Glory A. Iorliam, Kevan B. Moffett, Amr E. Keshta, J. Patrick Megonigal, Karen L. Knee
{"title":"Using Radon (222Rn) to Trace Variability in Greenhouse Gas Emission From Tree Stems Across Species, Seasons and Stem Heights","authors":"Glory A. Iorliam, Kevan B. Moffett, Amr E. Keshta, J. Patrick Megonigal, Karen L. Knee","doi":"10.1002/eco.70207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emissions from trees are an important component of the global methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) cycle, but their spatial origins (soil vs. in-stem), transport pathways and environmental influences are not well constrained. To address these issues, this field study characterized spatial and temporal variability in stem emissions of biologically inert radon (<sup>222</sup>Rn), which is naturally enriched in soil and groundwater compared to air and surface water, and emissions of CH<sub>4</sub> and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), which can be produced and consumed biologically in soil and trees. We assessed the influences of tree species (<i>Acer rubrum</i>, <i>Taxodium distichum</i>, <i>Fagus grandifolia</i> and <i>Liriodendron tulipifera</i>), season (summer and winter), flux measurement height (40 and 140 cm) and surficial soil moisture on stem fluxes of <sup>222</sup>Rn, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>. Fluxes of all three gases showed broadly similar patterns of variability: They were greater from the wetland species <i>T. distichum</i> than the three upland tree species, greater at 40-cm compared to 140-cm stem height and greater in the summer than in the winter. However, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions showed a greater magnitude of variability across tree species and measurement heights than either <sup>222</sup>Rn or CO<sub>2</sub>. More detailed exploration of the similarities and differences in stem emissions of <sup>222</sup>Rn, CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> may help resolve uncertainties in forest greenhouse gas sources and spatiotemporal flux dynamics, enabling more accurate modelling of gas transport through the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.70207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emissions from trees are an important component of the global methane (CH4) cycle, but their spatial origins (soil vs. in-stem), transport pathways and environmental influences are not well constrained. To address these issues, this field study characterized spatial and temporal variability in stem emissions of biologically inert radon (222Rn), which is naturally enriched in soil and groundwater compared to air and surface water, and emissions of CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2), which can be produced and consumed biologically in soil and trees. We assessed the influences of tree species (Acer rubrum, Taxodium distichum, Fagus grandifolia and Liriodendron tulipifera), season (summer and winter), flux measurement height (40 and 140 cm) and surficial soil moisture on stem fluxes of 222Rn, CH4 and CO2. Fluxes of all three gases showed broadly similar patterns of variability: They were greater from the wetland species T. distichum than the three upland tree species, greater at 40-cm compared to 140-cm stem height and greater in the summer than in the winter. However, CH4 emissions showed a greater magnitude of variability across tree species and measurement heights than either 222Rn or CO2. More detailed exploration of the similarities and differences in stem emissions of 222Rn, CO2 and CH4 may help resolve uncertainties in forest greenhouse gas sources and spatiotemporal flux dynamics, enabling more accurate modelling of gas transport through the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.