Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.

IF 1.1
Circulation reports Pub Date : 2026-02-20 eCollection Date: 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0320
Tetsuya Takahashi, Taiga Ishigaki, Wataru Katawaki, Taku Toshima, Yu Kumagai, Tamon Yamanaka, Masafumi Watanabe
{"title":"Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.","authors":"Tetsuya Takahashi, Taiga Ishigaki, Wataru Katawaki, Taku Toshima, Yu Kumagai, Tamon Yamanaka, Masafumi Watanabe","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a novel treatment option for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The presence of heart failure (HF) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the clinical significance of DCB-based PCI in CAD patients with HF is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort study from a prospective, single center registry from 2015 to 2024. We enrolled 258 CAD patients with chronic HF who underwent PCI with DCB or in combination with a drug-eluting stent (DES). Propensity score matching analysis was performed between the DCB-based PCI and DES-only PCI groups. The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause mortality. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The total DES number and length were significantly reduced in patients with DCB-based PCI than in those with DES-only PCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the DCB-based PCI group had a significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality compared with the DES-only group (log-rank test, P=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In CAD patients with chronic HF, DCB-based PCI was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with DES-only PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"8 4","pages":"626-633"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a novel treatment option for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The presence of heart failure (HF) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the clinical significance of DCB-based PCI in CAD patients with HF is unknown.

Methods and results: This was a retrospective analysis of a cohort study from a prospective, single center registry from 2015 to 2024. We enrolled 258 CAD patients with chronic HF who underwent PCI with DCB or in combination with a drug-eluting stent (DES). Propensity score matching analysis was performed between the DCB-based PCI and DES-only PCI groups. The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause mortality. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The total DES number and length were significantly reduced in patients with DCB-based PCI than in those with DES-only PCI. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the DCB-based PCI group had a significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality compared with the DES-only group (log-rank test, P=0.04).

Conclusions: In CAD patients with chronic HF, DCB-based PCI was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with DES-only PCI.

药物包被球囊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠心病合并慢性心力衰竭的临床影响
背景:药物包被球囊(DCB)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的一种新的治疗选择。冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者出现心力衰竭(HF)与预后不良相关。然而,基于dbc的PCI在冠心病合并心衰患者中的临床意义尚不清楚。方法和结果:这是一项回顾性分析,来自2015年至2024年的前瞻性单中心注册队列研究。我们招募了258例CAD合并慢性心衰患者,他们接受PCI合并DCB或联合药物洗脱支架(DES)。在基于dbc的PCI组和仅des的PCI组之间进行倾向评分匹配分析。本研究的主要终点是全因死亡率。两组之间的基线临床特征具有可比性。与仅行DES- PCI的患者相比,行基于dbc的PCI的患者DES总数和长度明显减少。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,基于dcb的PCI组的全因死亡率明显低于仅des组(log-rank检验,P=0.04)。结论:在合并慢性心衰的CAD患者中,基于dbc的PCI与仅des的PCI相比死亡率风险更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书