Analysing the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement Effect on China's Environmental Sustainability Using Synthetic Control Method (SCM)

IF 2 4区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Journal of International Development Pub Date : 2026-04-07 Epub Date: 2026-03-12 DOI:10.1002/jid.70076
Obaid Ullah, Ali Zeb, Aijun Guo
{"title":"Analysing the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement Effect on China's Environmental Sustainability Using Synthetic Control Method (SCM)","authors":"Obaid Ullah,&nbsp;Ali Zeb,&nbsp;Aijun Guo","doi":"10.1002/jid.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study evaluates the environmental impact of the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) by modelling two major policy interventions: the 2002 signing phase, representing the initial liberalization commitments, and the 2010 implementation phase, marking the full elimination of tariffs and operationalization of the agreement. For Synthetic Control Model (SCM), a synthetic control unit needs to be constructed for comparison. The current study creates synthetic China from the weight shared by different predictor variables and the control units in the donor pool. Then, both synthetic China and China were compared after the intervention to determine the effectiveness of ACFTA. This paper offers a comprehensive evaluation of ACFTA effects on China's environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and carbon emissions as proxies for environmental sustainability. The study's outcome indicates that the ACFTA significantly enhanced carbon emissions and ecological footprint after both interventions, highlighting the inclusion of strict environmental regulation into the trade agreements. Further, it suggests policy intervention and international collaboration to eradicate the negative environmental impact of free trade agreements.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Development","volume":"38 3","pages":"589-602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.70076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental impact of the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) by modelling two major policy interventions: the 2002 signing phase, representing the initial liberalization commitments, and the 2010 implementation phase, marking the full elimination of tariffs and operationalization of the agreement. For Synthetic Control Model (SCM), a synthetic control unit needs to be constructed for comparison. The current study creates synthetic China from the weight shared by different predictor variables and the control units in the donor pool. Then, both synthetic China and China were compared after the intervention to determine the effectiveness of ACFTA. This paper offers a comprehensive evaluation of ACFTA effects on China's environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and carbon emissions as proxies for environmental sustainability. The study's outcome indicates that the ACFTA significantly enhanced carbon emissions and ecological footprint after both interventions, highlighting the inclusion of strict environmental regulation into the trade agreements. Further, it suggests policy intervention and international collaboration to eradicate the negative environmental impact of free trade agreements.

中国—东盟自由贸易协定对中国环境可持续性影响的综合控制分析
本研究通过模拟两个主要的政策干预来评估中国—东盟自由贸易协定(ACFTA)的环境影响:2002年的签署阶段,代表了最初的自由化承诺,以及2010年的实施阶段,标志着协议的全面取消关税和运作。对于综合控制模型(SCM),需要构造一个综合控制单元进行比较。目前的研究从不同的预测变量和供体池中的控制单位所共享的权重中创建了一个综合的中国。然后,比较干预后的合成中国和中国,以确定ACFTA的有效性。本文以生态足迹和碳排放作为环境可持续性指标,对ACFTA对中国环境可持续性的影响进行了综合评价。研究结果表明,两种干预措施都显著增加了中国自贸协定的碳排放和生态足迹,突出了在贸易协定中纳入了严格的环境监管。此外,它建议政策干预和国际合作以消除自由贸易协定对环境的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to publish the best research on international development issues in a form that is accessible to practitioners and policy-makers as well as to an academic audience. The main focus is on the social sciences - economics, politics, international relations, sociology and anthropology, as well as development studies - but we also welcome articles that blend the natural and social sciences in addressing the challenges for development. The Journal does not represent any particular school, analytical technique or methodological approach, but aims to publish high quality contributions to ideas, frameworks, policy and practice, including in transitional countries and underdeveloped areas of the Global North as well as the Global South.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书