Prediction of organic acid concentration in BRS Capiaçu elephant grass silage

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Grassland Science Pub Date : 2026-04-05 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1111/grs.70019
Isadora Osório Maciel Aguiar Freitas, Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel, Vitor Cardoso Queiroz, Marcos Jácome de Araújo, Tairon Pannunzio Dias-Silva, Rafael de Souza Miranda, Laryssa Geovana Rocha do Amarante, Sheila Vilarindo de Sousa, Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo, Gelson dos Santos Difante, João Virgínio Emerenciano Neto
{"title":"Prediction of organic acid concentration in BRS Capiaçu elephant grass silage","authors":"Isadora Osório Maciel Aguiar Freitas,&nbsp;Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel,&nbsp;Vitor Cardoso Queiroz,&nbsp;Marcos Jácome de Araújo,&nbsp;Tairon Pannunzio Dias-Silva,&nbsp;Rafael de Souza Miranda,&nbsp;Laryssa Geovana Rocha do Amarante,&nbsp;Sheila Vilarindo de Sousa,&nbsp;Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo,&nbsp;Gelson dos Santos Difante,&nbsp;João Virgínio Emerenciano Neto","doi":"10.1111/grs.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to develop prediction models for organic acid concentrations in Capiaçu grass (<i>Pennisetum purpureum</i> Schum) silage, based on fermentation parameters and chemical composition. Data were obtained from an experiment that evaluated BRS (Brazil Seeds) Capiaçu grass silage with the inclusion of dehydrated cashew pseudofruit (<i>Anacardium occidentale</i>) at levels of 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% (on a fresh matter basis). The most accurate models for predicting lactic acid used dry matter as the only predictor variable, reaching an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.98 and root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) of 1.52. In the case of acetic acid, the best prediction model combined pH and the quadratic terms of pH and buffering capacity (BC), with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.73 and RMSPE of 0.98. The most accurate prediction model for butyric acid included crude protein and BC, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.51. The prediction model with the greatest predictive capacity for propionic acid combined organic matter, BC and the quadratic term of soluble carbohydrates, reaching <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.75. Thus, prediction models for lactic acid (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.98) are suitable for field applications, whereas those for butyric acid (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.51) require caution. In the validation of the selected prediction models, all showed accuracy and precision with correlation and agreement coefficients ≥ 0.70 for most models. Prediction errors were low, and the null hypothesis (<i>β</i>₀ = 0 and <i>β</i>₁ = 1) was accepted for all prediction models. The organic acids in Capiaçu-grass silage can be estimated based on its pH and chemical composition, particularly dry matter, buffering capacity, crude protein, organic matter and soluble carbohydrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"72 2","pages":"73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grs.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop prediction models for organic acid concentrations in Capiaçu grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) silage, based on fermentation parameters and chemical composition. Data were obtained from an experiment that evaluated BRS (Brazil Seeds) Capiaçu grass silage with the inclusion of dehydrated cashew pseudofruit (Anacardium occidentale) at levels of 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% (on a fresh matter basis). The most accurate models for predicting lactic acid used dry matter as the only predictor variable, reaching an R2 of 0.98 and root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) of 1.52. In the case of acetic acid, the best prediction model combined pH and the quadratic terms of pH and buffering capacity (BC), with R2 of 0.73 and RMSPE of 0.98. The most accurate prediction model for butyric acid included crude protein and BC, with R2 of 0.51. The prediction model with the greatest predictive capacity for propionic acid combined organic matter, BC and the quadratic term of soluble carbohydrates, reaching R2 of 0.75. Thus, prediction models for lactic acid (R2 = 0.98) are suitable for field applications, whereas those for butyric acid (R2 = 0.51) require caution. In the validation of the selected prediction models, all showed accuracy and precision with correlation and agreement coefficients ≥ 0.70 for most models. Prediction errors were low, and the null hypothesis (β₀ = 0 and β₁ = 1) was accepted for all prediction models. The organic acids in Capiaçu-grass silage can be estimated based on its pH and chemical composition, particularly dry matter, buffering capacity, crude protein, organic matter and soluble carbohydrates.

草料青贮有机酸浓度的预测
本研究旨在建立基于发酵参数和化学成分的capiaaperu grass青贮有机酸浓度预测模型。本试验对巴西种子(Brazil Seeds) capia草料青贮进行了评价,其中脱水腰果假果(Anacardium occidentale)的添加水平分别为0%、10%、20%和30%(以新鲜物质为基础)。以干物质为唯一预测变量的乳酸预测模型最准确,R2为0.98,均方根预测误差(RMSPE)为1.52。以乙酸为例,pH与pH与缓冲容量(BC)的二次项相结合的预测模型最佳,R2为0.73,RMSPE为0.98。预测丁酸最准确的模型为粗蛋白质和BC, R2为0.51。预测模型对丙酸结合有机质、BC和可溶性碳水化合物二次项预测能力最强,R2为0.75。因此,乳酸(R2 = 0.98)的预测模型适用于现场应用,而丁酸(R2 = 0.51)的预测模型则需要谨慎。在对所选预测模型的验证中,大多数模型的相关系数和一致系数≥0.70,均显示出准确性和精密度。预测误差较低,所有预测模型均接受原假设(β 0 = 0, β 1 = 1)。根据草料的pH值和化学组成,特别是干物质、缓冲能力、粗蛋白质、有机质和可溶性碳水化合物,可以估算草料青贮中的有机酸含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书