Second-Order Between-Supplier Learning

IF 10.4 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of Operations Management Pub Date : 2026-04-02 Epub Date: 2026-01-18 DOI:10.1002/joom.70033
Lisha Liu, Xianwei Shi, Guangzhi Shang
{"title":"Second-Order Between-Supplier Learning","authors":"Lisha Liu,&nbsp;Xianwei Shi,&nbsp;Guangzhi Shang","doi":"10.1002/joom.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Substantial empirical evidence shows that suppliers in emerging economies can enhance their technological capabilities through <i>direct</i> learning from technologically advanced foreign competitors. However, suppliers in emerging markets may struggle to learn directly from knowledge about competitors’ products that are <i>not</i> widely available on the consumer market. We draw on insights from existing literature, explorative interviews, and anecdotal evidence to hypothesize that firms may resort to <i>indirect</i> learning channels by leveraging downstream customers as knowledge conduits. Using the Chinese manufacturing industry's import data from 2001 to 2015, our quantitative study reveals the innovation premium of such an indirect learning channel that we term as ‘<i>second-order between-supplier learning</i>’: suppliers’ technological capabilities improve significantly when they supply to domestic customers who have imported from their technologically more advanced foreign competitors. Through a qualitative study, we develop a theoretical framework to account for the mechanisms underlying this indirect learning channel, outlining the <i>motivations</i>, <i>contents</i>, and <i>contingencies</i> that shape the effectiveness of second-order between-supplier learning. Our findings contribute to supply chain management and organizational learning literature by building a theory of second-order between-supplier learning. Our findings could also inform suppliers in emerging markets about technological development and guide policymakers on cross-border supply chain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"72 3","pages":"386-416"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.70033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substantial empirical evidence shows that suppliers in emerging economies can enhance their technological capabilities through direct learning from technologically advanced foreign competitors. However, suppliers in emerging markets may struggle to learn directly from knowledge about competitors’ products that are not widely available on the consumer market. We draw on insights from existing literature, explorative interviews, and anecdotal evidence to hypothesize that firms may resort to indirect learning channels by leveraging downstream customers as knowledge conduits. Using the Chinese manufacturing industry's import data from 2001 to 2015, our quantitative study reveals the innovation premium of such an indirect learning channel that we term as ‘second-order between-supplier learning’: suppliers’ technological capabilities improve significantly when they supply to domestic customers who have imported from their technologically more advanced foreign competitors. Through a qualitative study, we develop a theoretical framework to account for the mechanisms underlying this indirect learning channel, outlining the motivations, contents, and contingencies that shape the effectiveness of second-order between-supplier learning. Our findings contribute to supply chain management and organizational learning literature by building a theory of second-order between-supplier learning. Our findings could also inform suppliers in emerging markets about technological development and guide policymakers on cross-border supply chain management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

二阶供应商间学习
大量经验证据表明,新兴经济体的供应商可以通过直接向技术先进的外国竞争对手学习来提高自己的技术能力。然而,新兴市场的供应商可能很难直接从消费者市场上无法广泛获得的竞争对手产品的知识中学习。我们从现有文献、探索性访谈和轶事证据中得出见解,假设企业可能通过利用下游客户作为知识管道,诉诸于间接学习渠道。利用2001 - 2015年中国制造业的进口数据,我们的定量研究揭示了这种间接学习渠道的创新溢价,我们称之为“二阶供应商间学习”:当供应商向从技术更先进的外国竞争对手那里进口产品的国内客户供货时,供应商的技术能力显著提高。通过定性研究,我们开发了一个理论框架来解释这种间接学习渠道背后的机制,概述了形成二级供应商之间学习有效性的动机、内容和偶然事件。通过建立供应商间二阶学习理论,我们的研究结果对供应链管理和组织学习文献有所贡献。我们的研究结果还可以为新兴市场的供应商提供有关技术发展的信息,并指导决策者进行跨境供应链管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement. JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough. Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification. JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书