{"title":"Clinical presentations and prognostication of HER2-low and HER2-zero early breast cancer in Taiwan.","authors":"Yen-Jen Grace Chen, Pei-Ju Lien, Ling-Ming Tseng, Chi-Cheng Huang","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human epidermal growth factor receptor II (HER2)-low breast cancer has emerged as a clinically relevant subset of HER2-negative disease, but its prognostic significance in early-stage, real-world populations remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinicopathological features and outcomes of HER2-low vs HER2-zero early breast cancers using a nationwide registry and to clarify the impact of hormone receptor (HR) status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry (2011-2020). Eligible cases were stages 0 to III HER2-negative breast cancers managed with upfront surgery. We compared clinical characteristics , overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). All analyses were stratified by HR (positive vs negative) and by pathological stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 38 773 patients; 65.4% were HER2-low and 34.6% were HER2-zero. HER2-low tumors were diagnosed at a slightly younger age (median 56.3 vs 57.1 years; p < 0.001) and were more often HR-positive. Across HR- and stage-defined strata, pathological stage and HR status remained the principal determinants of prognosis. Compared with HER2-zero, HER2-low showed modestly higher hazards, with small but consistent separations in OS (91.8%, 93%, 83.3%, and 86.2% for HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-negative/HER2-low, and HR-negative/HER2-zero breast cancers; p < 0.0001) and RFS (95.6%, 97.1%, 89.6%, and 91.1% for HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-negative/HER2-low, and HR-negative/HER2-zero breast cancers; p < 0.0001) within strata, with the exception of stage 0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Taiwanese early-stage breast cancer, HER2-low is common and associated with greater HR positivity and modestly inferior OS/RFS relative to HER2-zero after HR and stage stratification. Further studies are warranted to understand the biological and therapeutic relevance of this newly established taxonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"354-363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13193289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor II (HER2)-low breast cancer has emerged as a clinically relevant subset of HER2-negative disease, but its prognostic significance in early-stage, real-world populations remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinicopathological features and outcomes of HER2-low vs HER2-zero early breast cancers using a nationwide registry and to clarify the impact of hormone receptor (HR) status.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry (2011-2020). Eligible cases were stages 0 to III HER2-negative breast cancers managed with upfront surgery. We compared clinical characteristics , overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). All analyses were stratified by HR (positive vs negative) and by pathological stage.
Results: We analyzed 38 773 patients; 65.4% were HER2-low and 34.6% were HER2-zero. HER2-low tumors were diagnosed at a slightly younger age (median 56.3 vs 57.1 years; p < 0.001) and were more often HR-positive. Across HR- and stage-defined strata, pathological stage and HR status remained the principal determinants of prognosis. Compared with HER2-zero, HER2-low showed modestly higher hazards, with small but consistent separations in OS (91.8%, 93%, 83.3%, and 86.2% for HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-negative/HER2-low, and HR-negative/HER2-zero breast cancers; p < 0.0001) and RFS (95.6%, 97.1%, 89.6%, and 91.1% for HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-negative/HER2-low, and HR-negative/HER2-zero breast cancers; p < 0.0001) within strata, with the exception of stage 0.
Conclusion: In Taiwanese early-stage breast cancer, HER2-low is common and associated with greater HR positivity and modestly inferior OS/RFS relative to HER2-zero after HR and stage stratification. Further studies are warranted to understand the biological and therapeutic relevance of this newly established taxonomy.