{"title":"Treatment strategies for amblyopia in adults: an overview of conventional methods and new technologies.","authors":"Przemysław Ciszewski","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2025.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This review evaluates the efficacy of conventional and emerging therapies for amblyopia in adults, challenging the traditional notion of limited neuroplasticity beyond childhood. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of methods such as perceptual learning, dichoptic training, virtual reality (VR), and pharmacological interventions in improving visual acuity, binocular vision, and perceptual functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (1996-2025). Keywords included amblyopia treatment, adult neuroplasticity, dichoptic training, and VR therapy. Inclusion criteria prioritized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses focusing on adult amblyopia. Studies on pediatric populations, animal models, and non-scientific articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reviewed studies indicated that conventional treatments, such as refractive correction and occlusion therapy, offer limited efficacy in adult amblyopia, with modest improvements in visual acuity. In contrast, emerging therapeutic strategies-including dichoptic training, virtual reality-based interventions, neuromodulation techniques, and selected pharmacological agents-demonstrated more substantial and sustained gains in both acuity and binocular function. These modern approaches appear to leverage neuroplasticity more effectively, particularly when combined with engaging, perceptually balanced stimuli and periodic reinforcement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The reviewed evidence indicated that although conventional therapies offer limited improvement in adults, modern neuroplasticity-based methods provide more substantial and consistent benefits. Emerging techniques such as perceptual learning, dichoptic stimulation, and VR/AR interventions demonstrate significant gains not only in visual acuity but also in binocular integration. However, heterogeneous study designs and limited long-term data highlight the need for standardized protocols and further clinical validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adult amblyopia therapy is feasible due to retained neuroplasticity. Emerging technologies (VR, dichoptic training) and neuromodulation outperform conventional methods, particularly for binocular vision. However, individualized protocols and long-term efficacy studies are needed. Future research should optimize cost-effective, standardized treatments for clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"69 4","pages":"467-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2025.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This review evaluates the efficacy of conventional and emerging therapies for amblyopia in adults, challenging the traditional notion of limited neuroplasticity beyond childhood. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of methods such as perceptual learning, dichoptic training, virtual reality (VR), and pharmacological interventions in improving visual acuity, binocular vision, and perceptual functions.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (1996-2025). Keywords included amblyopia treatment, adult neuroplasticity, dichoptic training, and VR therapy. Inclusion criteria prioritized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses focusing on adult amblyopia. Studies on pediatric populations, animal models, and non-scientific articles were excluded.
Results: The reviewed studies indicated that conventional treatments, such as refractive correction and occlusion therapy, offer limited efficacy in adult amblyopia, with modest improvements in visual acuity. In contrast, emerging therapeutic strategies-including dichoptic training, virtual reality-based interventions, neuromodulation techniques, and selected pharmacological agents-demonstrated more substantial and sustained gains in both acuity and binocular function. These modern approaches appear to leverage neuroplasticity more effectively, particularly when combined with engaging, perceptually balanced stimuli and periodic reinforcement.
Discussion: The reviewed evidence indicated that although conventional therapies offer limited improvement in adults, modern neuroplasticity-based methods provide more substantial and consistent benefits. Emerging techniques such as perceptual learning, dichoptic stimulation, and VR/AR interventions demonstrate significant gains not only in visual acuity but also in binocular integration. However, heterogeneous study designs and limited long-term data highlight the need for standardized protocols and further clinical validation.
Conclusions: Adult amblyopia therapy is feasible due to retained neuroplasticity. Emerging technologies (VR, dichoptic training) and neuromodulation outperform conventional methods, particularly for binocular vision. However, individualized protocols and long-term efficacy studies are needed. Future research should optimize cost-effective, standardized treatments for clinical adoption.
目的:本综述评估了成人弱视的传统和新兴治疗方法的疗效,挑战了儿童以后神经可塑性有限的传统观念。该研究旨在比较感知学习、二分训练、虚拟现实(VR)和药物干预等方法在改善视力、双眼视觉和感知功能方面的有效性。方法:系统检索PubMed、谷歌Scholar、Scopus和Web of Science(1996-2025)的文献。关键词弱视治疗,成人神经可塑性,二分训练,VR治疗。纳入标准优先考虑成人弱视的临床试验、系统评价和荟萃分析。排除了儿科人群、动物模型和非科学文章的研究。结果:回顾的研究表明,传统的治疗方法,如屈光矫正和遮挡治疗,对成人弱视的疗效有限,视力的改善幅度不大。相比之下,新兴的治疗策略——包括双视训练、基于虚拟现实的干预、神经调节技术和选择的药理学药物——在视力和双眼功能方面都表现出了更实质性和持续的改善。这些现代方法似乎更有效地利用了神经可塑性,特别是当与参与、感知平衡的刺激和周期性强化相结合时。讨论:回顾的证据表明,尽管传统疗法对成人的改善有限,但现代基于神经可塑性的方法提供了更实质性和一致的益处。新兴技术,如知觉学习、二元刺激和VR/AR干预,不仅在视力方面,而且在双目整合方面都取得了重大进展。然而,异质性研究设计和有限的长期数据突出了标准化方案和进一步临床验证的必要性。结论:由于保留了神经可塑性,成人弱视治疗是可行的。新兴技术(虚拟现实,二分训练)和神经调节优于传统方法,特别是在双目视觉方面。然而,个性化方案和长期疗效研究是必要的。未来的研究应优化具有成本效益的标准化治疗方法,以供临床采用。