ) if k = O ( n 1 3 ) . In the proof, we introduce a new concept strong- 2 k -core which is the key that we can give a stronger structural stability result but a simpler proof.

c2k + 1自由图的强结构稳定性
fredi和Gunderson证明了ex (n)c2k + 1)只在K⌊n2上实现⌋ ,(n²N≥4 k−2。研究一个c2k + 1自由图离由两部分构成的。如果一个图G和一个图H有最多一个共同的顶点并且没有连接V的边(g)−v (g)∩v(H)和V (H)−v (g)∩v (h)),则称之为图 fredi和Gunderson证明了ex (n)c2k + 1)只在K⌊n2上实现⌋ ,(n²N≥4 k−2。研究一个c2k + 1自由图离由两部分构成的。 如果一个图G和一个图H有最多一个共同的顶点并且没有连接V的边(g)−v (g)∩v(H)和V (H)−v (g)∩v (h)) ,那么我们称图H为图G(∣V)的悬架(G)∩V (H)∣悬浮点。 设T * (r)n)加一个悬浮K r,悬浮点为1,得到K⌊n−r+ 1 2⌋,(n−r +1 . 2; 设d2 (G) = min{∣t∣:T⊥(g);G−T是二部的}γ 2 (G) =min{∣E∣:E≤(g);G−E是二部的}。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Graph Theory
Journal of Graph Theory 数学-数学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Graph Theory is devoted to a variety of topics in graph theory, such as structural results about graphs, graph algorithms with theoretical emphasis, and discrete optimization on graphs. The scope of the journal also includes related areas in combinatorics and the interaction of graph theory with other mathematical sciences. A subscription to the Journal of Graph Theory includes a subscription to the Journal of Combinatorial Designs .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书