Beyond the Drug Label: Regulatory-Induced Complexities in Health Information

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS
Marie A. Yeh, Kristen L. Walker, Kimberly V. Legocki, Molly Torres, Meike Eilert
{"title":"Beyond the Drug Label: Regulatory-Induced Complexities in Health Information","authors":"Marie A. Yeh,&nbsp;Kristen L. Walker,&nbsp;Kimberly V. Legocki,&nbsp;Molly Torres,&nbsp;Meike Eilert","doi":"10.1111/joca.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We investigate how content-centric regulation obligates pharmaceutical companies to provide material information that includes balanced information about a drug's benefits and risks to consumers. Paradoxically, this regulatory compliant information results in information so complex it leaves a vacuum of easy-to-digest and useful consumer information. This research compares company-provided information regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (patient package inserts) with consumer-to-consumer provided information, user-generated content in the form of prescription drug reviews (UGC), coded for risk and benefit and calculating readability and linguistic metrics. We apply a consumer-centric information complexity framework which identifies the disconnect between pharmaceutical company practices (as regulated) and UGC (relatively unregulated). Analyses show that UGC drug reviews present risks and benefits in a more balanced manner than manufacturer-created patient labels. Findings identify regulatory complexity as a driver of information inadequacy that may push consumers to UGC, indicating a need for information co-production between consumers, producers and regulators.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joca.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate how content-centric regulation obligates pharmaceutical companies to provide material information that includes balanced information about a drug's benefits and risks to consumers. Paradoxically, this regulatory compliant information results in information so complex it leaves a vacuum of easy-to-digest and useful consumer information. This research compares company-provided information regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (patient package inserts) with consumer-to-consumer provided information, user-generated content in the form of prescription drug reviews (UGC), coded for risk and benefit and calculating readability and linguistic metrics. We apply a consumer-centric information complexity framework which identifies the disconnect between pharmaceutical company practices (as regulated) and UGC (relatively unregulated). Analyses show that UGC drug reviews present risks and benefits in a more balanced manner than manufacturer-created patient labels. Findings identify regulatory complexity as a driver of information inadequacy that may push consumers to UGC, indicating a need for information co-production between consumers, producers and regulators.

超越药品标签:健康信息中监管引发的复杂性
我们调查了以内容为中心的监管如何要求制药公司提供实质性信息,包括关于药物对消费者的益处和风险的平衡信息。矛盾的是,这种符合法规的信息导致信息如此复杂,以至于留下了易于消化和有用的消费者信息的真空。本研究比较了由食品和药物管理局监管的公司提供的信息(患者包装说明书)与消费者对消费者提供的信息,即以处方药评论(UGC)形式的用户生成内容,对风险和收益进行编码,并计算可读性和语言指标。我们应用了一个以消费者为中心的信息复杂性框架,该框架确定了制药公司实践(受监管)和UGC(相对不受监管)之间的脱节。分析表明,UGC药物审评比制造商创建的患者标签以更平衡的方式呈现风险和益处。研究发现,监管的复杂性是信息不足的驱动因素,可能会促使消费者转向UGC,这表明消费者、生产者和监管机构之间需要进行信息联合生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The ISI impact score of Journal of Consumer Affairs now places it among the leading business journals and one of the top handful of marketing- related publications. The immediacy index score, showing how swiftly the published studies are cited or applied in other publications, places JCA seventh of those same 77 journals. More importantly, in these difficult economic times, JCA is the leading journal whose focus for over four decades has been on the interests of consumers in the marketplace. With the journal"s origins in the consumer movement and consumer protection concerns, the focus for papers in terms of both research questions and implications must involve the consumer"s interest and topics must be addressed from the consumers point of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书