{"title":"EXPRESS: Climate Communications in IPOs: Unpacking the Influence of Climate Disclosure Volume, Sender, and Message Characteristics","authors":"Ankit Anand, Alok R. Saboo, Ritesh Adhyapak","doi":"10.1177/00222429261444729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate disclosures have emerged as a prominent communication tool for firms facing growing pressure to address climate challenges, yet their impact on firm performance remains unclear. This study proposes a nonlinear (U-shaped) relationship between climate disclosure volume and IPO firm performance, grounded in a damage-limitation logic. At low to moderate levels, disclosures amplify risk salience and proprietary costs, damaging valuations. At higher levels, offsetting benefits related to information, stewardship, and climate-friendly reputation outweigh these costs. Using multi-sourced data from 1,586 IPO firms, a BERT-based large language model to identify climate-related text in prospectuses, and econometric methods that address endogeneity, the authors find support for the proposed U-shaped relationship. The research further demonstrates that sender characteristics (underwriter reputation, customer concentration, and market orientation) and message characteristics (discretionary disclosure and message clarity) moderate the nonlinear relationship. Post-hoc analyses decomposing disclosure content reveal that climate risk disclosures damage valuations. In contrast, climate risk-management disclosures (governance, strategy, and metrics/targets) generate positive effects, suggesting that disclosure effectiveness depends on both volume and content composition. These effects persist in the long-term performance of firms. The findings provide actionable insights for firms developing disclosure strategies and policymakers encouraging climate-related communication.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429261444729","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate disclosures have emerged as a prominent communication tool for firms facing growing pressure to address climate challenges, yet their impact on firm performance remains unclear. This study proposes a nonlinear (U-shaped) relationship between climate disclosure volume and IPO firm performance, grounded in a damage-limitation logic. At low to moderate levels, disclosures amplify risk salience and proprietary costs, damaging valuations. At higher levels, offsetting benefits related to information, stewardship, and climate-friendly reputation outweigh these costs. Using multi-sourced data from 1,586 IPO firms, a BERT-based large language model to identify climate-related text in prospectuses, and econometric methods that address endogeneity, the authors find support for the proposed U-shaped relationship. The research further demonstrates that sender characteristics (underwriter reputation, customer concentration, and market orientation) and message characteristics (discretionary disclosure and message clarity) moderate the nonlinear relationship. Post-hoc analyses decomposing disclosure content reveal that climate risk disclosures damage valuations. In contrast, climate risk-management disclosures (governance, strategy, and metrics/targets) generate positive effects, suggesting that disclosure effectiveness depends on both volume and content composition. These effects persist in the long-term performance of firms. The findings provide actionable insights for firms developing disclosure strategies and policymakers encouraging climate-related communication.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.