Impact assessment of [18F]FDG PET/CT in predicting EGFR gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using recovery coefficient-based correction of semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics.

IF 1.2
Aleksei Leontev, Angelina Lokhova, Aleksandr Khalimon, Malika Khodzhibekova, Tatyana Lazutina, Gulnara Khamadeeva, Daria Khodakova, Irina Pylova, Vitaly Bobrov, Leila Atakishieva, Natalia Kadymova, Anastasia Nikiforuk, Bogdan Shvets, Nadezhda Volchenko, Viktoriya Surkova, Petr Shatalov, Andrey Kaprin
{"title":"Impact assessment of [18F]FDG PET/CT in predicting EGFR gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using recovery coefficient-based correction of semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics.","authors":"Aleksei Leontev, Angelina Lokhova, Aleksandr Khalimon, Malika Khodzhibekova, Tatyana Lazutina, Gulnara Khamadeeva, Daria Khodakova, Irina Pylova, Vitaly Bobrov, Leila Atakishieva, Natalia Kadymova, Anastasia Nikiforuk, Bogdan Shvets, Nadezhda Volchenko, Viktoriya Surkova, Petr Shatalov, Andrey Kaprin","doi":"10.1055/a-2777-2278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the impact of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in predicting EGFR gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using recovery coefficient-based (RC-based) correction of semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics.A retrospective multi-center study included 63 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT. Acquisition was performed according to the EANM guidelines using two EARL-accredited PET/CT-systems. All patients were divided into an EGFR-mutant (n=30) and a wild-type (n=33) groups based on the results of molecular testing. Maximal diameter and CT volume of each primary tumor lesion were measured. [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG uptake was evaluated by measurement of semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics such as SUVmax, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG. TLG was measured using PET segmentation method by 3D-Isocontour tool with a 41% of SUVmax threshold (TLG<sub>41%</sub>) and a threshold adapted to the CT volume (TLG<sub>CT</sub>). Additionally, TLR was calculated as the ratio of tumor SUVpeak to liver SUVmean. Acquisition data of the NEMA IEC Body Phantom Set NU2-2018 were applied for plotting the RC curves which were used for following RC-based correction of PET metrics.No significant difference in tumor lesion maximal diameter, CT volume, evaluated values of PET metrics before and after RC-based correction was found between the EGFR-mutant and wild-type groups (p > 0.05).Observed semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics obtained from [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT have no significant value for predicting EGFR gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, regardless of whether RC-based correction is applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2777-2278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of [18F]FDG PET/CT in predicting EGFR gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma using recovery coefficient-based (RC-based) correction of semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics.A retrospective multi-center study included 63 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT. Acquisition was performed according to the EANM guidelines using two EARL-accredited PET/CT-systems. All patients were divided into an EGFR-mutant (n=30) and a wild-type (n=33) groups based on the results of molecular testing. Maximal diameter and CT volume of each primary tumor lesion were measured. [18F]FDG uptake was evaluated by measurement of semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics such as SUVmax, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG. TLG was measured using PET segmentation method by 3D-Isocontour tool with a 41% of SUVmax threshold (TLG41%) and a threshold adapted to the CT volume (TLGCT). Additionally, TLR was calculated as the ratio of tumor SUVpeak to liver SUVmean. Acquisition data of the NEMA IEC Body Phantom Set NU2-2018 were applied for plotting the RC curves which were used for following RC-based correction of PET metrics.No significant difference in tumor lesion maximal diameter, CT volume, evaluated values of PET metrics before and after RC-based correction was found between the EGFR-mutant and wild-type groups (p > 0.05).Observed semi-quantitative and volume-based PET metrics obtained from [18F]FDG PET/CT have no significant value for predicting EGFR gene mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, regardless of whether RC-based correction is applied.

采用基于恢复系数的半定量和基于体积的PET指标校正FDG PET/CT对肺腺癌患者EGFR基因突变状态的影响评估[18F]。
本研究的目的是评估[18F]FDG PET/CT在预测肺腺癌患者EGFR基因突变状态方面的影响,采用基于恢复系数(RC-based)的半定量和基于体积的PET指标校正。一项回顾性多中心研究纳入63例诊断为肺腺癌的患者,并进行了[18F]FDG PET/CT检查。根据EANM指南,使用两套earl认可的PET/ ct系统进行采集。根据分子检测结果将所有患者分为egfr突变型组(n=30)和野生型组(n=33)。测量每个原发肿瘤病灶的最大直径和CT体积。[18F]通过测量半定量和基于体积的PET指标(如SUVmax、SUVpeak、MTV和TLG)来评估FDG摄取。TLG采用PET分割方法,采用3d -等高线工具,采用41%的SUVmax阈值(TLG41%)和适应CT体积的阈值(TLGCT)。TLR以肿瘤SUVpeak与肝脏SUVmean之比计算。采用NEMA IEC Body Phantom Set NU2-2018的采集数据绘制RC曲线,用于后续基于RC的PET指标校正。egfr突变型组与野生型组肿瘤病灶最大直径、CT体积、PET指标评价值在rc校正前后均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。从[18F]FDG PET/CT中观察到的半定量和基于体积的PET指标对于预测肺腺癌患者的EGFR基因突变状态没有显著价值,无论是否应用基于rc的校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书