{"title":"Development of a chute for improving cow movement and reducing agonistic behavior","authors":"Huricha, Kiyoshi Hirano, Michio Tsutsumi, Hidetoshi Kakihara, Nariyasu Watanabe","doi":"10.1111/grs.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The walk-over-weighing (WoW) system and a body weighing system utilizing a dead-end chute have been developed to reduce the labor involved in weighing grazing cows. However, challenges persist, such as abnormal body weight readings in the WoW and agonistic behavior in the dead-end chute system. In this study, the dead-end chute was redesigned with separate entrance and exit routes. The exit was positioned at a 45° outward angle at the other end from the entrance to facilitate movement away from the chute. Six cows with prior dead-end chute experience were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the improved chute design by comparing incidences of agonistic behavior, daily visit frequency, time spent per visit and time spent drinking per day between the improved chute and the dead-end chute. Six cows with no chute experience were used to investigate the learning process in the improved chute. Additionally, using the same 12 cows, we tested whether cows were more likely to use the exit or move backward toward the entrance when using the improved chute. The mean occurrence rate of agonistic behavior was significantly lower in the improved chute than in the dead-end chute. Cows with no experience entered the improved chute independently within 5 days after grazing began. Subsequently, as the number of usage days increased, the time spent per visit decreased, while drinking time was extended. In the improved chute, when no cows were present near the chute, three out of 12 cows used the forward exit; however, when other cows were present near the entrance, 10 cows exited through the exit chute. These findings suggest that the improved chute is effective for the management of grazing cattle.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"72 2","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grs.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The walk-over-weighing (WoW) system and a body weighing system utilizing a dead-end chute have been developed to reduce the labor involved in weighing grazing cows. However, challenges persist, such as abnormal body weight readings in the WoW and agonistic behavior in the dead-end chute system. In this study, the dead-end chute was redesigned with separate entrance and exit routes. The exit was positioned at a 45° outward angle at the other end from the entrance to facilitate movement away from the chute. Six cows with prior dead-end chute experience were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the improved chute design by comparing incidences of agonistic behavior, daily visit frequency, time spent per visit and time spent drinking per day between the improved chute and the dead-end chute. Six cows with no chute experience were used to investigate the learning process in the improved chute. Additionally, using the same 12 cows, we tested whether cows were more likely to use the exit or move backward toward the entrance when using the improved chute. The mean occurrence rate of agonistic behavior was significantly lower in the improved chute than in the dead-end chute. Cows with no experience entered the improved chute independently within 5 days after grazing began. Subsequently, as the number of usage days increased, the time spent per visit decreased, while drinking time was extended. In the improved chute, when no cows were present near the chute, three out of 12 cows used the forward exit; however, when other cows were present near the entrance, 10 cows exited through the exit chute. These findings suggest that the improved chute is effective for the management of grazing cattle.
Grassland ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields:
grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis;
pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation;
grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production;
forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value;
physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants;
breeding and genetics;
physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant
nutrition;
economics in grassland systems.