More ESG Practices, Higher Financial Performance? The U-Shaped Pattern in China's Agricultural and Food Firms

IF 2.4 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Agribusiness Pub Date : 2026-04-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1002/agr.21989
Yanyan Zhang, Tao Xiong
{"title":"More ESG Practices, Higher Financial Performance? The U-Shaped Pattern in China's Agricultural and Food Firms","authors":"Yanyan Zhang,&nbsp;Tao Xiong","doi":"10.1002/agr.21989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>ESG (environmental, social, and governance) practices, an internationally recognized concept of a firm's sustainability, can serve as a bridge to enhance effective communication between firms and various stakeholders. It is also a new tool for measuring firms' value. This study employs a balanced panel data set of 114 publicly traded agricultural and food firms in China from 2016 to 2022. It empirically investigates the relationship between ESG and financial performance based on shareholder primacy theory and stakeholder theory. Employing a two-way fixed effects (FE) model, our findings reveal a U-shaped nonlinear pattern in how ESG impacts financial performance. It differs from previous studies that found predominantly positive relationships: Specifically, the average ESG score for firms is 0.396, the median is 0.390, and the inflection point of the U-shape occurs at 0.53. When firms' ESG investments are less than 0.53, the high initial ESG cost makes it difficult to transform ESG into financial improvement. However, once this threshold is surpassed, good ESG can convey an excellent reputation to the public and increase anti-risk ability—which, in turn, significantly improves firms' financial performance and facilitates long-term development. Also, our study demonstrates that firms' ownership and different positions in the supply chain differentially affect the relationship between ESG and financial performance. This paper also offers insights into promoting the sustainable development of Chinese agri-food firms.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55544,"journal":{"name":"Agribusiness","volume":"42 2","pages":"641-652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agribusiness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agr.21989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ESG (environmental, social, and governance) practices, an internationally recognized concept of a firm's sustainability, can serve as a bridge to enhance effective communication between firms and various stakeholders. It is also a new tool for measuring firms' value. This study employs a balanced panel data set of 114 publicly traded agricultural and food firms in China from 2016 to 2022. It empirically investigates the relationship between ESG and financial performance based on shareholder primacy theory and stakeholder theory. Employing a two-way fixed effects (FE) model, our findings reveal a U-shaped nonlinear pattern in how ESG impacts financial performance. It differs from previous studies that found predominantly positive relationships: Specifically, the average ESG score for firms is 0.396, the median is 0.390, and the inflection point of the U-shape occurs at 0.53. When firms' ESG investments are less than 0.53, the high initial ESG cost makes it difficult to transform ESG into financial improvement. However, once this threshold is surpassed, good ESG can convey an excellent reputation to the public and increase anti-risk ability—which, in turn, significantly improves firms' financial performance and facilitates long-term development. Also, our study demonstrates that firms' ownership and different positions in the supply chain differentially affect the relationship between ESG and financial performance. This paper also offers insights into promoting the sustainable development of Chinese agri-food firms.

更多的ESG实践,更高的财务绩效?中国农业和食品企业的u型结构
ESG(环境、社会和治理)实践是国际公认的企业可持续性概念,可以作为加强企业与各利益相关者之间有效沟通的桥梁。它也是衡量公司价值的新工具。本研究采用了2016年至2022年中国114家上市农业和食品公司的平衡面板数据集。基于股东至上理论和利益相关者理论,实证研究了ESG与财务绩效的关系。采用双向固定效应(FE)模型,我们的研究结果揭示了ESG如何影响财务绩效的u形非线性模式。它与以往的研究发现的主要是正相关关系不同:具体而言,公司的ESG平均得分为0.396,中位数为0.390,u形拐点出现在0.53。当企业ESG投资小于0.53时,初始ESG成本较高,难以将ESG转化为财务改善。然而,一旦超过这个门槛,良好的ESG就可以向公众传达良好的声誉,增强抗风险能力,从而显著提高企业的财务绩效,促进企业的长期发展。此外,我们的研究还表明,企业的所有权和供应链中的不同位置对ESG与财务绩效之间的关系有不同的影响。本文还为促进我国农业食品企业的可持续发展提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agribusiness
Agribusiness 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Agribusiness: An International Journal publishes research that improves our understanding of how food systems work, how they are evolving, and how public and/or private actions affect the performance of the global agro-industrial complex. The journal focuses on the application of economic analysis to the organization and performance of firms and markets in industrial food systems. Subject matter areas include supply and demand analysis, industrial organization analysis, price and trade analysis, marketing, finance, and public policy analysis. International, cross-country comparative, and within-country studies are welcome. To facilitate research the journal’s Forum section, on an intermittent basis, offers commentary and reports on business policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书