Quality disclosure in agricultural supply chains: farmer versus platform disclosure

IF 3.5 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Yong Tan, Ziwei Zhou, Xu Guan, Yuan Jiang
{"title":"Quality disclosure in agricultural supply chains: farmer versus platform disclosure","authors":"Yong Tan,&nbsp;Ziwei Zhou,&nbsp;Xu Guan,&nbsp;Yuan Jiang","doi":"10.1111/itor.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the firms' equilibrium disclosure strategies in an agricultural supply chain, wherein the farmer sells agricultural products through an intermediary platform to the end market. Both the farmer and the platform privately observe the product quality information and independently determine whether to disclose this information to the consumers. We examine two disclosure formats, farmer disclosure format and platform disclosure format, depending on who is responsible for quality disclosure. Our analysis reveals that the commission rate exerts a nontrivial impact on the farmer's and platform's disclosure incentive and their profits. The farmer has the incentive to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is low, while the platform chooses to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is high. Additionally, under farmer (platform) disclosure format, the platform's (farmer's) profit exhibits nonmonotonic pattern with respect to the commission rate when the disclosure cost is low. Moreover, we show that both the farmer and the platform may opt to take the disclosure responsibility by itself, and in certain conditions, their preferences for two disclosure formats could be aligned, resulting in a “win-win” situation for both parties.</p>","PeriodicalId":49176,"journal":{"name":"International Transactions in Operational Research","volume":"33 5","pages":"2870-2892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Transactions in Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/itor.70008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the firms' equilibrium disclosure strategies in an agricultural supply chain, wherein the farmer sells agricultural products through an intermediary platform to the end market. Both the farmer and the platform privately observe the product quality information and independently determine whether to disclose this information to the consumers. We examine two disclosure formats, farmer disclosure format and platform disclosure format, depending on who is responsible for quality disclosure. Our analysis reveals that the commission rate exerts a nontrivial impact on the farmer's and platform's disclosure incentive and their profits. The farmer has the incentive to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is low, while the platform chooses to disclose the quality information only when the commission rate is high. Additionally, under farmer (platform) disclosure format, the platform's (farmer's) profit exhibits nonmonotonic pattern with respect to the commission rate when the disclosure cost is low. Moreover, we show that both the farmer and the platform may opt to take the disclosure responsibility by itself, and in certain conditions, their preferences for two disclosure formats could be aligned, resulting in a “win-win” situation for both parties.

农业供应链中的质量信息披露:农民与平台信息披露
本文研究了农民通过中间平台向终端市场销售农产品的农业供应链中企业的均衡披露策略。农民和平台都私下观察产品质量信息,并自主决定是否向消费者披露这些信息。我们考察了两种披露格式,即农民披露格式和平台披露格式,这取决于谁对质量披露负责。我们的分析表明,佣金率对农民和平台的信息披露激励及其利润产生了不小的影响。农民只有在佣金率较低的情况下才有披露质量信息的动机,而平台只有在佣金率较高的情况下才会选择披露质量信息。此外,在农民(平台)披露模式下,当披露成本较低时,平台(农民)利润与佣金率呈非单调关系。此外,我们表明,农民和平台都可能选择自行承担披露责任,并且在一定条件下,他们对两种披露形式的偏好可以一致,从而实现双方的“双赢”局面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Transactions in Operational Research
International Transactions in Operational Research OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Transactions in Operational Research (ITOR) aims to advance the understanding and practice of Operational Research (OR) and Management Science internationally. Its scope includes: International problems, such as those of fisheries management, environmental issues, and global competitiveness International work done by major OR figures Studies of worldwide interest from nations with emerging OR communities National or regional OR work which has the potential for application in other nations Technical developments of international interest Specific organizational examples that can be applied in other countries National and international presentations of transnational interest Broadly relevant professional issues, such as those of ethics and practice Applications relevant to global industries, such as operations management, manufacturing, and logistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书