{"title":"Analysing the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement Effect on China's Environmental Sustainability Using Synthetic Control Method (SCM)","authors":"Obaid Ullah, Ali Zeb, Aijun Guo","doi":"10.1002/jid.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study evaluates the environmental impact of the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) by modelling two major policy interventions: the 2002 signing phase, representing the initial liberalization commitments, and the 2010 implementation phase, marking the full elimination of tariffs and operationalization of the agreement. For Synthetic Control Model (SCM), a synthetic control unit needs to be constructed for comparison. The current study creates synthetic China from the weight shared by different predictor variables and the control units in the donor pool. Then, both synthetic China and China were compared after the intervention to determine the effectiveness of ACFTA. This paper offers a comprehensive evaluation of ACFTA effects on China's environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and carbon emissions as proxies for environmental sustainability. The study's outcome indicates that the ACFTA significantly enhanced carbon emissions and ecological footprint after both interventions, highlighting the inclusion of strict environmental regulation into the trade agreements. Further, it suggests policy intervention and international collaboration to eradicate the negative environmental impact of free trade agreements.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Development","volume":"38 3","pages":"589-602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.70076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the environmental impact of the ASEAN–China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) by modelling two major policy interventions: the 2002 signing phase, representing the initial liberalization commitments, and the 2010 implementation phase, marking the full elimination of tariffs and operationalization of the agreement. For Synthetic Control Model (SCM), a synthetic control unit needs to be constructed for comparison. The current study creates synthetic China from the weight shared by different predictor variables and the control units in the donor pool. Then, both synthetic China and China were compared after the intervention to determine the effectiveness of ACFTA. This paper offers a comprehensive evaluation of ACFTA effects on China's environmental sustainability using ecological footprint and carbon emissions as proxies for environmental sustainability. The study's outcome indicates that the ACFTA significantly enhanced carbon emissions and ecological footprint after both interventions, highlighting the inclusion of strict environmental regulation into the trade agreements. Further, it suggests policy intervention and international collaboration to eradicate the negative environmental impact of free trade agreements.
期刊介绍:
The Journal aims to publish the best research on international development issues in a form that is accessible to practitioners and policy-makers as well as to an academic audience. The main focus is on the social sciences - economics, politics, international relations, sociology and anthropology, as well as development studies - but we also welcome articles that blend the natural and social sciences in addressing the challenges for development. The Journal does not represent any particular school, analytical technique or methodological approach, but aims to publish high quality contributions to ideas, frameworks, policy and practice, including in transitional countries and underdeveloped areas of the Global North as well as the Global South.