Asymmetric Effects of Topographic Slopes and Bottom Friction on Lagrangian and Eulerian Eddy Diffusivities in Two-Layer QG Flow

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Miriam F. Sterl, André Palóczy, J. H. LaCasce, Michiel L. J. Baatsen, Sjoerd Groeskamp
{"title":"Asymmetric Effects of Topographic Slopes and Bottom Friction on Lagrangian and Eulerian Eddy Diffusivities in Two-Layer QG Flow","authors":"Miriam F. Sterl,&nbsp;André Palóczy,&nbsp;J. H. LaCasce,&nbsp;Michiel L. J. Baatsen,&nbsp;Sjoerd Groeskamp","doi":"10.1029/2025JC023770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate how a topographic slope impacts eddy diffusivities in a two-layer quasi-geostrophic model. There are asymmetric effects of retrograde slopes, where the layer interface and the topography tilt in the same direction, and prograde slopes, where the interface and topography tilt in opposite directions. Moreover, there is asymmetry between the upper and lower layer. Steep retrograde slopes suppress the eddy diffusivity in both layers compared to flat or weak slopes. With a strong prograde slope, coherent, long-lived vortices form in the upper layer; as these are surface-trapped, they are not influenced by topography or bottom friction, and the diffusivity in the upper layer is thus relatively unaffected by the slope. In the lower layer, however, the diffusivities decrease with slope magnitude for both prograde and retrograde slopes. We also compare the Lagrangian diffusivity, derived from particle tracking experiments, and the Eulerian diffusivity, based on the flux-gradient relation for potential vorticity (PV). The two values agree in the upper layer, but not in the lower layer. We present a new expression relating Eulerian and Lagrangian diffusivities, and this correctly captures the differences seen in the lower layer. The difference occurs because bottom friction alters the PV along the particle tracks. The results underline the importance of considering both topographic slopes and bottom friction in parametrizations of mesoscale eddy stirring.</p>","PeriodicalId":54340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","volume":"131 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JC023770","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JC023770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate how a topographic slope impacts eddy diffusivities in a two-layer quasi-geostrophic model. There are asymmetric effects of retrograde slopes, where the layer interface and the topography tilt in the same direction, and prograde slopes, where the interface and topography tilt in opposite directions. Moreover, there is asymmetry between the upper and lower layer. Steep retrograde slopes suppress the eddy diffusivity in both layers compared to flat or weak slopes. With a strong prograde slope, coherent, long-lived vortices form in the upper layer; as these are surface-trapped, they are not influenced by topography or bottom friction, and the diffusivity in the upper layer is thus relatively unaffected by the slope. In the lower layer, however, the diffusivities decrease with slope magnitude for both prograde and retrograde slopes. We also compare the Lagrangian diffusivity, derived from particle tracking experiments, and the Eulerian diffusivity, based on the flux-gradient relation for potential vorticity (PV). The two values agree in the upper layer, but not in the lower layer. We present a new expression relating Eulerian and Lagrangian diffusivities, and this correctly captures the differences seen in the lower layer. The difference occurs because bottom friction alters the PV along the particle tracks. The results underline the importance of considering both topographic slopes and bottom friction in parametrizations of mesoscale eddy stirring.

Abstract Image

地形坡度和底部摩擦对两层QG流中拉格朗日和欧拉涡动扩散系数的不对称影响
我们研究了地形坡度如何影响两层准地转模型中的涡动扩散系数。在逆行坡和顺行坡中,层界面和地形向同一方向倾斜,而在顺行坡中,界面和地形向相反方向倾斜。此外,上层和下层之间存在不对称。相对于平坡或弱坡,陡坡逆行抑制了两层的涡旋扩散率。在较强的推进坡度下,上层形成连贯的、长寿命的涡;由于这些是表面捕获的,它们不受地形或底部摩擦的影响,因此上层的扩散系数相对不受坡度的影响。而在低层,顺、逆坡的扩散系数均随坡度大小而减小。我们还比较了由粒子跟踪实验得到的拉格朗日扩散系数和基于位涡(PV)的通量梯度关系得到的欧拉扩散系数。这两个值在上层一致,但在下层不一致。我们提出了一个关于欧拉和拉格朗日扩散率的新表达式,它正确地捕捉了下层所见的差异。这种差异的产生是因为底部摩擦改变了粒子轨迹上的PV。结果强调了考虑地形坡度和底部摩擦在中尺度涡旋搅拌参数化中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans
Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
429
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书