Identifying influential observations in concurrent functional regression with weighted bootstrap

IF 2.1 4区 计算机科学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Ryan D. Pittman, David B. Hitchcock
{"title":"Identifying influential observations in concurrent functional regression with weighted bootstrap","authors":"Ryan D. Pittman,&nbsp;David B. Hitchcock","doi":"10.1007/s11634-024-00607-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Metrics such as <i>DFBETAS</i>, <i>DFFITS</i>, and Cook’s Distance are used in ordinary linear regression to assess the influence each individual observation has on the fitted model. Here we quantify the influence of functional observations in the concurrent functional linear model where both predictor and response are functional objects, presenting four measures to identify which functional observations are the most influential on the results. We introduce a novel weighted bootstrapping with perturbations method to identify when an observation is significantly influential on the fitted functional regression model. We show this method’s validity using a simulation study and two real data examples. In the first example, our new measures are deployed on paired river heights during ten past flood events. Our method identifies which of the ten past flood observations has the most impact (and whether it is significant) on the functional linear model. These results also show which flood event most alters the relationship between the two river heights. The second example involves concurrently observed air and water temperature functions at 35 locations across the United States coastline. Our method identifies the location(s) with significant influence on the functional linear model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49270,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","volume":"20 :","pages":"197 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11634-024-00607-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metrics such as DFBETAS, DFFITS, and Cook’s Distance are used in ordinary linear regression to assess the influence each individual observation has on the fitted model. Here we quantify the influence of functional observations in the concurrent functional linear model where both predictor and response are functional objects, presenting four measures to identify which functional observations are the most influential on the results. We introduce a novel weighted bootstrapping with perturbations method to identify when an observation is significantly influential on the fitted functional regression model. We show this method’s validity using a simulation study and two real data examples. In the first example, our new measures are deployed on paired river heights during ten past flood events. Our method identifies which of the ten past flood observations has the most impact (and whether it is significant) on the functional linear model. These results also show which flood event most alters the relationship between the two river heights. The second example involves concurrently observed air and water temperature functions at 35 locations across the United States coastline. Our method identifies the location(s) with significant influence on the functional linear model.

Abstract Image

用加权自举法识别并发函数回归中有影响的观测值
DFBETAS、DFFITS和库克距离等指标在普通线性回归中用于评估每个单独观测对拟合模型的影响。在此,我们量化了预测器和响应都是功能对象的并发功能线性模型中功能观察的影响,提出了四种方法来确定哪些功能观察对结果影响最大。我们引入了一种新的带扰动的加权自举方法来识别一个观测值何时对拟合的函数回归模型有显著影响。通过仿真研究和两个实例验证了该方法的有效性。在第一个例子中,我们的新措施部署在过去十次洪水事件中成对的河流高度上。我们的方法确定了过去10次洪水观测中哪一次对函数线性模型影响最大(以及是否显著)。这些结果还表明,哪个洪水事件最能改变两河高度之间的关系。第二个例子涉及在美国海岸线上35个地点同时观测到的空气和水温函数。我们的方法确定了对功能线性模型有重大影响的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal Advances in Data Analysis and Classification (ADAC) is designed as a forum for high standard publications on research and applications concerning the extraction of knowable aspects from many types of data. It publishes articles on such topics as structural, quantitative, or statistical approaches for the analysis of data; advances in classification, clustering, and pattern recognition methods; strategies for modeling complex data and mining large data sets; methods for the extraction of knowledge from data, and applications of advanced methods in specific domains of practice. Articles illustrate how new domain-specific knowledge can be made available from data by skillful use of data analysis methods. The journal also publishes survey papers that outline, and illuminate the basic ideas and techniques of special approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书