Invest-to-treat drug-coated balloon strategy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous intervention for high-risk stent failure patients.

Nino Cocco, Agostino Spanò, Claudiu Ungureanu, Giuseppe Colletti, Gregor Leibundgut, Daniel Weilenmann, Giulio Cocco, Simone Calcagno, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Gian P Ussia, Bernardo Cortese, Kambis Mashayekhi
{"title":"Invest-to-treat drug-coated balloon strategy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous intervention for high-risk stent failure patients.","authors":"Nino Cocco, Agostino Spanò, Claudiu Ungureanu, Giuseppe Colletti, Gregor Leibundgut, Daniel Weilenmann, Giulio Cocco, Simone Calcagno, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Gian P Ussia, Bernardo Cortese, Kambis Mashayekhi","doi":"10.5603/cj.109595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term patency in complex chronic total occlusion percutaneous intervention (CTO-PCI) is often hindered by a high-risk of stent-failure (HR-SF), impacting prognosis. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may offer an alternative after successful crossing. We evaluated an invest-to-treat DCB strategy, determined by plaque modification results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CTO wire-crossing and suboptimal lesion profile for stenting were enrolled at Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital of Rome (April-July 2024). After plaque preparation, results were classified as good, suboptimal, or poor based on residual stenosis and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow. Poor results received conventional stenting [drug-eluting stent (DES)]. Good results underwent a nine-month follow-up; suboptimal results underwent a three-month angiography. A \"redo-DCB\" approach was used for persistent suboptimal results within the invest-to-treat strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 32 CTO-PCIs performed, 29 completed the nine-month follow-up. 11 patients (38%) had poor outflow and required DES (DES-group). The other 18 patients (62%) were managed with DCB alone: six patients (21%) achieved good immediate results (DCB-group), and 12 (41%) were treated as \"DCB-investment\" due to suboptimal plaque modification (DCB-investment group). At the three-month follow-up, four patients (14%) showed improved angiographic results, while six (21%) had suboptimal outcomes and received redo-DCB after plaque modification; two (7%) of these required DES. At nine-months, 14 patients (48%) were successfully treated with a DCB-only approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective study demonstrates that a DCB strategy for CTO patients with HR-SF is feasible and safe. A DCB-only approach resulted in favorable early outcomes for most patients. In the case of suboptimal initial results, the redo-DCB strategy emerged as a promising alternative to extensive stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"33 ","pages":"e00226037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13189593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.109595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term patency in complex chronic total occlusion percutaneous intervention (CTO-PCI) is often hindered by a high-risk of stent-failure (HR-SF), impacting prognosis. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may offer an alternative after successful crossing. We evaluated an invest-to-treat DCB strategy, determined by plaque modification results.

Methods: Patients with CTO wire-crossing and suboptimal lesion profile for stenting were enrolled at Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital of Rome (April-July 2024). After plaque preparation, results were classified as good, suboptimal, or poor based on residual stenosis and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow. Poor results received conventional stenting [drug-eluting stent (DES)]. Good results underwent a nine-month follow-up; suboptimal results underwent a three-month angiography. A "redo-DCB" approach was used for persistent suboptimal results within the invest-to-treat strategy.

Results: Of 32 CTO-PCIs performed, 29 completed the nine-month follow-up. 11 patients (38%) had poor outflow and required DES (DES-group). The other 18 patients (62%) were managed with DCB alone: six patients (21%) achieved good immediate results (DCB-group), and 12 (41%) were treated as "DCB-investment" due to suboptimal plaque modification (DCB-investment group). At the three-month follow-up, four patients (14%) showed improved angiographic results, while six (21%) had suboptimal outcomes and received redo-DCB after plaque modification; two (7%) of these required DES. At nine-months, 14 patients (48%) were successfully treated with a DCB-only approach.

Conclusions: This prospective study demonstrates that a DCB strategy for CTO patients with HR-SF is feasible and safe. A DCB-only approach resulted in favorable early outcomes for most patients. In the case of suboptimal initial results, the redo-DCB strategy emerged as a promising alternative to extensive stenting.

高风险支架失效患者慢性全闭塞经皮介入治疗中的药物包被球囊策略。
背景:复杂慢性全闭塞经皮介入治疗(CTO-PCI)的长期通畅常因支架衰竭(HR-SF)的高风险而受阻,影响预后。药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术可以在成功穿越后提供另一种选择。我们评估了由斑块修饰结果决定的投资-治疗DCB策略。方法:2024年4月- 7月在罗马大学生物医学大学医院(Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital)招募CTO导线交叉、病变轮廓不理想的支架置入术患者。斑块制备后,根据残余狭窄和心肌梗死(TIMI)血流溶栓情况,将结果分为良好、次优或差。常规支架置入[药物洗脱支架(DES)]效果较差。随访9个月,结果良好;三个月的血管造影结果不理想。在“投资-治疗”策略中,使用“重做- dcb”方法来处理持续的次优结果。结果:32例cto - pci中,29例完成了9个月的随访。11例患者(38%)流出不良,需要DES治疗(DES组)。其他18例患者(62%)单独使用DCB治疗:6例患者(21%)获得了良好的即时效果(DCB组),12例患者(41%)由于次优斑块修饰而接受“DCB-投资”治疗(DCB-投资组)。在三个月的随访中,4名患者(14%)的血管造影结果有所改善,而6名患者(21%)的结果不理想,并在斑块修饰后接受了redo-DCB;其中2例(7%)需要DES。在9个月时,14例(48%)患者成功接受DCB-only方法治疗。结论:本前瞻性研究表明,DCB治疗合并HR-SF的CTO患者是可行且安全的。对大多数患者而言,仅采用dcb方法可获得良好的早期预后。在初始结果不理想的情况下,redo-DCB策略成为广泛支架置入的一种有希望的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书