Techno-Economic-Environmental Assessment of Pyrolysis-Based Power Production From Methane

IF 5.7 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammad Jalili Zarabadi, Siva Karuturi
{"title":"Techno-Economic-Environmental Assessment of Pyrolysis-Based Power Production From Methane","authors":"Muhammad Jalili Zarabadi,&nbsp;Siva Karuturi","doi":"10.1002/aesr.202500405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Methane pyrolysis enables low-carbon power generation by converting natural gas into hydrogen and solid carbon without direct carbon dioxide formation. This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic-environmental assessment of an integrated pyrolysis-based combined cycle (T-cycle) and benchmarks its performance against a conventional natural gas combined cycle (C-cycle). Thermodynamic modelling indicates that increasing pyrolysis temperature from 500°C to 1500°C enhances methane conversion (8% to 97%) and fuel LHV (51.73 to 115.3  MJ/kg) but reduces net power output (38.54 to 13.35 MW). At baseline conditions, the T-cycle achieves an ≈54% reduction in specific CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared with the C-cycle, while the electricity selling price increases from $0.13/kWh to $0.35/kWh. Parametric analyses reveal that reactor pressure improves net power but suppresses methane conversion, highlighting a trade-off between efficiency and decarbonisation. Economic results indicate that electricity price parity between the two systems can be achieved under moderate carbon pricing or through valorisation of solid carbon byproducts, with a required solid carbon price of ≈1023 $/tonne in the absence of a carbon tax. Overall, the results demonstrate the system-level potential of methane pyrolysis as a strategic decarbonisation pathway for gas-fired power generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":29794,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aesr.202500405","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aesr.202500405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methane pyrolysis enables low-carbon power generation by converting natural gas into hydrogen and solid carbon without direct carbon dioxide formation. This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic-environmental assessment of an integrated pyrolysis-based combined cycle (T-cycle) and benchmarks its performance against a conventional natural gas combined cycle (C-cycle). Thermodynamic modelling indicates that increasing pyrolysis temperature from 500°C to 1500°C enhances methane conversion (8% to 97%) and fuel LHV (51.73 to 115.3  MJ/kg) but reduces net power output (38.54 to 13.35 MW). At baseline conditions, the T-cycle achieves an ≈54% reduction in specific CO2 emissions compared with the C-cycle, while the electricity selling price increases from $0.13/kWh to $0.35/kWh. Parametric analyses reveal that reactor pressure improves net power but suppresses methane conversion, highlighting a trade-off between efficiency and decarbonisation. Economic results indicate that electricity price parity between the two systems can be achieved under moderate carbon pricing or through valorisation of solid carbon byproducts, with a required solid carbon price of ≈1023 $/tonne in the absence of a carbon tax. Overall, the results demonstrate the system-level potential of methane pyrolysis as a strategic decarbonisation pathway for gas-fired power generation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

甲烷热解发电的技术经济环境评价
甲烷热解将天然气转化为氢气和固体碳,而不直接产生二氧化碳,从而实现了低碳发电。本研究对基于热分解的综合联合循环(T-cycle)进行了全面的技术、经济和环境评估,并将其性能与传统天然气联合循环(C-cycle)进行了对比。热力学模型表明,将热解温度从500°C提高到1500°C可提高甲烷转化率(8%至97%)和燃料LHV(51.73至115.3 MJ/kg),但降低净输出功率(38.54至13.35 MW)。在基准条件下,与c循环相比,t循环的特定二氧化碳排放量减少了约54%,而电力销售价格从0.13美元/千瓦时增加到0.35美元/千瓦时。参数分析显示,反应堆压力提高了净功率,但抑制了甲烷转化,突出了效率和脱碳之间的权衡。经济结果表明,两个系统之间的电价平价可以通过适度的碳定价或通过固体碳副产品的定价来实现,在没有碳税的情况下,所需的固体碳价格为≈1023美元/吨。总体而言,研究结果表明,甲烷热解作为燃气发电的战略脱碳途径具有系统级潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research is an open access academic journal that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed research articles in the areas of energy harvesting, conversion, storage, distribution, applications, ecology, climate change, water and environmental sciences, and related societal impacts. The journal provides readers with free access to influential scientific research that has undergone rigorous peer review, a common feature of all journals in the Advanced series. In addition to original research articles, the journal publishes opinion, editorial and review articles designed to meet the needs of a broad readership interested in energy and sustainability science and related fields. In addition, Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research is indexed in several abstracting and indexing services, including: CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics) INSPEC (IET) Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书