EXPRESS: The ABCs of Marketing Principles: A Principles-Based Framework for Marketing Alignment and Adaptation

IF 10.4 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Molly R. Burchett, Brian Murtha, Bernard J. Jaworski
{"title":"EXPRESS: The ABCs of Marketing Principles: A Principles-Based Framework for Marketing Alignment and Adaptation","authors":"Molly R. Burchett, Brian Murtha, Bernard J. Jaworski","doi":"10.1177/00222429261445812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research on marketing principles focuses mainly on the benefits of using a relatively small set of high-level principles. However, based on 38 in-depth interviews with marketing professionals across firms and industries, we find that principles are far more widespread and hierarchically layered. Informed by these insights, the present research complements prior research by introducing the “ABC” framework of marketing principles: a principles-based system of marketing alignment and adaptation based on Articulating, Bridging, and Calibrating principles throughout an organization. <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Articulating</jats:italic> highlights the tradeoffs of varying a principle’s specificity. Less specific principles offer decision-making flexibility that fosters adaptation but increases misalignment costs (i.e., increased marketing resource misallocation, marketer mental burden, and marketing sprawl). More specific principles offer decision-making clarity that fosters alignment but increases maladaptation costs (i.e., increased marketing staleness, reduced marketer professional development, and increased opportunity costs). To address these tensions, this research identifies two key cost-mitigation processes: <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Bridging</jats:italic> , which involves translating less specific principles into more contextualized guidance, and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Calibrating,</jats:italic> which involves evaluating and refining more specific principles to ensure they fit with changing conditions. Collectively, these insights underscore a new prescriptive framework for executing the ABC framework to achieve aligned and adaptive marketing strategy execution.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"247 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429261445812","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research on marketing principles focuses mainly on the benefits of using a relatively small set of high-level principles. However, based on 38 in-depth interviews with marketing professionals across firms and industries, we find that principles are far more widespread and hierarchically layered. Informed by these insights, the present research complements prior research by introducing the “ABC” framework of marketing principles: a principles-based system of marketing alignment and adaptation based on Articulating, Bridging, and Calibrating principles throughout an organization. Articulating highlights the tradeoffs of varying a principle’s specificity. Less specific principles offer decision-making flexibility that fosters adaptation but increases misalignment costs (i.e., increased marketing resource misallocation, marketer mental burden, and marketing sprawl). More specific principles offer decision-making clarity that fosters alignment but increases maladaptation costs (i.e., increased marketing staleness, reduced marketer professional development, and increased opportunity costs). To address these tensions, this research identifies two key cost-mitigation processes: Bridging , which involves translating less specific principles into more contextualized guidance, and Calibrating, which involves evaluating and refining more specific principles to ensure they fit with changing conditions. Collectively, these insights underscore a new prescriptive framework for executing the ABC framework to achieve aligned and adaptive marketing strategy execution.
EXPRESS:营销原则的abc:营销对齐和适应的基于原则的框架
先前对营销原则的研究主要集中在使用一组相对较少的高级原则的好处上。然而,基于对38家公司和行业的营销专业人士的深度访谈,我们发现这些原则更为广泛和分层。根据这些见解,本研究通过引入营销原则的“ABC”框架来补充先前的研究:这是一个基于原则的营销协调和适应系统,该系统基于整个组织的衔接、衔接和校准原则。阐明强调了改变原则特殊性的权衡。不太具体的原则提供了决策灵活性,促进了适应,但增加了不一致的成本(即,增加了营销资源的错误分配,营销人员的心理负担和营销蔓延)。更具体的原则提供了清晰的决策,促进了一致性,但增加了适应不良的成本(即,增加了营销的过时性,减少了营销人员的专业发展,增加了机会成本)。为了解决这些紧张关系,本研究确定了两个关键的成本缓解过程:衔接,涉及将不太具体的原则转化为更具体的指导,以及校准,涉及评估和完善更具体的原则,以确保它们适应不断变化的条件。总的来说,这些见解强调了执行ABC框架的一个新的规范性框架,以实现一致和适应性的营销策略执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书