Probiotic Prophylaxis for Enterococcus cecorum Prevalence in the Free Thoracic Vertebra of Broiler Chickens.

IF 1.3
Matthew K Jones, Charles L Hofacre, M Mitsu Suyemoto, Enid T McKinley, Alexandra H Smith, Jodi Delago, Roy D Berghaus, Virginia A Baxter, John A Smith
{"title":"Probiotic Prophylaxis for <i>Enterococcus cecorum</i> Prevalence in the Free Thoracic Vertebra of Broiler Chickens.","authors":"Matthew K Jones, Charles L Hofacre, M Mitsu Suyemoto, Enid T McKinley, Alexandra H Smith, Jodi Delago, Roy D Berghaus, Virginia A Baxter, John A Smith","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-25-00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Enterococcus cecorum</i> has become a significant pathogen of broilers and broiler breeders worldwide, and there are few effective prevention, treatment, or control measures. Improved, preferably nonantibiotic tools are needed to control the disease. Two pen trials were conducted to assess the effectiveness of a day-of-age probiotic and a continuous direct fed microbial (DFM) in preventing colonization of the spleen and free thoracic vertebra after challenge with pathogenic <i>E. cecorum</i> in commercial broiler chickens. In Experiment 1, three treatment groups were administered either no treatment (challenge controls), a day-of-age probiotic gel plus DFM 1 continuously in the feed, or the probiotic plus DFM 2, and challenged orally on Day 0 with a known pathogenic strain of <i>E. cecorum</i> (SA3). Both treatments resulted in a significant decrease in prevalence of colonization of spleens and free thoracic vertebrae at Day 42 compared to the challenge controls, with no effects on performance parameters or total mortality. In Experiment 2, four treatment groups were administered either no treatment (challenge controls), the day-of-age probiotic gel alone, the probiotic gel plus DFM 1, or DFM 1 alone. At 42 days of age, both the probiotic alone and the probiotic plus DFM 1 resulted in a significant decrease in colonization of the free thoracic vertebrae compared to the challenge controls, with the DFM alone being statistically intermediate. There were no impacts on performance parameters, livability, or lameness compared to the challenge controls. These results suggest that the day-of-age probiotic and the DFM may be a useful tool in controlling enterococcal spondylitis, and further larger-scale trials are warranted to assess impacts on clinical signs and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":516846,"journal":{"name":"Avian diseases","volume":"70 1","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-25-00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enterococcus cecorum has become a significant pathogen of broilers and broiler breeders worldwide, and there are few effective prevention, treatment, or control measures. Improved, preferably nonantibiotic tools are needed to control the disease. Two pen trials were conducted to assess the effectiveness of a day-of-age probiotic and a continuous direct fed microbial (DFM) in preventing colonization of the spleen and free thoracic vertebra after challenge with pathogenic E. cecorum in commercial broiler chickens. In Experiment 1, three treatment groups were administered either no treatment (challenge controls), a day-of-age probiotic gel plus DFM 1 continuously in the feed, or the probiotic plus DFM 2, and challenged orally on Day 0 with a known pathogenic strain of E. cecorum (SA3). Both treatments resulted in a significant decrease in prevalence of colonization of spleens and free thoracic vertebrae at Day 42 compared to the challenge controls, with no effects on performance parameters or total mortality. In Experiment 2, four treatment groups were administered either no treatment (challenge controls), the day-of-age probiotic gel alone, the probiotic gel plus DFM 1, or DFM 1 alone. At 42 days of age, both the probiotic alone and the probiotic plus DFM 1 resulted in a significant decrease in colonization of the free thoracic vertebrae compared to the challenge controls, with the DFM alone being statistically intermediate. There were no impacts on performance parameters, livability, or lameness compared to the challenge controls. These results suggest that the day-of-age probiotic and the DFM may be a useful tool in controlling enterococcal spondylitis, and further larger-scale trials are warranted to assess impacts on clinical signs and performance.

益生菌预防肉仔鸡游离胸椎盲肠球菌流行的研究。
盲肠球菌已成为世界范围内肉鸡和肉鸡饲养者的重要病原体,目前缺乏有效的预防、治疗和控制措施。需要改进的、最好是非抗生素的工具来控制这种疾病。为研究日龄益生菌和连续直接饲喂微生物(DFM)对商品肉鸡致病性盲肠杆菌攻毒后脾脏和游离胸椎定植的影响,进行了两项猪栏试验。在试验1中,三个处理组分别给予不处理(攻毒对照组)、在饲料中持续添加益生菌凝胶和dfm1,或在饲料中添加dfm2,并在第0天用已知致病性盲肠肠杆菌(SA3)进行攻毒。与挑战对照组相比,这两种处理在第42天均显著降低了脾脏和游离胸椎的定植率,对性能参数或总死亡率没有影响。在实验2中,4个处理组分别给予不处理(攻毒对照组)、单独使用日龄益生菌凝胶、益生菌凝胶加DFM - 1或单独使用DFM - 1。在42日龄时,与挑战对照组相比,单独使用益生菌和益生菌加DFM 1都能显著减少游离胸椎的定植,而DFM单独使用在统计学上处于中间水平。与挑战对照组相比,对性能参数、宜居性或跛行没有影响。这些结果表明,日龄益生菌和DFM可能是控制肠球菌性脊柱炎的有用工具,需要进一步进行更大规模的试验来评估对临床症状和性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书