Commuting Challenges for Big Cities: How to Tackle Particulate Matter Human Exposure?

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Marianna Gonçalves Dias Chaves, Camila Ribeiro Schneider, Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri, Steffen Manfred Noe
{"title":"Commuting Challenges for Big Cities: How to Tackle Particulate Matter Human Exposure?","authors":"Marianna Gonçalves Dias Chaves,&nbsp;Camila Ribeiro Schneider,&nbsp;Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri,&nbsp;Steffen Manfred Noe","doi":"10.1002/clen.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Air quality in large cities is a global public health issue that has received increasing attention in recent decades. The dynamics of atmospheric pollutant concentrations form a complex system influenced by meteorology, topography, emission sources, and fleet composition, interacting in a nonlinear pattern. We monitored particulate matter (PM) in two transport modes (walking and bus) and a fixed point in Curitiba, Brazil, to understand human exposure. Real-time <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>10</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{10}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> concentrations, with GPS data, were collected using low-cost sensors and microcontrollers. Machine learning models identified key pollution drivers. Results showed that mean PM concentrations were higher inside buses. Afternoon bus samples frequently exceeded 45 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>/<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm m}^3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>10</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{10}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, surpassing WHO daily limits, while the highest walking peak (approximately 34–35 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>/<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm m}^3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) occurred near a major highway. <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>10</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{10}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> were strongly correlated, especially for walking (<i>R</i> = 0.91). Despite higher concentrations inside buses, cumulative exposure and inhaled dose were greater while walking, with average <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> exposure of 0.18 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>min</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm min}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (vs. 0.11 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>min</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm min}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> on buses) and average inhaled doses of 5.74 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (walking) versus 3.05 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mi>g</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mu{\\rm g}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (bus). Longer commute duration and increased inhalation rates explain this difference. Random Forest (RF) analysis identified boundary layer height as the most important predictor of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>PM</mi>\n <mn>2.5</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm PM}_{2.5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, followed by relative humidity and the number of SUVs. These findings highlight how meteorology, fleet composition, and travel mode shape exposure and support strategies for healthier and sustainable urban mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clen.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.70162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air quality in large cities is a global public health issue that has received increasing attention in recent decades. The dynamics of atmospheric pollutant concentrations form a complex system influenced by meteorology, topography, emission sources, and fleet composition, interacting in a nonlinear pattern. We monitored particulate matter (PM) in two transport modes (walking and bus) and a fixed point in Curitiba, Brazil, to understand human exposure. Real-time PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$ and PM 10 ${\rm PM}_{10}$ concentrations, with GPS data, were collected using low-cost sensors and microcontrollers. Machine learning models identified key pollution drivers. Results showed that mean PM concentrations were higher inside buses. Afternoon bus samples frequently exceeded 45 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ / m 3 ${\rm m}^3$ for PM 10 ${\rm PM}_{10}$ , surpassing WHO daily limits, while the highest walking peak (approximately 34–35 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ / m 3 ${\rm m}^3$ ) occurred near a major highway. PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$ and PM 10 ${\rm PM}_{10}$ were strongly correlated, especially for walking (R = 0.91). Despite higher concentrations inside buses, cumulative exposure and inhaled dose were greater while walking, with average PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$ exposure of 0.18 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ min 1 ${\rm min}^{-1}$ (vs. 0.11 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ min 1 ${\rm min}^{-1}$ on buses) and average inhaled doses of 5.74 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ (walking) versus 3.05 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ (bus). Longer commute duration and increased inhalation rates explain this difference. Random Forest (RF) analysis identified boundary layer height as the most important predictor of PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$ , followed by relative humidity and the number of SUVs. These findings highlight how meteorology, fleet composition, and travel mode shape exposure and support strategies for healthier and sustainable urban mobility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大城市的通勤挑战:如何解决人体暴露的颗粒物?
大城市的空气质量是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,近几十年来受到越来越多的关注。大气污染物浓度的动态形成了一个复杂的系统,受气象、地形、排放源和船队组成的影响,并以非线性模式相互作用。我们监测了两种交通方式(步行和公共汽车)和巴西库里提巴的一个固定点的颗粒物(PM),以了解人类暴露情况。实时PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$和PM 10 ${\rm PM}_{10}$浓度,利用GPS数据,采用低成本传感器和微控制器采集。机器学习模型确定了主要的污染驱动因素。结果表明,公交车内的PM平均浓度较高。下午公交车样品经常超过45 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ / m 3$ {\rm m}^3$对于PM 10 ${\rm PM}_{10}$,超过了世卫组织的每日限制,而最高步行高峰(约34-35 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ / m3 ${\rm m}^3$)发生在一条主要高速公路附近。PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$与PM 10 ${\rm PM}_{10}$相关性较强(R = 0.91)。尽管公共汽车内的浓度较高,但步行时的累积暴露量和吸入量更大,平均PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$暴露量为0.18 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ min−1${\rm min}^{-1}$(公共汽车为0.11 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$ min−1 ${\rm min}^{-1}$),平均吸入剂量为5.74μ g $\mu{\rm g}$(步行)与3.05 μ g $\mu{\rm g}$(公交车)。较长的通勤时间和增加的吸入率解释了这种差异。随机森林(RF)分析发现,边界层高度是PM 2.5 ${\rm PM}_{2.5}$最重要的预测因子,其次是相对湿度和suv数量。这些发现强调了气象学、车队组成和出行方式如何塑造暴露和支持更健康和可持续的城市交通战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clean-soil Air Water
Clean-soil Air Water 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications. Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书