Expediting Standard-Setting for Sustainability Assurance in the Public Interest

IF 1.4 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
International Journal of Auditing Pub Date : 2026-04-06 Epub Date: 2026-01-28 DOI:10.1111/ijau.70022
Chrystelle Richard, Claire Grayston, Tom Seidenstein
{"title":"Expediting Standard-Setting for Sustainability Assurance in the Public Interest","authors":"Chrystelle Richard,&nbsp;Claire Grayston,&nbsp;Tom Seidenstein","doi":"10.1111/ijau.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The global transition from voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting has heightened the demand for credible, comparable and decision-useful sustainability information. In this context, assurance plays a crucial role in reinforcing trust and accountability. Responding to widespread regulatory and market expectations, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) developed International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA) 5000, <i>General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements</i>, the first comprehensive, profession-agnostic international standard dedicated to sustainability assurance. In this Perspectives article invited by the Editor-in Chief, we analyse the rationale, development process and implications of ISSA 5000 within the broader evolution of sustainability reporting and assurance. It examines how the IAASB, in coordination with the International Standards Board of Accountants (IESBA), expedited the standard-setting process to deliver a globally applicable framework aligned with the public interest. Drawing on extensive stakeholder consultation, the article explores how ISSA 5000 addresses fundamental challenges (materiality, ethical requirements, assurance levels and the use of experts) while balancing conceptual robustness with practical applicability. The study further investigates the emerging challenges of adoption and implementation across jurisdictions, particularly in relation to the European Union's (EU) Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and parallel developments in other regulatory regimes. By formalizing a unified assurance framework, ISSA 5000 marks a pivotal step in institutionalizing sustainability assurance as a distinct professional field. The article concludes by outlining future research opportunities on assurance quality, cross-jurisdictional convergence, practitioner adaptation and the evolving role of technology in shaping assurance practice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"30 2","pages":"181-191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijau.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global transition from voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting has heightened the demand for credible, comparable and decision-useful sustainability information. In this context, assurance plays a crucial role in reinforcing trust and accountability. Responding to widespread regulatory and market expectations, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) developed International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA) 5000, General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements, the first comprehensive, profession-agnostic international standard dedicated to sustainability assurance. In this Perspectives article invited by the Editor-in Chief, we analyse the rationale, development process and implications of ISSA 5000 within the broader evolution of sustainability reporting and assurance. It examines how the IAASB, in coordination with the International Standards Board of Accountants (IESBA), expedited the standard-setting process to deliver a globally applicable framework aligned with the public interest. Drawing on extensive stakeholder consultation, the article explores how ISSA 5000 addresses fundamental challenges (materiality, ethical requirements, assurance levels and the use of experts) while balancing conceptual robustness with practical applicability. The study further investigates the emerging challenges of adoption and implementation across jurisdictions, particularly in relation to the European Union's (EU) Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and parallel developments in other regulatory regimes. By formalizing a unified assurance framework, ISSA 5000 marks a pivotal step in institutionalizing sustainability assurance as a distinct professional field. The article concludes by outlining future research opportunities on assurance quality, cross-jurisdictional convergence, practitioner adaptation and the evolving role of technology in shaping assurance practice.

加快制定符合公众利益的可持续发展保证标准
全球从自愿向强制性可持续发展报告过渡,提高了对可信、可比和决策有用的可持续发展信息的需求。在这方面,保证在加强信任和问责制方面起着至关重要的作用。为响应广泛的监管和市场期望,国际审计与鉴证准则理事会(IAASB)制定了《国际可持续鉴证准则(ISSA) 5000——可持续鉴证业务的一般要求》,这是第一个致力于可持续鉴证的综合性、与专业无关的国际准则。在这篇由主编邀请的展望文章中,我们分析了ISSA 5000在可持续发展报告和鉴证的更广泛发展中的基本原理、发展过程和影响。报告探讨了国际会计准则理事会(iasb)如何与国际会计师准则理事会(IESBA)协调,加快准则制定进程,以提供符合公众利益的全球适用框架。在广泛征求利益相关方意见的基础上,本文探讨了ISSA 5000如何在平衡概念稳健性与实际适用性的同时应对基本挑战(重要性、道德要求、鉴证水平和专家的使用)。该研究进一步调查了跨司法管辖区采用和实施新出现的挑战,特别是与欧盟(EU)企业可持续发展报告指令(CSRD)和其他监管制度的平行发展有关。通过正式确定统一的保证框架,ISSA 5000标志着可持续保证作为一个独特的专业领域制度化的关键一步。文章最后概述了未来在保证质量、跨司法管辖区融合、从业者适应和技术在塑造保证实践中不断发展的作用方面的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: In addition to communicating the results of original auditing research, the International Journal of Auditing also aims to advance knowledge in auditing by publishing critiques, thought leadership papers and literature reviews on specific aspects of auditing. The journal seeks to publish articles that have international appeal either due to the topic transcending national frontiers or due to the clear potential for readers to apply the results or ideas in their local environments. While articles must be methodologically and theoretically sound, any research orientation is acceptable. This means that papers may have an analytical and statistical, behavioural, economic and financial (including agency), sociological, critical, or historical basis. The editors consider articles for publication which fit into one or more of the following subject categories: • Financial statement audits • Public sector/governmental auditing • Internal auditing • Audit education and methods of teaching auditing (including case studies) • Audit aspects of corporate governance, including audit committees • Audit quality • Audit fees and related issues • Environmental, social and sustainability audits • Audit related ethical issues • Audit regulation • Independence issues • Legal liability and other legal issues • Auditing history • New and emerging audit and assurance issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书