A Narrative Review of Diagnostic Strategies in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: From Clinical Scores to Multi-Omics and Machine Learning

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Xiaolin Ji, Xinze Li, Zhongqiu Lu
{"title":"A Narrative Review of Diagnostic Strategies in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: From Clinical Scores to Multi-Omics and Machine Learning","authors":"Xiaolin Ji, Xinze Li, Zhongqiu Lu","doi":"10.1093/burnst/tkag028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent a group of rapidly progressing, life-threatening infections characterized by widespread tissue necrosis, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan failure. Early diagnosis remains a clinical challenge because of nonspecific initial manifestations and overlapping symptoms with other soft tissue infections. Diagnostic scoring systems such as the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score and its variants have been widely utilized to facilitate early recognition but are limited by variable sensitivity and insufficient predictive value across diverse clinical populations. Recent advances in multi-omics technologies and machine learning approaches have enabled the identification of molecular biomarkers and predictive patterns associated with NSTI onset and progression. Integration of high-dimensional omics data with clinical and imaging parameters holds potential for dynamic, real-time diagnostic support and individualized risk stratification in the intensive care setting. This review summarizes the evolution of diagnostic strategies for NSTIs, critically appraises the limitations of conventional clinical scoring systems, and examines emerging omics-based and machine learning-driven approaches. Finally, we propose an integrated diagnostic roadmap that aligns clinical assessment, imaging, microbiologic evaluation, host-response biomarkers, and multi-omics data to guide future research and clinical translation.","PeriodicalId":9553,"journal":{"name":"Burns & Trauma","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkag028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent a group of rapidly progressing, life-threatening infections characterized by widespread tissue necrosis, systemic inflammation, and multiorgan failure. Early diagnosis remains a clinical challenge because of nonspecific initial manifestations and overlapping symptoms with other soft tissue infections. Diagnostic scoring systems such as the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score and its variants have been widely utilized to facilitate early recognition but are limited by variable sensitivity and insufficient predictive value across diverse clinical populations. Recent advances in multi-omics technologies and machine learning approaches have enabled the identification of molecular biomarkers and predictive patterns associated with NSTI onset and progression. Integration of high-dimensional omics data with clinical and imaging parameters holds potential for dynamic, real-time diagnostic support and individualized risk stratification in the intensive care setting. This review summarizes the evolution of diagnostic strategies for NSTIs, critically appraises the limitations of conventional clinical scoring systems, and examines emerging omics-based and machine learning-driven approaches. Finally, we propose an integrated diagnostic roadmap that aligns clinical assessment, imaging, microbiologic evaluation, host-response biomarkers, and multi-omics data to guide future research and clinical translation.
坏死性软组织感染诊断策略的述评:从临床评分到多组学和机器学习
坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)是一组进展迅速、危及生命的感染,其特征是广泛的组织坏死、全身炎症和多器官功能衰竭。早期诊断仍然是一个临床挑战,因为非特异性的初始表现和重叠的症状与其他软组织感染。诊断评分系统,如坏死性筋膜炎实验室风险指标(LRINEC)评分及其变体,已广泛用于促进早期识别,但受不同临床人群的敏感性和预测价值不足的限制。多组学技术和机器学习方法的最新进展已经能够识别与NSTI发病和进展相关的分子生物标志物和预测模式。将高维组学数据与临床和影像学参数相结合,在重症监护环境中具有动态、实时诊断支持和个性化风险分层的潜力。本文总结了NSTIs诊断策略的发展,批判性地评估了传统临床评分系统的局限性,并研究了新兴的基于组学和机器学习驱动的方法。最后,我们提出了一个整合临床评估、影像学、微生物学评估、宿主反应生物标志物和多组学数据的综合诊断路线图,以指导未来的研究和临床翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Burns & Trauma
Burns & Trauma 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The first open access journal in the field of burns and trauma injury in the Asia-Pacific region, Burns & Trauma publishes the latest developments in basic, clinical and translational research in the field. With a special focus on prevention, clinical treatment and basic research, the journal welcomes submissions in various aspects of biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, critical care, immunobiology, skin transplantation, and the prevention and regeneration of burns and trauma injuries. With an expert Editorial Board and a team of dedicated scientific editors, the journal enjoys a large readership and is supported by Southwest Hospital, which covers authors'' article processing charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书