Palliative Care in Rheumatology: Perspectives of Rheumatologists and Palliative Care Clinicians Across the United States.

Shannon Herndon,Maya N Faison,Jack Kimball,Amanda M Eudy,Ankoor Shah,Jennifer Rogers,Christopher A Jones,David Leverenz
{"title":"Palliative Care in Rheumatology: Perspectives of Rheumatologists and Palliative Care Clinicians Across the United States.","authors":"Shannon Herndon,Maya N Faison,Jack Kimball,Amanda M Eudy,Ankoor Shah,Jennifer Rogers,Christopher A Jones,David Leverenz","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nExplore perspectives of rheumatologists and palliative care clinicians on the role of palliative care in rheumatic disease.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe developed two questionnaires, one for rheumatologists and a second for palliative care clinicians, exploring education about the opposite specialty, frequency of Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions and referrals, and clinician comfort with palliative care skills in rheumatic disease. Questionnaires were distributed to clinicians across the United States in a variety of clinical practice settings.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n201 rheumatologists and 217 palliative care clinicians completed the questionnaires. Few clinicians had received more than a lecture about the opposite specialty. Most rheumatologists reported never or rarely discussing ACP (71.6%), many had not referred a patient to palliative care in the last year in the outpatient (67.2%) or inpatient (47.5%) setting, and they reported low comfort with many palliative care skills. However, the majority agreed that more of their patients could benefit from palliative care (66.2%). Most palliative care clinicians felt less comfortable providing care for rheumatology patients compared to other patients in their practice (75.6%), but the majority felt they could be helpful across many common referral indications for people with rheumatic disease. Clinicians with more advanced education in the opposite specialty reported higher comfort across palliative care skills.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThere is a clear gap in cross-disciplinary education and collaboration between rheumatologists and palliative care clinicians with low rates of referral and low rates of clinician-comfort. Nonetheless, clinicians feel collaboration would be beneficial. Further partnership is needed to improve this gap.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"441 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Explore perspectives of rheumatologists and palliative care clinicians on the role of palliative care in rheumatic disease. METHODS We developed two questionnaires, one for rheumatologists and a second for palliative care clinicians, exploring education about the opposite specialty, frequency of Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions and referrals, and clinician comfort with palliative care skills in rheumatic disease. Questionnaires were distributed to clinicians across the United States in a variety of clinical practice settings. RESULTS 201 rheumatologists and 217 palliative care clinicians completed the questionnaires. Few clinicians had received more than a lecture about the opposite specialty. Most rheumatologists reported never or rarely discussing ACP (71.6%), many had not referred a patient to palliative care in the last year in the outpatient (67.2%) or inpatient (47.5%) setting, and they reported low comfort with many palliative care skills. However, the majority agreed that more of their patients could benefit from palliative care (66.2%). Most palliative care clinicians felt less comfortable providing care for rheumatology patients compared to other patients in their practice (75.6%), but the majority felt they could be helpful across many common referral indications for people with rheumatic disease. Clinicians with more advanced education in the opposite specialty reported higher comfort across palliative care skills. CONCLUSION There is a clear gap in cross-disciplinary education and collaboration between rheumatologists and palliative care clinicians with low rates of referral and low rates of clinician-comfort. Nonetheless, clinicians feel collaboration would be beneficial. Further partnership is needed to improve this gap.
风湿病的姑息治疗:美国风湿病学家和姑息治疗临床医生的观点。
目的探讨风湿病学家和姑息治疗临床医生对姑息治疗在风湿病中的作用的看法。方法我们编制了两份调查问卷,一份针对风湿病学家,另一份针对姑息治疗临床医生,探讨对相反专科的教育、预先护理计划(ACP)讨论和转诊的频率,以及临床医生对风湿病姑息治疗技能的满意度。调查问卷被分发给美国各地不同临床实践环境的临床医生。结果共有201名风湿病专家和217名姑息治疗临床医生完成问卷调查。很少有临床医生接受过有关相反专业的讲座。大多数风湿病学家报告从未或很少讨论ACP(71.6%),许多人在去年的门诊(67.2%)或住院(47.5%)环境中没有将患者转介到姑息治疗,他们报告对许多姑息治疗技巧不太满意。然而,大多数人认为更多的病人可以从姑息治疗中受益(66.2%)。与其他患者相比,大多数姑息治疗临床医生(75.6%)认为为风湿病患者提供护理不太舒服,但大多数人认为他们可以帮助风湿病患者解决许多常见的转诊适应症。在相反专业接受更高级教育的临床医生报告说,他们对姑息治疗技能的满意度更高。结论风湿病学家与姑息治疗临床医生之间的跨学科教育和合作存在明显差距,转诊率低,临床舒适度低。尽管如此,临床医生认为合作是有益的。需要进一步的伙伴关系来改善这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书