Club Activity, Study Groups, and Academic Achievement: A Nationwide Study of Japanese Medical Students' Extracurricular Life

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hirohisa Fujikawa, Hidetaka Tamune, Yuji Nishizaki, Hirotake Mori, Sho Fukui, Kiyoshi Shikino, Taro Shimizu, Yu Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Toshio Naito, Yasuharu Tokuda
{"title":"Club Activity, Study Groups, and Academic Achievement: A Nationwide Study of Japanese Medical Students' Extracurricular Life","authors":"Hirohisa Fujikawa,&nbsp;Hidetaka Tamune,&nbsp;Yuji Nishizaki,&nbsp;Hirotake Mori,&nbsp;Sho Fukui,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Shikino,&nbsp;Taro Shimizu,&nbsp;Yu Yamamoto,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kobayashi,&nbsp;Toshio Naito,&nbsp;Yasuharu Tokuda","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Student involvement in extracurricular activities (ECAs) possesses multiple benefits and has attracted substantial interest in medical education. Most studies on ECAs have been conducted in Western contexts, and findings on the association between ECAs and academic achievement are mixed. We examined the current status of ECA, particularly club activities and study groups, the most representative ECAs in Japan, among medical trainees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a nationwide cross-sectional study from April to May 2025 in Japan, using an online anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Potential participants were takers of the General Medicine In-Training Examination postgraduate “Year-0” (GM-ITE PGY-0). We asked the participants about their participation in club activities and study groups during their medical school life and evaluated their medical knowledge using their GM-ITE PGY-0 test score. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression analysis with adjustment for possible confounders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 437 of 748 medical trainees. 398 (91.1%) were involved in club activities, predominantly those involving music, while 156 (35.7%) participated in study groups, with clinical reasoning emerging as the most popular. On multivariable linear regression analysis, weekly or more frequent participation in club activities was associated with lower medical knowledge compared with no participation. In contrast, study group participation was positively and dose-dependently associated with medical knowledge test score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Medical schools should consider strategies to encourage academic ECAs such as study groups while promoting balanced engagement with nonacademic ECAs to optimize both their potential benefits and learning outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.70118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgf2.70118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Student involvement in extracurricular activities (ECAs) possesses multiple benefits and has attracted substantial interest in medical education. Most studies on ECAs have been conducted in Western contexts, and findings on the association between ECAs and academic achievement are mixed. We examined the current status of ECA, particularly club activities and study groups, the most representative ECAs in Japan, among medical trainees.

Methods

This was a nationwide cross-sectional study from April to May 2025 in Japan, using an online anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Potential participants were takers of the General Medicine In-Training Examination postgraduate “Year-0” (GM-ITE PGY-0). We asked the participants about their participation in club activities and study groups during their medical school life and evaluated their medical knowledge using their GM-ITE PGY-0 test score. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression analysis with adjustment for possible confounders.

Results

We enrolled 437 of 748 medical trainees. 398 (91.1%) were involved in club activities, predominantly those involving music, while 156 (35.7%) participated in study groups, with clinical reasoning emerging as the most popular. On multivariable linear regression analysis, weekly or more frequent participation in club activities was associated with lower medical knowledge compared with no participation. In contrast, study group participation was positively and dose-dependently associated with medical knowledge test score.

Conclusions

Medical schools should consider strategies to encourage academic ECAs such as study groups while promoting balanced engagement with nonacademic ECAs to optimize both their potential benefits and learning outcomes.

社团活动、学习小组与学业成绩:日本医科学生课外生活的全国性调查
学生参与课外活动(ECAs)具有多种好处,并引起了医学教育的极大兴趣。大多数关于eca的研究都是在西方背景下进行的,关于eca与学术成就之间关系的研究结果好坏参半。我们审查了非洲经委会的现状,特别是俱乐部活动和学习小组,这是日本医疗培训生中最具代表性的非洲经委会。方法:这是一项全国性的横断面研究,于2025年4月至5月在日本进行,采用在线匿名自我管理问卷。潜在参与者为全科医学在职考试研究生“Year-0”(GM-ITE PGY-0)的考生。我们询问了参与者在医学院生活期间参加俱乐部活动和学习小组的情况,并使用他们的GM-ITE PGY-0测试分数评估他们的医学知识。对数据进行描述性统计和多变量线性回归分析,并对可能的混杂因素进行调整。结果从748名医学实习生中筛选出437名。398人(91.1%)参加了俱乐部活动,主要是与音乐有关的活动,156人(35.7%)参加了学习小组,其中临床推理是最受欢迎的。在多变量线性回归分析中,每周或更频繁地参加俱乐部活动与不参加相比,医学知识水平较低。实验组参与程度与医学知识测验成绩呈剂量依赖性正相关。结论:医学院应考虑鼓励学术eca(如学习小组)的策略,同时促进与非学术eca的平衡参与,以优化其潜在利益和学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General and Family Medicine
Journal of General and Family Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
79
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书