Deep Information Retrieval Using Neural Language Models for Accounting Research: An Illustration Using Press News

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2026-04-05 Epub Date: 2025-12-12 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.70019
Yuxin Shan, Shuanglu Dai, Hanyi Zhang, Hong Man
{"title":"Deep Information Retrieval Using Neural Language Models for Accounting Research: An Illustration Using Press News","authors":"Yuxin Shan,&nbsp;Shuanglu Dai,&nbsp;Hanyi Zhang,&nbsp;Hong Man","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used to collect and analyze information from diverse sources, such as earning calls, news press releases, and social media. This has empowered accounting researchers to generate valuable insights in support of financial accounting, auditing, and corporate governance research. Compared to intensive manual reviews, ML models can automatically process millions of documents in days and generate statistical analyses. To incorporate text nuances into consideration, this paper demonstrates the application of large language models (LLMs) or fine-tuning a language model in extracting accounting-related information, using public web news announcements as an example of potential information sources. The proposed method is then evaluated using the latest well-known LLM services including ChatGPT, Llama and Sonnet, as well as the traditional probabilistic model. Additionally, this study discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different LLM models from the perspective of mismatches. As the standard ML benchmarking approach—human ground truth labeling through millions of pages—is time-consuming and expensive, it limits researchers' ability to acquire relevant information. Therefore, we compare mismatches in this study as an effective alternative approach to evaluate LLMs performances. This study contributes to the accounting literature by comparing the pros and cons of different LLMs in the context of extracting relevant information for accounting research. Moreover, it highlights the advantages of LLMs in understanding text nuances compared to traditional methods that rely on keywords and word frequency, helping accounting researchers select the appropriate language models for their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":"37 2","pages":"162-183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.70019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used to collect and analyze information from diverse sources, such as earning calls, news press releases, and social media. This has empowered accounting researchers to generate valuable insights in support of financial accounting, auditing, and corporate governance research. Compared to intensive manual reviews, ML models can automatically process millions of documents in days and generate statistical analyses. To incorporate text nuances into consideration, this paper demonstrates the application of large language models (LLMs) or fine-tuning a language model in extracting accounting-related information, using public web news announcements as an example of potential information sources. The proposed method is then evaluated using the latest well-known LLM services including ChatGPT, Llama and Sonnet, as well as the traditional probabilistic model. Additionally, this study discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different LLM models from the perspective of mismatches. As the standard ML benchmarking approach—human ground truth labeling through millions of pages—is time-consuming and expensive, it limits researchers' ability to acquire relevant information. Therefore, we compare mismatches in this study as an effective alternative approach to evaluate LLMs performances. This study contributes to the accounting literature by comparing the pros and cons of different LLMs in the context of extracting relevant information for accounting research. Moreover, it highlights the advantages of LLMs in understanding text nuances compared to traditional methods that rely on keywords and word frequency, helping accounting researchers select the appropriate language models for their work.

利用神经语言模型进行会计研究的深度信息检索:以新闻为例
近年来,机器学习(ML)模型越来越多地用于收集和分析来自不同来源的信息,例如盈利电话、新闻新闻稿和社交媒体。这使会计研究人员能够产生有价值的见解,以支持财务会计、审计和公司治理研究。与密集的人工审查相比,ML模型可以在几天内自动处理数百万个文档并生成统计分析。为了考虑文本的细微差别,本文展示了在提取会计相关信息时使用大型语言模型(llm)或微调语言模型的应用,并以公共网络新闻公告作为潜在信息源的示例。然后使用最新知名的LLM服务(包括ChatGPT, Llama和Sonnet)以及传统的概率模型对所提出的方法进行评估。此外,本研究还从错配的角度讨论了不同LLM模型的优缺点。由于标准的机器学习基准测试方法——通过数百万页进行人类地面真相标记——既耗时又昂贵,它限制了研究人员获取相关信息的能力。因此,我们在本研究中比较错配作为评估llm性能的有效替代方法。本研究通过比较不同llm在提取会计研究相关信息的背景下的利弊,为会计文献做出贡献。此外,与依赖关键词和词频的传统方法相比,它强调了法学硕士在理解文本细微差别方面的优势,帮助会计研究人员为他们的工作选择合适的语言模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书