Development of a chute for improving cow movement and reducing agonistic behavior

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Grassland Science Pub Date : 2026-04-05 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI:10.1111/grs.70023
Huricha, Kiyoshi Hirano, Michio Tsutsumi, Hidetoshi Kakihara, Nariyasu Watanabe
{"title":"Development of a chute for improving cow movement and reducing agonistic behavior","authors":"Huricha,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Hirano,&nbsp;Michio Tsutsumi,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Kakihara,&nbsp;Nariyasu Watanabe","doi":"10.1111/grs.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The walk-over-weighing (WoW) system and a body weighing system utilizing a dead-end chute have been developed to reduce the labor involved in weighing grazing cows. However, challenges persist, such as abnormal body weight readings in the WoW and agonistic behavior in the dead-end chute system. In this study, the dead-end chute was redesigned with separate entrance and exit routes. The exit was positioned at a 45° outward angle at the other end from the entrance to facilitate movement away from the chute. Six cows with prior dead-end chute experience were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the improved chute design by comparing incidences of agonistic behavior, daily visit frequency, time spent per visit and time spent drinking per day between the improved chute and the dead-end chute. Six cows with no chute experience were used to investigate the learning process in the improved chute. Additionally, using the same 12 cows, we tested whether cows were more likely to use the exit or move backward toward the entrance when using the improved chute. The mean occurrence rate of agonistic behavior was significantly lower in the improved chute than in the dead-end chute. Cows with no experience entered the improved chute independently within 5 days after grazing began. Subsequently, as the number of usage days increased, the time spent per visit decreased, while drinking time was extended. In the improved chute, when no cows were present near the chute, three out of 12 cows used the forward exit; however, when other cows were present near the entrance, 10 cows exited through the exit chute. These findings suggest that the improved chute is effective for the management of grazing cattle.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"72 2","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grs.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The walk-over-weighing (WoW) system and a body weighing system utilizing a dead-end chute have been developed to reduce the labor involved in weighing grazing cows. However, challenges persist, such as abnormal body weight readings in the WoW and agonistic behavior in the dead-end chute system. In this study, the dead-end chute was redesigned with separate entrance and exit routes. The exit was positioned at a 45° outward angle at the other end from the entrance to facilitate movement away from the chute. Six cows with prior dead-end chute experience were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the improved chute design by comparing incidences of agonistic behavior, daily visit frequency, time spent per visit and time spent drinking per day between the improved chute and the dead-end chute. Six cows with no chute experience were used to investigate the learning process in the improved chute. Additionally, using the same 12 cows, we tested whether cows were more likely to use the exit or move backward toward the entrance when using the improved chute. The mean occurrence rate of agonistic behavior was significantly lower in the improved chute than in the dead-end chute. Cows with no experience entered the improved chute independently within 5 days after grazing began. Subsequently, as the number of usage days increased, the time spent per visit decreased, while drinking time was extended. In the improved chute, when no cows were present near the chute, three out of 12 cows used the forward exit; however, when other cows were present near the entrance, 10 cows exited through the exit chute. These findings suggest that the improved chute is effective for the management of grazing cattle.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改进奶牛运动和减少竞争行为的滑槽的研制
行走秤(WoW)系统和身体称重系统利用一个死角滑道已经开发,以减少劳动涉及称重放牧牛。然而,挑战仍然存在,例如魔兽世界中的异常体重读数和死角滑道系统中的激动行为。在本研究中,死角滑道被重新设计为独立的入口和出口路线。出口被定位在一个45°向外的角度在另一端从入口,以方便运动远离溜槽。通过比较改良溜槽和改良溜槽之间的对抗行为发生率、每日访问频率、每次访问时间和每天饮用时间,使用6头先前有过死角溜槽经验的奶牛来评估改进溜槽设计的有效性。选取6头没有滑槽经验的奶牛,研究改良滑槽中的学习过程。此外,使用同样的12头奶牛,我们测试了奶牛在使用改进的滑道时是否更有可能使用出口或向入口后退。改良溜槽中激动行为的平均发生率明显低于死角溜槽。无经验奶牛在放牧后5天内独立进入改良滑槽。随后,随着使用天数的增加,每次访问所花费的时间减少,而饮酒时间延长。在改进的滑道中,当滑道附近没有奶牛时,12头奶牛中有3头使用前出口;然而,当其他奶牛出现在入口附近时,有10头奶牛通过出口滑道离开。这些结果表明,改良的溜槽对放牧牛的管理是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书