Marianna Gonçalves Dias Chaves, Camila Ribeiro Schneider, Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri, Steffen Manfred Noe
{"title":"Commuting Challenges for Big Cities: How to Tackle Particulate Matter Human Exposure?","authors":"Marianna Gonçalves Dias Chaves, Camila Ribeiro Schneider, Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri, Steffen Manfred Noe","doi":"10.1002/clen.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Air quality in large cities is a global public health issue that has received increasing attention in recent decades. The dynamics of atmospheric pollutant concentrations form a complex system influenced by meteorology, topography, emission sources, and fleet composition, interacting in a nonlinear pattern. We monitored particulate matter (PM) in two transport modes (walking and bus) and a fixed point in Curitiba, Brazil, to understand human exposure. Real-time <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>10</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{10}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> concentrations, with GPS data, were collected using low-cost sensors and microcontrollers. Machine learning models identified key pollution drivers. Results showed that mean PM concentrations were higher inside buses. Afternoon bus samples frequently exceeded 45 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>/<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm m}^3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>10</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{10}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, surpassing WHO daily limits, while the highest walking peak (approximately 34–35 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>/<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm m}^3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) occurred near a major highway. <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>10</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{10}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> were strongly correlated, especially for walking (<i>R</i> = 0.91). Despite higher concentrations inside buses, cumulative exposure and inhaled dose were greater while walking, with average <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> exposure of 0.18 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>min</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm min}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (vs. 0.11 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>min</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm min}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> on buses) and average inhaled doses of 5.74 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (walking) versus 3.05 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (bus). Longer commute duration and increased inhalation rates explain this difference. Random Forest (RF) analysis identified boundary layer height as the most important predictor of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, followed by relative humidity and the number of SUVs. These findings highlight how meteorology, fleet composition, and travel mode shape exposure and support strategies for healthier and sustainable urban mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clen.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.70162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Air quality in large cities is a global public health issue that has received increasing attention in recent decades. The dynamics of atmospheric pollutant concentrations form a complex system influenced by meteorology, topography, emission sources, and fleet composition, interacting in a nonlinear pattern. We monitored particulate matter (PM) in two transport modes (walking and bus) and a fixed point in Curitiba, Brazil, to understand human exposure. Real-time and concentrations, with GPS data, were collected using low-cost sensors and microcontrollers. Machine learning models identified key pollution drivers. Results showed that mean PM concentrations were higher inside buses. Afternoon bus samples frequently exceeded 45 / for , surpassing WHO daily limits, while the highest walking peak (approximately 34–35 /) occurred near a major highway. and were strongly correlated, especially for walking (R = 0.91). Despite higher concentrations inside buses, cumulative exposure and inhaled dose were greater while walking, with average exposure of 0.18 (vs. 0.11 on buses) and average inhaled doses of 5.74 (walking) versus 3.05 (bus). Longer commute duration and increased inhalation rates explain this difference. Random Forest (RF) analysis identified boundary layer height as the most important predictor of , followed by relative humidity and the number of SUVs. These findings highlight how meteorology, fleet composition, and travel mode shape exposure and support strategies for healthier and sustainable urban mobility.
期刊介绍:
CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications.
Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.