Identification of Novel Sources of Ascochyta Blight Resistance in Wild Relatives of Chickpea

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Kanwardeep S. Rawale, Kurtis Schroeder, Kevin McPhee, Yung C. Chen, Weidong Chen, Kulvinder S. Gill
{"title":"Identification of Novel Sources of Ascochyta Blight Resistance in Wild Relatives of Chickpea","authors":"Kanwardeep S. Rawale,&nbsp;Kurtis Schroeder,&nbsp;Kevin McPhee,&nbsp;Yung C. Chen,&nbsp;Weidong Chen,&nbsp;Kulvinder S. Gill","doi":"10.1111/jph.70292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ascochyta blight, caused by <i>Ascochyta rabiei</i>, is the most devastating disease affecting global chickpea production and is currently managed with partially resistant varieties and multiple fungicide applications in years of the epidemic. However, the identification of new pathotypes that are resistant to commonly used fungicides and increased aggressiveness against the current germplasm puts the sustainability of chickpea production under constant threat. Thus, identifying novel sources of genetic resistance against highly aggressive <i>Ascochyta rabiei</i> pathotypes followed by transfer to chickpea varieties is the first step in effective disease management. In this study, 90 chickpea accessions representing eight <i>Cicer</i> species were evaluated for ascochyta blight resistance using a reliable controlled conditions screening method against an <i>A. rabiei</i> pathotype prevalent in the Pacific Northwest, USA. The mean disease score across accessions ranged from 1.25 to 9 on a 1–9 rating scale, with 1 being the most resistant. Out of the eight <i>Cicer</i> species, the highest level of disease resistance was identified in <i>C. bijugum</i> and <i>C. echinospermum</i> germplasm, with the lowest disease scores of 1.25 and 2.82, respectively. Additional germplasm characterization based on the mean disease and disease spread across biological replicates revealed six novel accessions with a high level of genetic resistance, with a mean disease score between 1.25 and 1.8.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"174 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ascochyta blight, caused by Ascochyta rabiei, is the most devastating disease affecting global chickpea production and is currently managed with partially resistant varieties and multiple fungicide applications in years of the epidemic. However, the identification of new pathotypes that are resistant to commonly used fungicides and increased aggressiveness against the current germplasm puts the sustainability of chickpea production under constant threat. Thus, identifying novel sources of genetic resistance against highly aggressive Ascochyta rabiei pathotypes followed by transfer to chickpea varieties is the first step in effective disease management. In this study, 90 chickpea accessions representing eight Cicer species were evaluated for ascochyta blight resistance using a reliable controlled conditions screening method against an A. rabiei pathotype prevalent in the Pacific Northwest, USA. The mean disease score across accessions ranged from 1.25 to 9 on a 1–9 rating scale, with 1 being the most resistant. Out of the eight Cicer species, the highest level of disease resistance was identified in C. bijugum and C. echinospermum germplasm, with the lowest disease scores of 1.25 and 2.82, respectively. Additional germplasm characterization based on the mean disease and disease spread across biological replicates revealed six novel accessions with a high level of genetic resistance, with a mean disease score between 1.25 and 1.8.

鹰嘴豆野生近缘种抗疫病新来源的鉴定
鹰嘴豆疫病是由鹰嘴豆病引起的,是影响全球鹰嘴豆生产的最具破坏性的疾病,目前通过部分抗性品种和在流行年份使用多种杀菌剂进行管理。然而,对常用杀菌剂具有抗性的新病型的发现和对现有种质的侵袭性增强,使鹰嘴豆生产的可持续性不断受到威胁。因此,鉴定抗高侵袭性鼠眼病的新遗传抗性来源,然后将其转移到鹰嘴豆品种是有效的疾病管理的第一步。本研究采用可靠的对照条件筛选方法,对美国太平洋西北地区流行的一种拉氏伊蚊病原菌进行了90份鹰嘴豆材料8种品种的抗叶枯病性评价。在1 - 9等级量表上,各品种的平均疾病得分从1.25到9不等,其中1为最抗性。在8种蝉属植物中,比桔和棘皮蝉属的抗病指数最高,分别为1.25和2.82。基于平均疾病和跨生物重复的疾病传播的其他种质特征显示,6个具有高水平遗传抗性的新材料,平均疾病评分在1.25至1.8之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书